Blog

My list of BLOG posts and other relevant website links:

1) A general book description.

2) My Chapter by chapter description.

3) My list of book PDF excerpts, which includes two complete chapters and the front and back cover design for my Taiwan edition.

4) My 67 second book trailer OR on YouTube.

5) ABOUT ME.

6) My Facebook posts from July 02nd 2020 until July 02 2022. NOTE: I was permanently booted off Facebook in early September 2022. I suspect for posting this DOCUMENT.

7) Why I belatedly wrote Chapter 29.

8) My message to Queensland Health on pseudo-vaccine coercion.

9) Brisbane Freedom Rally Saturday 20th November 2021; my impressions.

10) Why has Jackie Lambie done a 180 on pseudo-vaccines?

11) Brilliant and lucid message from a highly qualified but most importantly, honest medical professional.

12) My major objection to our Aussie cricketers paying homage to BLM – a Marxist terrorist entity — as emailed to Greg Rowell, Queensland delegate to Cricket Australia.

13) Eight false assumptions of pseudo-vaccines and time for Christians and the Church to stand up like Dietrich

14) LETTER TO Annastacia Palaszczuk PREMIER OF THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA MONDAY 3rd JANUARY 2022

15) My Email to Michael Gunner (Yes “GUNNER”) — Northern Territory Chief Minister of “Truth”

16) Summary of COVID A Second Opinion Conference Washington DC Monday 24th January 2022

17) My Polish perspective of Episode 2 of Faith and Reason February 24th 2022: Russia’s invasion is an opportunity to recall the message of Our Lady of Fatima.

18) The Russian invasion of Ukraine – The double-edged Globalist engineered conundrum of deceit, deception, confusion and subversion.

19) Andrei Illarionov article on the Biden-Putin duplicity in Ukraine taken down.

20) My letter to the Australian Greens New South Wales Member of Legislative Council (MLC) Cate Faehrmann

21) Message to American DEMRATS, RINOS, their supporters and GLOBALIST Institutionalised Fake News GIFN.

22) My letter to Mark Coleridge. Catholic Archbishop of Brisbane on Saturday 05th November 2022

23) Follow-up letter to Mark Coleridge: Catholic Archbishop of Brisbane on Sunday 13th November 2022

24) STEW PETERS NETWORK: DIED SUDDENLY — THE HEINOUS GLOBALIST POPULATION CONTROL AGENDA BEHIND THE COVID-19 JABS

25) McGill university’s undisclosed conflict of interest with Pfizer.

26) To: The Sycophants of Australian Globalist Institutionalised Fake News – GIFN in the wake of their hypocritical and opportunistic politicisation of the terrible Wieambilla police shootings 260 kilometres (160 miles) west-north-west of Brisbane Queensland Australia.

27) To: Rosie of SBS Australia Complaints Department to elaborate upon my previous BLOG post on the Wieambilla shootings

28) Message to Reverend Deacon Andrew O’Brien of Brisbane Catholic Archdiocese in wake of Wieambilla

29) MY SUBMISSION TO AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT TO PASS THE HUMAN RIGHTS CHILDREN BORN ALIVE PROTECTION ACT 2022. This relates to the incredibly much higher rate generally thought of for babies surviving abortion only to be discarded like medical waste! Dare I say, as discussed in my submission, much in the vein of the infamous T-4 Euthanasia programme implemented in Hitler’s Third Reich. Moreover, how this mindset defines the transhumanist World Economic Forum of Klaus Schwab and Yuval Noah Harari.

30) TO THOSE INEXORABLY ECSTATIC OVER ALVIN BRAGG’S “INDICTMENT” OF DONALD TRUMP. PERHAPS IT WILL BE YOUR TURN ONE DAY!

31) THE RADICAL SHIFT TODAY IN THE WEST OF THE POLITICAL CENTRIST FRAME OF REFERENCE.

32) My Easter 2023 message to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

33) You are an expert? So what is your agenda?

34) Summary of Submission against Australian and Orwellian Communications Legislation Amendment (Combating Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2023.

35) Essay on THE CATASTROPHIC CLIMATE CHANGE SCAM.

36) Story as told by his son of Polish war hero appallingly treated and dying in Hospital in Melbourne Australia during COVID dystopia.

37) Article submitted to the Catholic Crisis Magazine on Saturday 16th September 2023 titled “Globalist subversion of our faith leads me to the Latin Mass.”

38) My new mobile (cell) phone ringtone I created with the open-source AUDACITY application, before I uploaded it to my mobile phone. It mainly takes a swipe at the Catastrophic Climate Change Scam, although, one could easily allude it to the fraudulent November 2020 U.S. Presidential “election”, the November 2022 Midterms — especially in Arizona, and of course, the COVID JABS, or any other conceivable SCAM LEFTIST agenda.

39) My article written on Saturday 14th October 2023 — the day of Australia’s referendum on the “Indigenous” VOICE to Paraliament and its true agenda.

40) My essay on the aftermath of the barbaric Hamas attack on Israel on Saturday October 7th 2023. It is titled

I AM A ZIONIST; BUT GEORGE SOROS AND THE UN ARE NOT.

HAMAS ATTACK ON ISRAEL ON OCTOBER 7^th 2023 AND THE SUBSEQUENT GLOBALIST ENGINEERED PROPAGANDA WAR TO OBLITERATE ISRAEL’S RIGHT TO EXIST.

41) To: All Corrupt Australian GIFN — Globalist Institutionalised Fake News.

Their inexorable ecstasy over the dubious and politically motivated “conviction” of Donald Trump by the corrupt and George Soros funded Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

42) Toning it down in the wake of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. REALLY???

43) My Message to Two-Tiered-Stasi Keir Starmer

44) My first “DISINFORMATION” report to the Australian Marxist Labor Party’s DISINFORMATION Reporting Portal.

45) My message to Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers in documenting my objection in his government’s latest attempt to pass the Orwellian Communications Legislation Amendment (Combating Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill.

46) My Letter to the Deacon of Brisbane Archdiocese explaining why I spoke out at the Sunnybank Our Lady Of Lourdes Catholic Church Mass on Sunday 22nd September 2024.

47) Pravda on the Hudson — New York Times reporting on the CCP and how it relates to their projection of the overall picture of world events.

48) My objections to the October 2024 Open Letter: “Descendants: Do not distort and misuse Dietrich Bonhoeffer!”

49) The Biblically bastardized Cultural neo-Marxist WOKE sermon on Tuesday 21 January 2025 to undermine the legitimately elected Presidency of Donald J. Trump and promote the Globalist agenda of unelected bureaucrats of the World Economic Forum and its strategic partner the United Nations.

50) My follow up message to the Bonhoeffer 86.

51) My Letter to South Western Sydney Local Health District Office in regard to Feb 2025 Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital rabid anti-Semitic rant of two of its medical staff based on their perception of false history.

52) Latest Zelensky – Trump spat compelled me to write to my contact in Israel in regard to my insights into Putin and past potentially explosive Soviet machinations relating in part to Israel and the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis and more.

53) My Letter to Jim Chalmers questioning if his Marxist Australian Federal Labor Government’s commitment to the Catastrophic Climate Change Scam embodies Population Control.

54) My Letter to Australian Greens Senator and 2016 Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum Sarah Hanson-Young, questioning if her ideological commitment to the Catastrophic Climate Change Scam embodies Population Control.

55) My letter to the Bonhoeffer 86 in regard to Dennis Meadows’ plan of mass population culling in the name of the Catastrophic Climate Change Scam.

56) Exposing the deceptive Arabic to English translation in Section e4.3 of the Sharia Law Manual of The Reliance of the Traveller in regard to female circumcision. Which in turn, alludes as an example to the key overall Islamic concept of Taqiyyah.

“In their own Arabic and English words.”

PDF COPY

Back on the 12^th February 2025, I listened to the 100 minute YouTube video titled The Truth about Shariah Law – Q&A on the Channel of Lloyd De Jongh in an extended discussion with the Egyptian-American Baptist pastor Usama Dakdok, born and raised a Christian in Egypt, but migrating to America in 1992. Usama also studied for a university degree in Egypt which included the study of Sharia, Islamic law.

Lloyd, a South African, now based in Warsaw Poland, describes himself as a National Security and Technology professional, with 11 years Middle East experience, and a History buff and pro-Israel Christian. His X account is at @lloyddejongh.

Focusing on History, Religion, Ideology and Philosophy, but in particular Islam, he uses sophisticated technology to perform detailed research and analysis. His livestreams combat confusion, offer facts and historical truths, makes sense of the world, promoting Judeo-Christian morals and cultural values. He defends the West and recognises Christianity as a pillar of Western civilisation, which compels us to uphold what’s right in a society chronically adrift.

From about 1 hour and 21 minutes, the discussion turned to the topic of circumcision for men and women in Islam. Before too long, Lloyd brought up on his screen Section e4.3 of the Sharia Law Manual of The Reliance of the Traveller, which in the English translation states:

“Circumcision is obligatory (O: for both men and women. For men it consists of removing the prepuce from the penis, and for women, removing the prepuce (Ar. bazr) of the clitoris (n: not the clitoris itself, as some mistakenly assert). (A: Hanbalis hold that circumcision of women is not obligatory but sunna, while Hanafis consider it a mere courtesy to the husband.)”

However, Usama then asked Lloyd to move to the right of the document with the original Arabic, to which, not all that surprising it seemed to Usama, he discovered that the English translation was NOT a true translation of the original Arabic!

In short, Usama stated that in the original Arabic, the complete removal of the woman’s clitoris was MANDATORY!

To which Usama added; the reason for this barbaric practice was to remove the woman’s ability to experience pleasure during sex. To which one can only conclude, implies a chronic insecurity for male adherents and proponents of Sharia Law.

Weeks later, on the website of Answering Islam, I discovered the following statement in regard to Section e4.3 of the Sharia Law Manual of The Reliance of the Traveller:

QUOTE:

“The following quotation is taken from Reliance of the Traveller, Revised edition, amana publications, Beltsville, 1997. The title page informs us that this book is

The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law ‘Umdat al-Salik
by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 769/1368) in Arabic with
Facing English Text, Commentary, and Appendices
Edited and Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller

In this book, in the section titled “THE BODY”, we find on page 59 the following entry [As already quoted above.]:

e4.3 Circumcision is obligatory (O: for both men and women. For men it consists of removing the prepuce from the penis, and for women, removing the prepuce (Ar. Bazr) of the clitoris (n: not the clitoris itself, as some mistakenly assert). (A: Hanbalis hold that circumcision of women is not obligatory but sunna, while Hanafis consider it a mere courtesy to the husband.)”

[With the original Arabic as follows:]

The above used abbreviations mean:

A: ... comment by Sheikh ‘Abd al-Wakil Durubi
Ar.    Arabic
n: ... remark by the translator
O: ... excerpt from the commentary of Sheikh ‘Umar Barakat

However what the Arabic actually says is:

Circumcision is obligatory (for every male and female) by cutting off the piece of skin on the glans of the penis of the male, but circumcision of the female is by cutting out the clitoris (this is called HufaaD). {bold emphasis ours}

[See also pages 63 to 64 of The third choice : Islam, dhimmitude and freedom by Mark Durie, published in 2010, ISBN: 9780980722307, 0980722306, 9781926800004, 1926800001, Durie uses “this is called khifad ‘female circumcision’” at the end rather than “this is called HufaaD”. Durie also gives five detailed footnotes at the bottom of page 64, and likewise at the foot of page 63.]

The Arabic word bazr does not mean “prepuce of the clitoris”, it means the clitoris itself (cf. the entry in the Arabic-English Dictionary). [This LINK is now dead. However, see HERE.] The deceptive translation by Nuh Hah Mim Keller, made for Western consumption, obscures the Shafi’i law, given by ‘Umdat al-Salik, that circumcision of girls by excision of the clitoris is mandatory. This particular form of female circumcision is widely practiced in Egypt, where the Shafi’i school of Sunni law is followed.

UNQUOTE

To which, just below the above extended quote there is the following most poignant link:

Further Reading: Islam and Lying

… where the key Islamic concept of Taqiyyah, embodying the justification of lying in furtherance of Islam, is discussed in detail. Which moreover confirms what Usama Dakdok implied in his online discussion with Lloyd; that lying is inherently essential in propagating and infiltrating Islam into a naive non-Muslim world.

To which, as stated from section o9.1 of the Reliance of the Traveller, most poignantly segues in regard to hijra [emigration] only being justified to the end of performing jihad:

“If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

The FIRST is when they [non-Muslims] are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, [OK – Certainly NOT Fair Enough! As is the case today with “Great” Britain under WOKE Cultural neo-Marxist useful idiot two-tiered-Stasi-Starmer, as he sanctions its descent into the proverbial Sharia Hell-Hole Abyss!] and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year. [Jihad here being in the sense of covert 5^th generational warfare, or as the famous Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci [1891-1937] put it: “The long march through the institutions”.]

The SECOND STATE [OK – Fair Enough] is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).”

And even more explicitly from Sahih al-Bukhari 2825 : Book 56, Hadith 41:

“On the day of the Conquest (of Mecca) the Prophet () said, ‘There is no emigration after the Conquest but Jihad and intentions. When you are called (by the Muslim ruler) for fighting, go forth immediately.’” [See also this X post by Lloyd.]

Hence, does this excerpt from section o9.1 of the Reliance of The Traveller Sharia Manual and Sahih al-Bukhari 2825 : Book 56, Hadith 41 then not both imply, that if a Muslim emigrates from say the Middle East to a Western country, he or she is thus compelled to participate in Jihad in the Western country? And indeed, has this been the very essence of Great Britain’s descent into the abyss of the Sharia Hell-Hole? Moreover, from section o9.16 dealing with TRUCES:

“So do not be fainthearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost” (Koran 47:35). [And indeed today in Stasi-Starmer’s Two-Tiered-Sharia-Hell-Hole Britain, the jihadists could hardly be more emboldened to gleefully comply with Koran 47:35.]

As such, does this not then imply, that when Islam in a Western country is far too small in number, with most strategic and deceitful prudence and wisdom, they proclaim Islam as “the religion of peace?” Whilst on the other hand, as is the case in the undeniably Sharia Hell-Hole that defines Two-Tiered-Stasi-Starmer’s “Great” Britain today, they, in their state of excess-populous-critical-mass, aggressively push for the implementation and invocation of Sharia Law?

Hence, in conclusion:

“God [not Allah and not Muhammad] is not a man that he should lie. [Numbers 23:19] It is impossible for God to lie. Jesus said; “I am the way, the truth, and the life.” Truth, [as is allowed by Islamic Taqiyyah] is NOT optional in the Christian faith. It’s the foundation. If a belief system requires deception to protect itself or spread, what does that say about its origin? God does not need lies [nor the synonymous coercion of death embodied in Sharia o8.1 – o8.2] to defend truth, but falsehood [as embodied in Taqiyyah], always does.”

From: Vince Barwinski <vince.barwinski@gmail.com>

To: tobiaskorenke@aol.com,

office.bonhoeffer@bi.mpg.de,

ruggero@schleicher-tappeser.eu

Date: 14 Mar 2025, 14:45

PDF COPY

My objections to the October 2024 Open Letter: “Descendants: Do not distort and misuse Dietrich Bonhoeffer!” SIGNED by 86 of exactly 100 adult surviving descendants of Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Hence my term: “Bonhoeffer 86“.

Subject: Does your commitment to the perceived crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change embody an agenda of population control? If so, whom of humanity will be considered expendable?

Dear Gentleman

[Three minute READ.]

I wish to share with a disturbing revelation in regard to the agenda of your Catastrophic Climate Change Scam (CCCS).

In essence, it is embodied in the fourth segment of a 2017 overall forty-two minute video interview in Holland of 1968 founding Club of Rome member Dennis Meadows [See pages 9 and 11], that can be summed up as:

“In his own words”

This disturbing information about the economic wrecking ball that is the Catastrophic Climate Change Scam I have long suspected, but it was finally and unequivocally revealed to me via an American podcast, which then prompted me to research it further in depth.

And upon doing this research, I was prompted to write to my local Australian Federal Government member for Rankin; Treasurer Jim Chalmers, and the South Australian Federal Greens Senator and 2016 Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum; Sarah Hanson-Young. In my letters to them, which are both about a 15 minute read, I posed the following two key questions:

“Given your commitment to the perceived crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change, does such a commitment ultimately embody an agenda of population control? If so, whom of humanity will be considered expendable?”

The PDF copies of these two similar letters I have uploaded to my website at:

https://vincebarwinski.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/message_to_jim_chalmers_on_CCCS_and_population_control_12th_march_2025.pdf

AND

https://vincebarwinski.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/message_to_senator_sarah_hanson-young_on_CCCS_and_population_control_13th_march_2025.pdf

I have also posted this on X at:

https://x.com/VincentBarwinsk/status/1899987074318561649

On pages 3 to 4 of both PDFs, I get to the nitty gritty with a screenshot of the aforementioned 1968 founding member of the Club of Rome, namely Dennis Meadows [See pages 9 and 11], in a 2017 interview in Holland, with a Dutch Climate Alarmist YouTube Channel “WeLoveEarth”, calling for a culling of the world population down to ONE or TWO Billion – but of course, in a:

“Civil or peaceful manner!”

… before I conclude my letters with a poignant mention of Heinrich Himmler from Chapter 23; “Buchenwald” of my book – The Pastor and the Matriarch of the German Underground and Their Times – A Polish Perspective.

All to which, I ask you:

“Would your Great Uncle Dietrich approve of Dennis Meadows’ plan of mass global population culling? Moreover, based entirely upon your fake climate crisis?”

In closing, I suggest you take the time to read my three-minute-read-email dated 13^th March 2025 to Professor Ian Plimer, author of the excellent and compelling read Green Murder that I finished reading back in October 2024. I have briefly spoken to him on two occasions. Including in regard to Vladimir Putin, of whom, he mentioned in his book Green Murder because of Putin’s CYNICAL funding of nefarious Green environmental groups in the West to undermine it. [See the Summary and search for TEXT: “environmental”]. Certainly not because he believes in your Catastrophic Climate Change Scam! To which, how do you feel about this as you wave your Ukrainian flags in quintessential leftist hypocrisy?

And indeed, as I requested of Professor Ian Plimer, I would love to hear your thoughts!

For now Gentleman …. All the best and God Bless.

Vince Barwinski

Matthew Chapter 7 verse 3:

“And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?”

To: Senator Sarah Hanson-Young

Australian Greens

2016 Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum

https://www.sarahhansonyoung.com/

https://greens.org.au/sa/news/media-release/sarah-hanson-young-named-world-economic-forum-young-global-leader-2016

https://www.facebook.com/Senator.Sarah.Hanson.Young/about

https://x.com/sarahinthesen8/media

senator.hanson-young@aph.gov.au

(08) 8227 0426

(08) 8227 0425

Thursday 13^th March 2025

PDF COPY

Subject: Does your commitment to the perceived crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change embody an agenda of population control? If so, whom of humanity will be considered expendable?

Dear Senator Hanson-Young

[15 minute read]

Back on the 15^th September 2024, I wrote to Treasurer Jim Chalmers in regard to his government’s renewed attempt to pass the Orwellian Communications Legislation Amendment (Combating Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2023. And in that letter, I referred to my submission against that Bill.

Just to reiterate, this August 2023 submission of mine, with KEY SEARCH TERMS ON page 5, is available on my website at:

https://vincebarwinski.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/COMPLETE_submission_against_combatting_acma_misinformation_and_disinformation_bill_2023.pdf

In it, I ask the key questions of how governments globally, including our own successive federal governments, have since the outbreak of the COVID pLandemic, propagated an interminable litany of lies in the true spirit of the Orwellian Ministry of “Truth”, as follows;

1) “Who in the Universe are you to proclaim yourselves the gaslighting ultimate arbiters of truth?”

AND:

2) “To whom are you and our so-called elected and representative federal government and politicians such as yourself as a Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum since 2016, truly beholden? The people of Australia or unelected bureaucratic sociopaths in Geneva Switzerland [Headquarters of the World Economic Forum and WHO] and New York [Headquarters of the UN]?”

AND to which I add now:

3) “Do you wish for a global dystopian Orwellian future for your children?”

In my September 2024 letter to Jim Chalmers, I raised the most poignant story of Marian Vagner, a World War II Polish Boy Scout Hero, who risked his life in supplying food to the Częstohowa (Chenstohova) Jewish Ghetto and on multiple occasions, faced the barrel of German Guns.

Then, in that letter, I documented my scanning of the Freedom of Information Document detailing Marian’s medical history at Melbourne’s Alfred Hospital. From which I noticed that days before his ignominious and humiliating death, he was given the dangerous drug Molnupiravir – as attested to by multiple world-renowned and brave dissident doctors at a hearing chaired by US Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin in Washington DC on Monday January 24^th 2022.

To which at this point, it is most propitious for me to segue into the key question(s) pertaining to this letter as stated in the subject line, that I have just submitted earlier today in my letter to your ideological ally Jim Chalmers. Namely, given your and the Federal Labor government’s commitment to the perceived crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change as the quintessential defining reason for the existence of the Australian Greens, does such a commitment ultimately embody an agenda of population control? If so, whom of humanity will be considered expendable? As a Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum since 2016, I imagine you would have some revealing and unique insights in regard to such key questions, pertaining intimately to the very existence of humanity.

To which you may ask:

“How was I prompted to ask you such ‘outrageous’ questions?”

In short; my somewhat cryptic answer is as follows:

“In his own words.”

Of which I shall now expand upon in depth.

To begin with, the individual I am referring to is Dennis Lynn Meadows. He was born in 1942 and is emeritus professor of systems policy and social science research at the University of New Hampshire, where he was also director of the Institute for Policy and Social Science Research. In 2009 he received the Japan Prize for his contributions to world peace and sustainable development. He has authored ten books and numerous educational games, which have been translated into more than 15 languages for use around the world. He earned his Ph.D. in Management from M.I.T. [Massachusetts Institute of Technology], where he previously served on the faculty, and has received four honorary doctorates for his contributions to environmental education.

And from the 1977 book he edited; Alternatives to growth-I : a search for sustainable futures,ⁱ his background is documented as follows:

“Dennis L. Meadows, Associate Professor of Engineering at Dartmouth [in 1977], holds a B.A. degree from Carleton College and a doctorate from M.I.T. He was director of the Club of Rome Project on the Predicament of Mankind at M.I.T. from 1970 to 1972. He has been a Research Fellow at the East-West Population Institute in Honolulu and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria. His research and teaching focus on population-resource interactions within a finite world. He currently directs a graduate program at Dartmouth on public systems analysis and design, and consults for a number of government agencies on system analysis techniques and resource policy. His books include The Limits to Growth, Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World, and Dynamics of Commodity Production Cycles.”

And on an Internet archived or WayBack Machine archived biography from your dear friends of the World Economic Forum: (Why was it removed?)

“Dennis Meadows

Professor Emeritus and Director, Institute for Policy and Social Science, University of New Hampshire

Member of the faculty: 1969-72, MIT; 1972-88, Dartmouth College; 1988-2004, University of New Hampshire; in each institution, directed centres for policy on economic and environmental issues. Designer of management training games used by thousands of teachers and consultants in 15 countries. Has conducted workshops and spoken about sustainable development in over 40 nations. Member of the Board of Directors, financial, software and alternative energy firms, Europe and the US. Author of 10 books on the environment, systems and energy, translated into 35 languages. Recipient of awards: four honorary doctorates; Fulbright Fellowship to the USSR (1989); Order of Honour from the President of Hungary (2006); Peace Prize, German Committee, UNESCO (2007); Japan Prize (2009).”

Undoubtedly, Dennis Lynn Meadows is one individual with the most impeccable and highly qualified credentials to push the Globalist agenda of the United Nations, its strategic partner the World Economic Forum, his beloved Club of Rome and indeed yourselves among the Australian Greens. Moreover, Chapter 5 of Trevor Loudon’s book Comrade Prime Minister: Anthony Albanese’s 40-Year Alliance with Australian Communism pointedly highlights as such for your Greens Party and the Australian Labor Party.

Now, around late August to early September 2017, Dennis Meadows was invited by the Club of Rome Dutch Association, to come to the Netherlands and be interviewed by your ideological clones of the Dutch YouTube Climate Catastrophist Channel; WeLoveEarth at a location offered by the Nyenrode Business University.

During this 43 minute interview, given in four 9 to 12 minute segments,ⁱⁱ it was in the fourth segment from 1 minute and 14 seconds to 5 minutes, that Dennis Meadows said “the quiet part out loud!” Namely, that in the interest of fighting his and your global ilk’s perceived and eminent climate catastrophe, we must reduce our global population down to ONE … or at the very least … TWO billion people!!

YES … I repeat … in his eyes … we must reduce our global population down to ONE … or at the very least … TWO billion people!!

And in the process, he hopes it can be implemented civilly … or in a peaceful manner!

Hmmmm … makes me think of the MAID – Medical Assistance In Dying program in Justin Trudeau’s Canada,ⁱⁱⁱ where the government decides who and who is NOT worthy of life. To which, do you think the over-educated and pretentious self-important Globalist toady sycophant of an academic “expert”, bereft of all education in practical life experience, that is Dennis Lynn Meadows, have deemed say Marian Vagner in July 2022, at age 91, in accordance with it seems Melbourne’s Alfred Hospital, UNWORTHY of life?

Or, should Dennis Lynn Meadows, now at 82 years old, just nine years younger than Marian Vagner at the time of his death in July 2022, be the first to practice what he preaches, in order to curtail his forthcoming fake crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change?

And in my estimation, someone such as Marian Vagner, the very epitome of COURAGE, TRUTH and FREEDOM, as exemplified in his risking of his life in supplying food to the Częstohowa (Chenstohova) Jewish Ghetto, and on multiple occasions, facing the barrel of German Guns as a twelve year old boy, is 100 times over, more worthy of life than some pretentiously over-educated Globalist sycophant epitomising the COWARDICE, LIES and TYRANNY that have facilitated the Globalist dystopia engulfing our world today.

I will close with two further points highlighting the bankruptcy of credibility that is the CCCS. Firstly from the introductory paragraph of the introduction of Dennis Meadow’s 1972 book The Limits to Growth, Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World.

“I do not wish to seem over dramatic, but I can only conclude from the Information that is available to me as Secretary-General, that the Members of the United Nations have perhaps ten years left in which to subordinate their ancient quarrels and launch a global partnership to curb the arms race, to improve the human environment, to defuse the population explosion, and to supply the required momentum to development efforts. If such a global partnership is not forged within the next decade, then I very much fear that the problems I have mentioned will have reached such staggering proportions that they will be beyond our capacity to control.”

U THANT, 1969

Secretary-General of the United Nations 1961-1971

Well, ten years after 1969 and seven years following the publishing of Dennis Meadow’s book The Limits to Growth, Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World in 1972, it was in 1979, that no such crisis as predicted by U Thant materialised. No less credibly bankrupt were the claims of population catastrophism as virulently espoused by the like minded screw or two loose death cultist Paul Ralph Ehrlich in his 1968 book The Population Bomb. Four or so decades later, with none of its apocalyptic predictions coming true, he and his wife Anne felt compelled to write the paper; The Population Bomb Revisited.

Secondly and finally, another rabid climate alarmist by the name of Al Gore, Democrat US presidential candidate in 2000, vice president in the Clinton administration from 1993-2001 and member of your beloved World Economic Forum’s board of trustees,^iv in his 2006 documentary An Inconvenient Truth^v made the climate alarmist friendly but erroneous assertion that rising CO₂ levels cause rising temperatures – in spite of the Vostok ice core and Milankovitch cycle data clearly indicating the exact opposite.^vi Nevertheless, and in spite of numerous other documented inaccuracies,^vii in 2007, Al Gore was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, along with the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, for “informing the world of the dangers posed by climate change”. As Patrick Moore stated: [I paraphrase. And in spite of your ilk trying to deny it, he was a founding member of Greenpeace as its archived or WayBack Machine copy confirms.]

“However, changes in orbit that alter the distance from the Sun along with changes of tilt could quite conceivably cause changes to the Earth’s temperature regime. And a change in temperature in the atmosphere also means a change in temperature of the world’s oceans causing them to absorb more CO₂ when they cool and to emit more CO₂ when they warm. Moreover, given that the oceans contain almost 50 times as much CO₂ as the atmosphere, just a one percent change in oceanic CO₂ results in a 50 percent change in atmospheric CO₂.”^viii

The film’s distributor, Paramount, in typical Climate Catastrophist alarmism, warned in its 2006 synopsis of the film:

“Humanity is sitting on a ticking time bomb. If the vast majority of the world’s scientists are right, we have just ten year’s to avert a major catastrophe that could send our entire planet into a tail-spin of epic destruction involving extreme weather, floods, droughts, epidemics and killer heat waves beyond anything we have ever experienced.”^ix

By November 2012, Paramount removed this apocalyptic but embarrassingly erroneous synopsis!^x No problem! The good old WayBack Machine furnishes a November 27^th, 2010 archived copy at https://web.archive.org/web/20101127132653/http://www.paramountpictures.co.uk/films/an_inconvenient_truth/index.asp!

Moreover, in 2007, a UK High Court judge ruled that Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth contained nine key scientific errors. While not banning its screening in British schools, judge Michael Burton ruled that it could only be shown with guidance notes to prevent political indoctrination.^xi In 2025 however, the indoctrination of school students as to the so-called indisputable consensus of Catastrophic Climate Change, is ubiquitous. To which my personalised mobile phone ringtone provides the requisite comic relief presentation of truth.

And yet, the climate catastrophist clown Dennis Meadows, claims that no less than population culling of billions is demanded in the name of his fake crisis!! A crisis which only exists in the minds of himself and his fellow ilk of pretentious self-important Globalist toadying sycophants of over-educated academic “experts”, bereft of all education in practical life experience.

To which, I wonder if you are comforted with Dennis Meadows’ assurance of “civil or peaceful” population culling? If so, I shall leave you to consider the following exchange from the final months of Adolf Hitler’s Reich in February to March 1945, as documented in Chapter 23 Buchenwald of my book The Pastor and the Matriarch of the German Underground and Their Times – A Polish Perspective:

“At their first opportunity to speak at length, [SS Doctor] Sigmund Rascher [he fell out of favour with Hitler’s regime] told Sigismund Payne Best [British operative captured early in WWII] that he had been on Heinrich Himmler’s [Head of the Gestapo and SS and born on October 7^th 1900] personal staff, and that it was he who had planned and supervised the construction of the gas chambers and was responsible for the use of prisoners as guinea pigs in medical research.^xii Rascher saw nothing wrong in this, and described it as mere expediency, as if it were nothing more sinister than performing a routine operation or experimenting on rats. In regard to the gas chambers, he described Himmler as a “very kind-hearted man,” who was most anxious that prisoners be exterminated in a manner that caused them “least anxiety and suffering!”^xiii

Hence Senator Hanson-Young, are you still disencumbered of any possible concerns by the assurances of Dennis Meadows of “civil” or “peaceful” population mitigation? And can Mr. “Screw or two loose” Meadows be as “humane” as Heinrich Himmler – born on October 7^th 1900?

Yours Sincerely

Vince Barwinski

To: Jim Chalmers

Australian Labor Party

Federal Labor Member for Rankin

Treasurer of Australia

jim.chalmers.mp@aph.gov.au

jim.chalmers@treasury.gov.au

jim.chalmers@queenslandlabor.org

https://jimchalmers.org/get-involved/contact-jim/

Wednesday 12^th March 2025

PDF COPY

Subject: Does your commitment to the perceived crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change embody an agenda of population control? If so, whom of humanity will be considered expendable?

Dear Mr Chalmers.

[15 minute read]

Back on the 15^th September 2024, I wrote to you in regard to your renewed attempt to pass the Orwellian Communications Legislation Amendment (Combating Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2023. And in that letter to you, I referred to my submission against that Bill.

Just to reiterate, this August 2023 submission of mine, with KEY SEARCH TERMS ON page 5, is available on my website at:

https://vincebarwinski.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/COMPLETE_submission_against_combatting_acma_misinformation_and_disinformation_bill_2023.pdf

In it, I ask the key questions of how governments globally, including yourselves, have since the outbreak of the COVID pLandemic, with the interminable litany of lies your ilk have propagated, in the true spirit of the Orwellian Ministry of “Truth”, as follows;

1) “Who in the Universe are you to proclaim yourselves the gaslighting ultimate arbiters of truth?”

AND:

2) “To whom are you and our so-called elected and representative federal government, truly beholden? The people of Australia or unelected bureaucratic sociopaths in Geneva Switzerland [Headquarters of the World Economic Forum and WHO] and New York [Headquarters of the UN]?”

AND to which I add now:

3) “Do you wish for a global dystopian Orwellian future for your children?”

In my September 2024 letter to you, I raised the most poignant story of Marian Vagner, a World War II Polish Boy Scout Hero, who risked his life in supplying food to the Częstohowa (Chenstohova) Jewish Ghetto and on multiple occasions, faced the barrel of German Guns.

Then, in that letter to you, I documented my scanning of the Freedom of Information Document detailing Marian’s medical history at Melbourne’s Alfred Hospital. From which I noticed that days before his ignominious and humiliating death, he was given the dangerous drug Molnupiravir – as attested to by multiple world-renowned and brave dissident doctors at a hearing chaired by US Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin in Washington DC on Monday January 24^th 2022.

To which at this point, it is most propitious for me to segue into the key question(s) pertaining to this letter as stated in the subject line. Namely, given your commitment to the perceived crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change, does such a commitment ultimately embody an agenda of population control? If so, whom of humanity will be considered expendable?

To which you may ask:

“How was I prompted to ask you such ‘outrageous’ questions?”

In short; my somewhat cryptic answer is as follows:

“In his own words.”

Of which I shall now expand upon in depth.

To begin with, the individual I am referring to is Dennis Lynn Meadows. He was born in 1942 and is emeritus professor of systems policy and social science research at the University of New Hampshire, where he was also director of the Institute for Policy and Social Science Research. In 2009 he received the Japan Prize for his contributions to world peace and sustainable development. He has authored ten books and numerous educational games, which have been translated into more than 15 languages for use around the world. He earned his Ph.D. in Management from M.I.T. [Massachusetts Institute of Technology], where he previously served on the faculty, and has received four honorary doctorates for his contributions to environmental education.

And from the 1977 book he edited; Alternatives to growth-I : a search for sustainable futures,ⁱ his background is documented as follows:

“Dennis L. Meadows, Associate Professor of Engineering at Dartmouth [in 1977], holds a B.A. degree from Carleton College and a doctorate from M.I.T. He was director of the Club of Rome Project on the Predicament of Mankind at M.I.T. from 1970 to 1972. He has been a Research Fellow at the East-West Population Institute in Honolulu and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria. His research and teaching focus on population-resource interactions within a finite world. He currently directs a graduate program at Dartmouth on public systems analysis and design, and consults for a number of government agencies on system analysis techniques and resource policy. His books include The Limits to Growth, Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World, and Dynamics of Commodity Production Cycles.”

And on an Internet archived or WayBack Machine World Economic Forum biography:

“Dennis Meadows

Professor Emeritus and Director, Institute for Policy and Social Science, University of New Hampshire

Member of the faculty: 1969-72, MIT; 1972-88, Dartmouth College; 1988-2004, University of New Hampshire; in each institution, directed centres for policy on economic and environmental issues. Designer of management training games used by thousands of teachers and consultants in 15 countries. Has conducted workshops and spoken about sustainable development in over 40 nations. Member of the Board of Directors, financial, software and alternative energy firms, Europe and the US. Author of 10 books on the environment, systems and energy, translated into 35 languages. Recipient of awards: four honorary doctorates; Fulbright Fellowship to the USSR (1989); Order of Honour from the President of Hungary (2006); Peace Prize, German Committee, UNESCO (2007); Japan Prize (2009).”

Undoubtedly, Dennis Lynn Meadows is one individual with the most impeccable and highly qualified credentials to push the Globalist agenda of the United Nations, its strategic partner the World Economic Forum and his beloved Club of Rome. And given your government’s unquestionable and unwavering commitment [Chapter 5] to the Catastrophic Climate Change Scam (CCCS), I’m sure you would concur.

Now, around late August to early September 2017, Dennis Meadows was invited by the Club of Rome Dutch Association, to come to the Netherlands and be interviewed by the Dutch YouTube Climate Catastrophist Channel; WeLoveEarth at a location offered by the Nyenrode Business University.

During this 43 minute interview, given in four 9 to 12 minute segments,ⁱⁱ it was in the fourth segment from 1 minute and 14 seconds to 5 minutes, that Dennis Meadows said “the quiet part out loud!” Namely, that in the interest of fighting his and his ilk’s perceived and eminent climate catastrophe, we must reduce our global population down to ONE … or at the very least … TWO billion people!!

YES … I repeat … in his eyes … we must reduce our global population down to ONE … or at the very least … TWO billion people!!

And in the process, he hopes it can be implemented civilly … or in a peaceful manner!

Hmmmm … makes me think of the MAID – Medical Assistance In Dying program in Justin Trudeau’s Canada,ⁱⁱⁱ where the government decides who and who is NOT worthy of life. To which, do you think the over-educated and pretentious self-important Globalist toady sycophant of an academic “expert”, bereft of all education in practical life experience, that is Dennis Lynn Meadows, have deemed say Marian Vagner in July 2022, at age 91, in accordance with it seems Melbourne’s Alfred Hospital, UNWORTHY of life?

Or, should Dennis Lynn Meadows, now at 82 years old, just nine years younger than Marian Vagner at the time of his death in July 2022, be the first to practice what he preaches, in order to curtail his forthcoming fake crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change?

And in my estimation, someone such as Marian Vagner, the very epitome of COURAGE, TRUTH and FREEDOM, as exemplified in his risking of his life in supplying food to the Częstohowa (Chenstohova) Jewish Ghetto, and on multiple occasions, facing the barrel of German Guns as a twelve year old boy, is 100 times over, more worthy of life than some pretentiously over-educated Globalist sycophant epitomising the COWARDICE, LIES and TYRANNY that have facilitated the Globalist dystopia engulfing our world today.

I will close with two further points highlighting the bankruptcy of credibility that is the CCCS. Firstly from the introductory paragraph of the introduction of Dennis Meadow’s 1972 book The Limits to Growth, Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World.

“I do not wish to seem over dramatic, but I can only conclude from the Information that is available to me as Secretary-General, that the Members of the United Nations have perhaps ten years left in which to subordinate their ancient quarrels and launch a global partnership to curb the arms race, to improve the human environment, to defuse the population explosion, and to supply the required momentum to development efforts. If such a global partnership is not forged within the next decade, then I very much fear that the problems I have mentioned will have reached such staggering proportions that they will be beyond our capacity to control.”

U THANT, 1969

Secretary-General of the United Nations 1961-1971

Well, ten years after 1969 and seven years following the publishing of Dennis Meadow’s book The Limits to Growth, Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World in 1972, it was in 1979, that no such crisis as predicted by U Thant materialised. No less credibly bankrupt were the claims of population catastrophism as virulently espoused by the like minded screw or two loose death cultist Paul Ralph Ehrlich in his 1968 book The Population Bomb. Four or so decades later, with none of its apocalyptic predictions coming true, he and his wife Anne felt compelled to write the paper; The Population Bomb Revisited.

Secondly and finally, another rabid climate alarmist by the name of Al Gore, Democrat US presidential candidate in 2000, vice president in the Clinton administration from 1993-2001 and member of the World Economic Forum’s board of trustees,^iv in his 2006 documentary An Inconvenient Truth^v made the climate alarmist friendly but erroneous assertion that rising CO₂ levels cause rising temperatures – in spite of the Vostok ice core and Milankovitch cycle data clearly indicating the exact opposite.^vi Nevertheless, and in spite of numerous other documented inaccuracies,^vii in 2007, Al Gore was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, along with the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, for “informing the world of the dangers posed by climate change”. As Patrick Moore stated: [I paraphrase]

“However, changes in orbit that alter the distance from the Sun along with changes of tilt could quite conceivably cause changes to the Earth’s temperature regime. And a change in temperature in the atmosphere also means a change in temperature of the world’s oceans causing them to absorb more CO₂ when they cool and to emit more CO₂ when they warm. Moreover, given that the oceans contain almost 50 times as much CO₂ as the atmosphere, just a one percent change in oceanic CO₂ results in a 50 percent change in atmospheric CO₂.”^viii

The film’s distributor, Paramount, in typical Climate Catastrophist alarmism, warned in its 2006 synopsis of the film:

“Humanity is sitting on a ticking time bomb. If the vast majority of the world’s scientists are right, we have just ten year’s to avert a major catastrophe that could send our entire planet into a tail-spin of epic destruction involving extreme weather, floods, droughts, epidemics and killer heat waves beyond anything we have ever experienced.”^ix

By November 2012, Paramount removed this apocalyptic but embarrassingly erroneous synopsis!^x No problem! The good old WayBack Machine furnishes a November 27^th, 2010 archived copy at https://web.archive.org/web/20101127132653/http://www.paramountpictures.co.uk/films/an_inconvenient_truth/index.asp!

Moreover, in 2007, a UK High Court judge ruled that Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth contained nine key scientific errors. While not banning its screening in British schools, judge Michael Burton ruled that it could only be shown with guidance notes to prevent political indoctrination.^xi In 2025 however, the indoctrination of school students as to the so-called indisputable consensus of Catastrophic Climate Change, is ubiquitous. To which my personalised mobile phone ringtone provides the requisite comic relief presentation of truth.

And yet, the climate catastrophist clown Dennis Meadows, claims that no less than population culling of billions is demanded in the name of his fake crisis. A crisis which only exists in the minds of himself and his fellow ilk of pretentious self-important Globalist toadying sycophants of over-educated academic “experts”, bereft of all education in practical life experience.

To which, I wonder if you are comforted with Dennis Meadows’ assurance of “civil or peaceful” population culling? If so, I shall leave you to consider the following exchange from the final months of Adolf Hitler’s Reich in February to March 1945, as documented in Chapter 23 Buchenwald of my book The Pastor and the Matriarch of the German Underground and Their Times – A Polish Perspective:

“At their first opportunity to speak at length, [SS Doctor] Sigmund Rascher [he fell out of favour with Hitler’s regime] told Sigismund Payne Best [British operative captured early in WWII] that he had been on Heinrich Himmler’s [Head of the Gestapo and SS and born on October 7^th 1900] personal staff, and that it was he who had planned and supervised the construction of the gas chambers and was responsible for the use of prisoners as guinea pigs in medical research.^xii Rascher saw nothing wrong in this, and described it as mere expediency, as if it were nothing more sinister than performing a routine operation or experimenting on rats. In regard to the gas chambers, he described Himmler as a “very kind-hearted man,” who was most anxious that prisoners be exterminated in a manner that caused them “least anxiety and suffering!”^xiii

Hence Mr. Chalmers, are you still disencumbered of any possible concerns by the assurances of Dennis Meadows of “civil” or “peaceful” population mitigation? And can Mr. “Screw or two loose” Meadows be as “humane” as Heinrich Himmler – born on October 7^th 1900?

Yours Sincerely

Vince Barwinski

To: Aharon Levarko

https://www.lighttothenationsministry.com/contact/

aharon1@live.com

Saturday 01st March 2025

Subject: Latest Zelensky – Trump spat compelled me to write to you my insights into Putin and past potentially explosive Soviet machinations relating in part to Israel and much more. [13 minute read.]

PDF COPY

Dear Aharon

How are you? I have just watched the latest public spat between Trump/Vance and Zelensky on Brannon’s Worldview tube, and listened to the commentary of Brannon and his panel with Leo Hohmann and David Pyne.

Zelensky could have been better dressed, and I think he does not realise how weak his hand right now is, or is desperate, in accordance with the globalist mindset of his increasingly authoritarian Western European overlords, to continue this forever war. As such, I think the minerals deal Trump has offered him, with its indirect security guarantee of major US economic interests becoming embedded in Ukraine, deterring one would think a second Putin invasion of Ukraine, is really his only option. Jonathan Tobin of JNS, likewise certainly thinks that this World War One like stalemate meat grinder should end.

Anyway, as much as I admire Brannon and his Worldview tube, I think he and his panelists are a bit biased against Ukraine. Certainly, many MAGA supporters are hard pressed in supporting Ukraine given for one thing, the Western North Carolina devastation of late September 2024, when the fraudulently elected Biden regime claimed there were no funds for them, but still virtually unlimited funds to continue the Ukraine war. Which I must add, not for the good of Ukraine, but rather for the benefit of the global military industrial complex, and corrupt DEMRAT and RINO neocon politicians of the Washington DC sewer. For one thing, when the incognisant RINO neocon Senator Mitch McConnell let it slip, that no matter how much money Congress sends to Ukraine, it will end up back in America – to keep funding the Military Industrial Complex, that one could say, to perpetuate the replacement forever war, that is the Russia-Ukraine War substituting the Afghanistan war ending with the botched, disastrous and incompetent 2021 Biden-Harris DC Sewer junta withdrawal.

When our corrupt global mainstream media constantly claim that Zelensky is the indisputable hero, and Putin conversely is the likewise unquestionable villain, it’s only natural that freedom people and patriots in general for the most part, are going to think the exact opposite is true. For mine, Putin and Zelensky are opposite sides of the Globalist coin, committed to a never ending war in Ukraine, which for one thing, has served the purpose of another globalist driven dialectic to further divide America. And for myself, it had led to the end of my friendship with one gentleman, who honestly believed that Putin was our saviour from the globalists of the UN and WEF.

You say Aharon, that people very often, do not like hearing the truth – especially when it does not comport with their world view. At the Kennedy Center of Harvard University in early October 2017, Klaus Schwab boasted that Angela Merkel and Vladimir Putin were older proteges of the WEF Young Global Leaders [from 17 to 19 minutes], but that he was proud of his younger generation, such as the nefarious and indisputable globalist darling that is Justin Trudeau of Canada in “penetrating the cabinets.” Moreover, Zelensky worships the loathsome Justin Trudeau. And I think that Brannon for example, would not be aware of Putin being extolled by Schwab as one of his own in 2017. Of course today, Putin is playing his role as the pariah for our corrupt global mainstream media.

On Russia’s domestic front, Putin has been an advocate of COVID jab mandates, and in implementing Central Banking Digital currencies. And likewise, has been the case for Zelensky’s Ukraine.

Pro-Putinites in the West, like to say that our enemies are not in Russia, but rather in America itself pointing to say Hilary Clinton and George Soros. However, as I now segue into Israel, my research into my essay on the Israel-Hamas conflict revealed to me, that in regard to Israel, the agendas of the radical-leftist billionaire Globalist and self-loathing and pro-Hamas Jew that is the nefarious George Soros, and Vladimir Putin, are in very strong alignment to say the least. Putin’s English language mouthpiece Russia Today, certainly reflects this. [Search for “genocide”, accusing Israel of such.] And, more than once since October 7th 2023, Moscow has hosted high-level Hamas officials. [See also from the bottom of page 6 to 7.] And, as the icing on the cake, while the mostly anti-Semitic pro-Putinites love to call out Israel for the bombing and fake Gazan genocide, I have found from personal experience, they have no problem with Putin bombing civilians in Ukraine.

Much is made of the notion of the ex-KGB thug Putin as a now staunch anti-communist and devout Orthodox Christian. However, this is highly questionable at best. Firstly, at Sochi Russia in 2017, Putin to rousing applause, gave several speeches to gatherings at the World Youth Communist Convention.ⁱ Moreover, he has categorically stated his assertion that Christianity and Communism have many clear similarities,ⁱⁱ and the collapse of the Soviet Union as the greatest tragedy of the 20th century.ⁱⁱⁱ Moreover, David Satter, a former Moscow correspondent, says the Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill was exposed by material from the Soviet archives as a KGB agent. “This means he was more than just an informer, of whom there were millions in the Soviet Union. He was an active officer of the organization,” wrote Satter.^iv Moreover again, Putin’s deception of the West extends to is his cynical funding of Catastrophic Climate Change Scam environmental groups,^v while Russia is one of the world’s largest consumers and exporters of oil, coal and gas.^vi

Nevertheless, in spite of Russia having more than its fair share of corruption, such notions of Putin as the defender of traditional conservative Christian values are fuelled by chronic corruption that exists in the Ukraine, in spite of it being no worse than Russia’s,^vii and in America as indicated by its 2020 election fraud being buried by its Deep State and obsequiously complaint MSM.^viii And the then US vice-president Joe Creepy Sleepy Biden’s insistence on Ukraine in 2015, sacking their prosecutor Viktor Shokin investigating the corrupt energy company Burisma, to which his son Hunter, bereft of any experience in energy (well perhaps experience in “crack” energy), being on its board. To which Joe Creepy Sleepy Biden quipped; “Son of a bitch!” In other words, the Deep State in the West, is seemingly hindering Ukraine at every turn in cleaning up its corruption.

Before moving on to my final point relating to the potentially explosive revelations in regard to the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, I will briefly touch on the ideological cult of Nazbol/National Bolshevism or Duginism, as espoused by Alexander Dugin – himself closely linked to the Russian elite including Vladimir Putin himself.^ix [The 2019 Christchurch massacre was perpetrated by Brenton Tarrant – a disciple of Nazbol – but certainly not a supporter of Donald Trump as the corrupt global MSM tried to make out. See the second attached screenshot.] His father was also high up in Soviet intelligence. Dugin has a raging hatred for the West and its traditional NON-WOKE values – and indeed for Ukraine itself, bordering on genocidal.

I wrote about him in depth in my huge Russia-Ukraine blog article, but to suffice here in a Facebook post on August 25, 2014, Dugin posted the following, which translates from Russian to English as follows:

“Ukraine needs to be cleansed of idiots. A genocide of cretins begs consideration. Evil cretins, [whose minds are] closed to the voice of Logos, are deadly dangerous, and… with all of this, incredibly stupid. I don’t believe that these are Ukrainians. Ukrainians are a beautiful Slavic people. This is a kind of race of bastards, which appeared from sewer manholes.”^x

This from a member of the Russian elite proclaiming Putin’s agenda to “denazify” Ukraine! Then again, from personal experience and research, I do find many pro-Putinites to be anti-Semites. Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson for example.

I will end with an explosive revelation from the October 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, of which I was born in the very midst of on the 24th, and from which, could give the West and Ukraine, significantly more leverage in negotiating a peace settlement to this meat grinder of a war.

On April 30th, 2021, Joshua Philipp of The Epoch Times, on his Crossroads program, interviewed Julio Antonio del Marmol, the former Commander-in-Chief of the Young Commandos of the Rebel Army under Fidel Castro. Julio’s wealthy father had been a major funder of the Castro regime, naively believing that Fidel Castro’s regime was Cuba’s path to true “democracy”.

Julio, to the wrath of his father, began questioning his father, leading to his father branding him a traitor and throwing him out of their home. Feeling down, Julio informed his uncle about the situation. But to his surprise, Julio’s uncle then revealed himself as a master spy working for the international intelligence community, including the CIA. That was when Julio del Marmol joined his uncle’s spy network to become a brilliant, successful spy countering the communist oppression of Cuba. He was also the most hunted in Cuba. To which Julio stated, as documented in a May 2021 Epoch Times print story:

“I came to be an intelligence source to the West, so powerful that I sent the fresh pictures from the fresh missiles that Russia put in Cuba.”

And from about 31 minutes into the interview with Joshua, Julio states:

“The missiles never left Cuba!!!!”

AS

“The Soviet ships were never inspected!!!”

Hmmmm …. could this give Zelensky and the Trump administration some crucial leverage? In that pro-Putinites, in arguing against Ukrainian membership to NATO, constantly bang on that Russia would not want nuclear missiles on its doorsteps pointed at it, just like America would not want missiles pointed at it on its doorstep in Cuba? Hence, given that perhaps the 1962 Soviet nuclear missiles are still in Cuba, could one say to Putin, that if he wants to forbid Ukrainian membership to NATO, then he should pull the old 1962 nuclear missiles out of Cuba, and I think while he is at it, pull the Russian espionage center out of Nicaragua?

However; according to the May 2021 Epoch Times article, U.S. officials were not aware of the presence of nuclear tactical [battlefield] weapons when the agreement was made, so it covered only “offensive [strategic] weapons,” Svetlana Savranskaya wrote for the Wilson Center. It would also be hard to argue that tactical nuclear weapons were offensive due to their short range, she explained. In any case, nuclear weapons either tactical or strategic, Russia should be compelled to remove them.

And curiously, in a May 2022 interview with Jan Jekielek of The Epoch Times on his American Thought Leaders program from 30 minutes in, Andrei Illarionov; Putin’s economic advisor from 2000 to 2005, says that in 2003, Putin had no objection to Ukraine joining NATO!

From the transcript of this interview, I quote Andrei Illarionov:

“In 2002, there was a press conference by Mr. Putin and Mr. Kuchma, the president of Ukraine. The journalist asked, “Mr. Putin, could you tell us what would be your reaction to the potential membership of Ukraine in NATO?” The answer of Putin was, “It’s fine. It’s up to the Ukrainian people and up to the Ukrainian government whether to join or to not join NATO. We have no objections.””

But by 2007, according to Andrei Illarionov, Putin’s attitude changed. WHY? Illarionov is absolutely scathing of the duplicitous Biden regime, of which I provided an English translation, and indeed Aharon, as a patriotic Israeli, I’m sure you too, like Andrei, concur on the rank duplicity of the Biden-Harris regime in regard to the Israel-Hamas conflict! Moreover, it seems that the pro-Hamas Putin regime likewise, was just as uncomfortable with Andrei’s assessment.

Then in early August 2023, from 21 minutes and 20 seconds in on Joshua Philipp’s Q and A session during one of his Crossroad channel’s episodes, as kultured_yobbo, I referred to his late April 2021 interview with Julio, and asked Joshua if he thought their were still Soviet missiles in Cuba; to which Joshua answered in the affirmative. [See the first attached screenshot]

And in regard to Cuba sponsoring terrorism:

“He [Julio] added that Cuba has been the biggest sponsor of terrorism in the world. It harbors terrorists, manufactures terrorism, finances, and exports terrorism, he said.

Hijackers who took part in the 9/11 attack had been trained in a Cuban military base for almost a year before the attack, del Marmol revealed. Then they came to Florida for more “training” through the Canadian and Mexican borders to obtain pilot’s licenses, he said.

Financial support to terrorist operations sponsored by Cuba is now largely being provided by China, del Marmol said. He said this was made possible with the decision to incorporate a communist China into the world market, [on December 11th, 2001] which was a big mistake.”

Which perhaps implies Chinese funding indirectly of terrorism in the Middle East. To which, I think the Jordanian politician Mudar Zahran, would concur, as interviewed by Rabbi Pinchas Taylor on February the 15th, 2025.

And in further and concluding regard to Vladimir Putin, it was in November 2023, in the month just following October 7th, at the Mission of Israel to the WEF strategic partner that is the nefarious Globalist UN, Mosab Hassan Yousef, the son of Hamas, from 18 to 19 minutes in, stated:

“… Hamas gave the attacks on October 7th as a birthday gift to Putin …”

To which:

Heinrich Himmler was born in 1900.

Vladimir Putin was born in 1952.

To which Aharon, can you guess on which identical day and month of the calendar year they were born?

Anyway Aharon, I will keep on praying for you and Israel. So on that note, I will close.

Shabbat Shalom

Vince

To: South Western Sydney Local Health District Office

Street address:

Executive Support Office

Level 1, Building 21

52 Scrivener Street

WARWICK FARM NSW 2170

Postal address:

South Western Sydney Local Health District Executive Office

Locked Bag 7279

LIVERPOOL BC 1871

Phone: +61 2 8738 6000

Fax: +61 2 8738 6001

E-Mail: SWSLHD-ESU@health.nsw.gov.au

Hospital Switchboards

Bankstown Hospital +61 2 9722 8000

Bowral Hospital +61 2 4861 0200

Campbelltown and Camden Hospitals +61 2 4634 3000

Fairfield Hospital +61 2 9616 8111

Liverpool Hospital +61 2 8738 3000

Bankstown Hospital Scandal 10/02/2025 by Avi Yemini

Original 2 minute video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13A5uA6-WqA

Longer 11 minute video by Avi Yemini

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StJIKA-yya8

https://youtu.be/StJIKA-yya8?t=486

Sign Petition at https://terrordoctor.com

Subject: Education that seems to be badly in need for Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital given the rabid anti-Semitic rant of two of its medical staff based on their perception of false history.

PDF COPY

Saturday February 15, 2025

To: South Western Sydney Local Health District Office

[18 minute read.]

How are you? My name is Vince Barwinski and I’m a part-time author/researcher, based in Brisbane. Since the disturbing global rise of anti-Semitism in the wake of October 7^th 2023, and in part, motivated by the underlying story of my book, inspired in no small part by my autodidact father born in Poland in December 1923, but raised in Weimer Germany and Hitler’s Reich, I was compelled to write my huge essay on the Israel-Hamas conflict, which was completed while I was in Taiwan in March 2024. Then almost immediately following, via a curious set of circumstances, featured in a detailed article by Rhoda Wilson of the UK Exposé.

Hence, I was compelled to write to you after viewing the 11 minute YouTube presentation by the Rebel News Australia reporter Avi Yemini, with background information that revealed a disturbing uneducated culture of rabid anti-Semitism at the Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, that underlined the recent rant by two of their staff; namely Ahmad “Rashad” Nadir and Sarah Abu Lebdeh.

While I am pleased they were deregistered by the Nursing and Midwiferey Council of NSW, effective from February 13, 2025, I feel this incident should be investigated further, including as to why previous to which, whistleblowers alleging the underlying culture of anti-Semitism at the Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, were ignored and/or vilified.

Given the rant of Ahmad “Rashad” Nadir and Sarah Abu Lebdeh, it seems a fundamental pillar of their rabid anti-Semitism is their erroneous perception of the modern-day Palestinians being the indigenous inhabitants of the Gaza Strip.

And indeed, in my essay, titled I am a ZIONIST; but George Soros and the UN are NOT, from near the top of page 12 to page 16, I deal with this historic falsehood in depth, revealing its major underpinning of today’s anti-Semitism as chillingly embodied in the recent online rant of Ahmad “Rashad” Nadir and Sarah Abu Lebdeh.

But to summarise; the name Palestine derives from Philistia, the name given by Greek writers to the land of the Philistines – originally from the Aegean Sea, who in the 12^th Century BC, about the time of the arrival of the Israelites, occupied a small pocket of land on the southern coast, between modern-day Tel Aviv–Yafo and Gaza. (Roughly corresponding with the territory of the modern-day Gaza Strip. Certainly nowhere near anything like what modern-day Israel encompasses.)ⁱ By 1,000 BC, the Israelite kingdom under King David and his son Solomon, even encompassed the modern-day Syrian capital of Damascus to the north and beyond, and well east of the River Jordan and the Dead Sea into modern-day Jordan.ⁱⁱ The name was revived by the Romans in the 2^nd century AD as “Syria Palaestina,” (Roman Palestine)ⁱⁱⁱ, in place of its original name of Judea, in the wake of the Jewish Bar Kokhba Revolt of 132-135 AD, designating the southern portion of the province of Syria, and made its way thence into Arabic, where it has been used to describe the region at least since the early Islamic era.

Put another way, the Romans, after two major revolts from the Jews in 70 AD and the 130s AD, had in order to spite the Jews, renamed Judea after its ancient mortal enemies the Philistines. This in spite of the fact, that the Philistines had disappeared from historical written record about six to seven centuries earlier, when the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar II (reign ca. 605 BC – c. 562 BC) conquered the region and destroyed several cities, including Ashkelon. Thus, this Roman province had nothing to do with the modern day Palestinian state, either geographically or ethnically. Moreover, this piece of essential history, puts paid to the ludicrous notion of Jesus being a Palestinian! As indeed espoused it seems, by Jorge Mario Bergoglio – the Marxist-Apostate Pope Francis.

To which, coupled with no genetic link between the ancient Philistines and modern-day Palestinians, unlike the definitive genetic links established between ancient Jews of around the time of the 70 AD Jerusalem siege and modern-day Jews, as documented in the 2010 study by the The American Society of Human Genetics, begs the question; “Where are modern-day Palestinians from and when did they arrive?”

Well, to begin with, the modern-day Palestinians are a mixed people of whom the majority descend from recent economic migrants, who flocked to the area between 1850 and 1950. A few Muslim families trace their history to the Arab conquest of Jerusalem in the 7^th century, and some Jewish and Christian families go even back further. However, very few Palestinian Arabs are indigenous^iv – Arabs are not indigenous to the Israel and unsurprisingly, they originated from Arabia before they arrived in the Israel with the Muslim conquests of the 7^th century, taking over from the rule of the Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Empire.

Certainly up until 1948, when since Christ’s time, the region was ruled by various empires including the Roman, Byzantine (Eastern Roman), various Islamic Caliphates, the Turkish Ottoman Empire from 1516-1917, before the British captured Jerusalem in late December 1917 and occupied it until its mandate ended in May 1948. Never at any stage, from the time of Jesus until May 1948, did anything like a truly independent Palestinian state exist. And when it did as perhaps the land of “Philistia” of the Aegean-descended Philistines, at around the time of say King David, never was it anything like the area encompassing modern-day Israel. Rather, more like the area of the modern-day Gaza Strip.

To which, it is interesting to note, that the word “Israel” is mentioned sixty times in the Quran,^v but “Palestine” and the third holiest city in Islam – namely “Jerusalem”,^vi never,^vii while the two holiest cities^viii of “Mecca” (Makka)^ix and “Medina”^x are. Moreover, neither is the word “Philistia” written in the Quran,^xi although Philistia is mentioned ten times in the Old Testament of the the Bible as either the land of “Philistia” or its people the “Philistines”.^xii

Moreover, prominent members of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation – PLO, have admitted that the state of “Palestine” and its “Palestinian” people were indeed, a political construct specifically designed to undermine the modern-day state of Israel. To begin with, Zuheir Mohsen; the Military Department head of the PLO^xiii from 1971 to 1979,^xiv in an interview with the Dutch newspaper Trouw, on March 31^st, 1977,^xv stated:

“There are no differences between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese. We are all part of one nation. It is only for political reasons that we carefully underline our Palestinian identity…. yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity serves only tactical purposes. The founding of a Palestinian state is a new tool in the continuing battle against Israel.”^xvi

Zuheir Mohsen was born in 1936 in Ṭulkarm of then British mandated Palestine in the modern-day West Bank. He was assassinated on July 26^th, 1979, in Nice, France; shot in the head by gunmen on his way home from the Palm Beach Casino in Cannes.

And from no less than the late Jordanian King Hussein bin Talal from 1952 until his death in 1999, as he proclaimed at the Arab League summit in 1987 in the Jordanian capital of Amman:

“The appearance of the Palestinian national personality comes as an answer to Israel’s claim that Palestine is Jewish.”^xvii

As Martin Sherman^xviii put it:

“King Hussein of Jordan conceded that Palestinian identity was merely a response to Jewish national claims and was not driven by any authentic endogenic sentiment of uniqueness.”^xix

… From this, we are compelled to conclude that, if there were no Jewish claims to ‘Palestine,’ there would be no Palestinian Arab claims. Therefore, these claims are merely a derivative of Jewish claims, without which they would not exist.”^xx

Conversely, unlike the relatively recent and contrived identity of Palestine and the Palestinians, is it not worth pondering, how remarkable it is, that after almost two millennia of displacement and trauma, the Jewish culture, religion and identity has persisted, when almost any other, would have ceased to exist? Certainly, an inexorably disturbing, nagging and annoying question for any raving anti-Semite. Not the least of which being, those chanting “gas the Jews” at your Opera House just a day or two in the wake of the horrors of October 7^th 2023.

Hence, it is at this point, that the opportunity for a poignant segue, explaining the presence of the name “George Soros” in the title of my essay has presented itself. Namely, that since 2016, groups behind the Israel-bashing protests backing the October 7^th 2023 Hamas attacks, have received in excess of $16 million from the radical-left nominal-Jewish-Hungarian-American Billionaire and Globalist George Soros,^xxi of whom, many anti-Semites, due to Soros’ Jewish heritage, perceive of him being a staunch pro-Zionist. The actions however of Soros, and the documents on his websites, clearly suggest otherwise.

Moreover, it’s worth mentioning that the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) headed by Yasser Arafat, was himself in the early 1960s, tasked by the Soviet KGB disinformation department to create and head a terrorist group named Fatah.^xxii Subsequent to which, in the aftermath of the 1967 Six Day Arab-Israeli War, the KGB manoeuvred to catapult him as chairman of the PLO.^xxiii Indeed, the Egyptian ruler and Soviet puppet, Gamal Abdel Nasser, publicly proposed the appointment.^xxiv

Moreover, it’s worth noting, that what today we would refer to as Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and West Bank, had no objection back in 1948-67, to being considered part of Egypt and Jordan respectively. In other words, no bellowing then of occupation in the “Palestinian” territories when they were under the control of the Muslim-Arab nations of Egypt and Jordan.

The other dubious claim from Ahmad and Sarah’s rant, was their reference to members of the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) being wanton child killers in the Gaza war. But what they do not mention, is the wanton exploitation by Hamas of civilian occupants, including women and children, of schools, hospitals and the like as human shields, because for Hamas, dead civilians are of great propaganda value for a naive, gullible and corrupt-leftist-mainstream-media–indoctrinated Western audience.

For example, on January 3^rd 2024, the Israeli government released a video interview of a Gaza civilian who said a Hamas operative herded his group into Al Shifa Hospital when they were trying to follow IDF instructions to flee south. Terrorists were living under the hospital, but knowing Israeli soldiers were coming, they emerged and hid among the civilians. “I felt that we are human shields,” the civilian said. The Israeli military said on Jan. 3 that it had dismantled an 800-foot [244 metre] tunnel underneath Al Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, which the nefarious UN agency of UNRWA operates. [In regard to the nefarious UN agency that is UNRWA, search for “UNRWA” in my essay.]

In short, in direct contradiction to Ahmad and Sarah’s rant, Israel tries its best to limit civilian casualties, while Hamas, for propaganda purposes, for a corrupt-leftist-mainstream-media–indoctrinated Western audience, attempts to maximize them.

Moreover, claims of inordinately high Gazan civilian casualties in the war, have been proven questionable to say the least, given that the main source for the data, has been the highly questionable Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry, which by March 7^th, 2024, claimed more than 30,000 dead, the majority of which it says are children and women.^xxv

“Questionable” here being the operative word of understatement, given the bombing of the Al-Ahli Arab hospital in mid-October 2023, when Hamas claimed Israel had levelled Al-Ahli Arab hospital with an airstrike, eliciting outrage from around the world as its allies screamed war crime and the media rushed to prop up Hamas’ story. For example, “Pravda On The Hudson” – New York Times has been reported as doing as such by the no less left-leaning Politico, before being forced to hastily alter their story.

And as Abraham Wyner, Professor of Statistics and Data Science at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and Faculty Co-Director of the Wharton Sports Analytics and Business Initiative documented;

“Here’s the problem with this data: The numbers are not real. That much is obvious to anyone who understands how naturally occurring numbers work. The casualties are not overwhelmingly women and children, and the majority may be Hamas fighters. If Hamas’ numbers are faked or fraudulent in some way, there may be evidence in the numbers themselves that can demonstrate it. While there is not much data available, there is a little, and it is enough: From Oct. 26 until Nov. 10, 2023, the Gaza Health Ministry released daily casualty figures that include both a total number and a specific number of women and children.”

In summing up, Abraham Wyner puts it as follows:

“Taken together, what does this all imply? While the evidence is not dispositive, it is highly suggestive that a process unconnected or loosely connected to reality was used to report the numbers. Most likely, the Hamas ministry settled on a daily total arbitrarily. We know this because the daily totals increase too consistently to be real. Then they assigned about 70% of the total to be women and children, splitting that amount randomly from day to day. Then they in-filled the number of men as set by the predetermined total. This explains all the data observed.”

AND …

“The truth can’t yet be known and probably never will be. The total civilian casualty count is likely to be extremely overstated. Israel estimates that at least 12,000 fighters have been killed. If that number proves to be even reasonably accurate, then the ratio of noncombatant casualties to combatants is remarkably low: at most 1.4 to 1 and perhaps as low as 1 to 1. By historical standards of urban warfare, where combatants are embedded above and below into civilian population centers, this is a remarkable and successful effort to prevent unnecessary loss of life while fighting an implacable enemy that protects itself with civilians.”

I will wrap up this letter with this final point. Namely, that in August to September 2005, Israel completely withdrew from the Gaza Strip in the spirit of their 1978-79 Camp David Peace Treaty with Egypt embodying the concept of “land for peace”. In the process, even Jewish graves were removed!

Some, such as the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, naively predicted or hoped that by reconciling with their Palestinian political rivals in Fatah, Hamas would become more responsive to its own public and ultimately a more moderate movement, but that did not happen. Indeed, in June 2006 Hamas operatives penetrated into Israel via tunnels dug from Gaza, ambushed an Israeli border patrol, killing two soldiers and injuring two more, and kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. Hamas would hold Shalit captive for five years, releasing him in exchange for the release of 1,027 Palestinians held in Israeli jails.

From the 10^th to the 15^th of June 2007, the Battle of Gaza, also referred to as the Hamas’ takeover of Gaza, took place. It was a military conflict between the rival Palestinian factions Fatah (As just mentioned, Fatah was founded by Arafat under KGB behest in the early 1960s)^xxvi and Hamas. It was a prominent event in the Fatah–Hamas conflict, centered on the struggle for power after Fatah lost the 2006 Palestinian legislative election, but refused to duly acknowledge the result. The battle resulted in the dissolution of the unity government and the de facto division of the Palestinian territories into two entities: the West Bank (historically Jewish Judea and Samaria) governed by the Palestinian National Authority (PNA), and the Gaza Strip governed by Hamas. Hamas fighters took control of the Gaza Strip, while Fatah officials were either taken as prisoners, executed, or expelled. The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights reported that at least 161 people were killed and more than 700 were wounded during the fighting.^xxvii

By December 2008 Hamas initiated the first in a series of rocket wars with Israel. By 2015, after three rounds of rocket wars, some still assessed that Hamas would prioritize survival over “resistance” (i.e. fighting Israel) and placed hope in periodic efforts to reconcile Fatah and Hamas, each of which failed as Hamas refused to give up its arms and abide by peace process commitments.

Moreover, it was unlimited Western funding made available to Gaza, that in no small measure, greatly facilitated Hamas’ never-ending Jihad against Israel, as proclaimed in The 1988 Covenant Of The Islamic Resistance Movement – Hamas as:

“Israel will exist, and will continue to exist, until Islam abolishes it, as it abolished that which was before it. [From the words of] The martyr, Imam Hasan al-Banna’, Allah’s mercy be upon him.”

AND:

“Humiliation is their lot wherever they may be, except where they are saved from it by a bond with Allah or by a bond with men.”^xxviii

AND:

“The hour of judgment shall not come until the Muslims fight the Jews and kill them, so that the Jews hide behind trees and stones, and each tree and stone will say: ‘Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him, except for the Gharqad tree, for it is the tree of the Jews.’ (Recorded in the Hadith collections of Bukhari and Muslim).”

In short; Hamas remained committed to its core principle of prioritizing the destruction of Israel over the well-being of Palestinian civilians, as embodied in its global context as:

“The issue is never the issue, but rather Jihad until the ‘paradise’ of the Global Caliphate.”

To which; Hamas can never again be allowed to rule in Gaza or for that matter, anywhere else. Indicative of which being the burning question:

“Why does Egypt refuse to accept any Gazan refugees,^xxix in spite of Gaza being Egyptian territory before the 1967 Six Day war,^xxx and in spite of the fact that Egypt already hosts 9 million immigrants and foreigners from various countries in the Middle East and Africa?”^xxxi

All the best and God Bless

Vince Barwinski

To: Ruggero Schleicher Tappeser: ruggero@schleicher-tappeser.eu

Tobias Korenke: tobiaskorenke@aol.com

Tobias Bonhoeffer: office.bonhoeffer@bi.mpg.de

My January 3rd 2025 message to the Bonhoeffer 86.

My message to Washington DC Episcopalian Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde.

PDF COPY

UPDATED SATURDAY 01 FEBRUARY 2025

Subject: Questions on Benjamin Netanyahu and the Von Trapps and my comments on I imagine your hero; the Washington DC Episcopalian Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde.

Dear Gentleman

After watching Glen Beck’s interview of Eric Metaxas on November 24, 2024 at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPOyq7rsPzc

and hearing Eric Metaxas’ comment on you from 55 minutes, in relation to HAMAS; I am most curious as to what your answer would be to the following question:

“If Benjamin Netanyaho landed in Germany, do you think, in line with the order from the International Criminal Court, German authorities should arrest him?”

To which, I think you will find the following on the ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan, most poignant:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWdrjjD_vy0

If you do indeed support the arrest of Benjamin Netanyahu, I suggest you read the following article by Jonathan Tobin; editor-in-chief of the Jewish News Syndicate:

Zero tolerance for empty words of Holocaust remembrance

In particular, I think his following words written on January 26, 2025 – the day before the 81^st anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, ring most poignantly true as they evoke Matthew Chapter 7 verse 3:

“This is just another example of how much of the world likes dead Jews but is utterly intolerant of live ones, who are prepared to fight for their rights and their existence.”

I have also attached my January 3rd message to you all again, but as well, my message to Washington DC Episcopalian Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde and my comments on her recent Biblically bastardized Cultural neo-Marxist WOKE sermon to undermine the legitimately elected Presidency of Donald J. Trump and promote the Globalist agenda of unelected bureaucrats of the World Economic Forum and its strategic partner the United Nations.

Invariably, you all get a prominent mention, so I thought you would be most curious to read it.

And one final question:

“Do you think the famous von Trapp Family in 1938, crossed the Alps into Switzerland to escape free speech?”

To which; I wonder what JD Vance would have to say?

All the best and God Bless

Vince Barwinski

I think Donald J. Trump’s bravery inexorably exceeds any superficial bravery of I imagine your hero; the WOKE Cultural neo-Marxist Washington DC Episcopalian Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde!

Posted in 0 Comments

To: Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde

https://edow.org/staff-directory/

“Have Mercy”: Watch Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde’s WOKIE-WOKE Sermon Challenging Trump at Inaugural Service

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNfrbAztlcs

mebudde@edow.org

PDF COPY

Saturday January 25, 2025

Subject: Your recent Biblically bastardized Cultural neo-Marxist WOKE sermon to undermine the legitimately elected Presidency of Donald J. Trump and promote the Globalist agenda of unelected bureaucrats of the World Economic Forum and its strategic partner the United Nations.

Dear Bishop

[11 minute read]

How are you? My name is Vince Barwinski, and I’m the author of the 2021-22 book The Pastor and the Matriarch of the German Underground and Their Times – A Polish Perspective and a Traditional Latin Mass Catholic of Polish descent, who loves Israel and is based in Brisbane Australia.

Recently I heard your sermon on Tuesday 21 January delivered at the National Cathedral in Washington DC to ostensibly honor the inauguration of the duly elected President Donald J. Trump, but in truth, was a Biblically bastardized Cultural neo-Marxist WOKE sermon to undermine the newly inaugurated Presidency of Donald J. Trump and promote the Globalist agenda of unelected bureaucrats of the World Economic Forum and its strategic partner the United Nations.

The YouTube channel of the Cultural neo-Marxist media outlet DEMOCRACY NOW! most predictably lauded and spoke most glowingly of your sermon, compelling me two to three days ago to leave a comment as user “kulturedyobbo” explaining how your sermon was blatant WOKE bastardization of scripture. Rather predictably, my comment has since been removed, and when I try to repost it, and reload the page, I now find it instantly removed. To which, given your WOKE Cultural neo-Marxist mindset, as epitomized by your sermon, and your support of the idolatrous Gaia Earth worshipping Season of Creation Cult, which I spoke out publicly against during a Novus Mundi Ordo (New World Order) Catholic service on September 22, would most certainly approve of! Thus compelling me to quote it to you now as follows in GREEN:

“God, unlike this woman, and the first Globalist that was Nimrod, is NOT a Globalist.

Yes … many WOKE theologians [such as Jorge Mario Bergoglio – the so-called WOKE Cultural neo-Marxist/Globalist apostate POPE and this woman] claim God wants open borders, but they ignore biblical context and misquote Scripture, trying to make the Bible say something that makes them look [or feel] good. Moses, representing the Old Testament law and Paul, representing the New Testament, both agree that borders are ordained by God.

‘When the Most High divided their inheritance to the nations, when He separated the sons of Adam, He set the boundaries of the peoples according to the number of the children of Israel.’

– Deuteronomy 32:8

In the ancient world, sacred texts show that countries or empires had borders and recognized citizens, non-citizens, visitors and resident aliens. Each people acknowledged the importance of obtaining permission to reside in a foreign land, and understood the rights and responsibilities of living in someone else’s nation. The Bible addresses borders at least forty-three times.

‘From one man He made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and He marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands.’

– Acts 17:26

Moreover, in regards to the crumbling American southern border facilitating child trafficking, no less poignant to note, is the July 10th 2024 press release by Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin:

‘On Tuesday [July 9th 2024], U.S. Sen Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, participated in a roundtable titled, ‘The Exploitation Crisis: How the U.S. Government is Failing to Protect Migrant Children from Trafficking and Abuse.’ Sen. Johnson called out the Biden administration for failing to protect migrant children at the border who have been exploited and abused due to the inhumanity of this administration’s open border.’”

I indeed document all this on pages 28 to 29 of:

My objections to the October 2024 Open Letter: “Descendants: Do not distort and misuse Dietrich Bonhoeffer!

… with key search terms given on the opening page.

In October 2024, 86 of exactly 100 surviving adult descendants of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, of whom I will henceforth refer to as the “Bonhoeffer 86”, wrote a letter titled Descendants: Do not distort and misuse Dietrich Bonhoeffer!, in response to the Angel Studios movie; Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin released in America on November 24, 2024.

Their motivation for doing so, being their perception of the Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin movie being a far-right-wing distortion of the legacy of the German anti-Nazi Lutheran Pastor; Dietrich Bonhoeffer, which has been endorsed by the Trump supporter and Bonhoeffer author Eric Metaxas who wrote in 2010, his book on Dietrich Bonhoeffer titled Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy A righteous Gentile vs, the Third Reich, which sold more than a million copies in 20 languages.

Hence, given the fact, that Eric Metaxas’ book was a major source for my own book on Dietrich Bonhoeffer, titled The Pastor and the Matriarch of the German Underground and Their Times – A Polish Perspective, published in January 2022, I was naturally compelled to write a huge rebuttal piece to three of the Bonhoeffer 86.

The first of whom being; Tobias Bonhoeffer, the director at the Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology in Martinsried Germany, who since July 2014, has been a member of the Board of Governors of the Wellcome Trust! According to its Annual Report and Financial Statements 2020, it describes itself as such:

“The Wellcome Trust (Wellcome) is an independent, global, charitable foundation created in 1936 by the will of Sir Henry Wellcome. It is now a registered charity, governed by its Constitution, established in February 2001 by a scheme of the Charity Commission and subsequently amended.”

This may sound innocuous enough, except when one scans their their 2020 Annual Report, you find it is intimately linked to nefarious Globalist entities. Namely, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum, who were both in 2020, in co-operation with the governments of Germany, Japan, India and Norway, instrumental in founding CEPI – the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. I deal with the nefarious Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the latter’s strategic partner the United Nations, in my August 2023 submission against the Marxist Australian Federal Government’s Communications Legislation Amendment (Combating Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2023 and in my letter to the Bonhoeffer 86.

The other two signatories I have written to, are the initiators of the Bonhoeffer 86 open-letter, of whom, their email addresses are given at the bottom of every page. They are as follows:

1) Ruggero Schleicher-Tappeser, political advisor, entrepreneur, and theorist in the fields of energy, transport, sustainability, climate, and regional development. The word “climate” of course referring to the fake climate crisis [My personal cellphone ringtone!] that embodies the Globalist-engineered Catastrophic Climate Change Scam (CCCS).

Indicative of which being, when I looked for keynote “speakers” on “climate” on the Speaker Associate website, I found Ruggero at the bottom-right of the page, listed with illustrious figures in the middle of it such as the former New Zealand Prime Minister and Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum Jacinda Adern [now only available on the WayBack machine, like so many other pieces of evidence], of whom I remember in 2022, being the one in implementing the tax on the farts and burps of cows and livestock in general!! Compelling me to write, in my Globalist-agenda debunking piece of Aussie impudence to Ruggero on page 11:

“Fair Dinkum!! Only selbst-wichtige Idiot [self-important idiot] politicians and ‘intellectuals’ could conceive of such conceptual verbal diarrhea!”

And …

“Moreover, does not Jacinta’s tax on flatulent cows, give new meaning to your fake crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change (CCC) Cash Cow?”

2) Tobias Korenke, who has studied history, politics, philosophy and public law in Freiburg and Oxford and completed his doctorate. Today he is the head of corporate & public affairs at the FUNKE media group and one of the scholars of the The International Bonhoeffer Society – which according to its Mission Statement, seems to embrace the Globalist agenda, given its pillars of “Fighting nationalisms”, implying elimination of national borders, and “Protecting the earth” – the latter implying its commitment to promulgating the Globalist-engineered CCCS. And in regard to the former, namely “Fighting nationalisms”, implying elimination of national borders, which to reiterate, I rightly discussed as being inherently un-Biblical in this message to you, and in my detailed and in-depth objection to the Bonhoeffer 86 open-letter on pages 28 to 29, of which I left key search terms on the opening page. Further to which, given your sermon, most poignant are:

“Guatemala”, “320,000”, “212,000”, “border”, “Dominion”.

In closing Bishop, given your mention of it in your sermon, I should briefly mention the LGBTIQ issue.

If someone wishes to be gay, that is their business. However, I do not require the fact to be rammed down my throat incessantly. Andy Ngo [from page 8], the brave author of Unmasked Inside Antifa’s Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy, is indeed gay, but does not see the need to have the fact rammed down everyone’s throat incessantly, as he rightly sees his mission to expose the agenda of the WOKE Cultural neo-Marxists such as yourself, infinitely more compelling. Likewise Douglas Murray, of whom especially since October 7, 2023, has been admirably vocal in his defense of Israel and his condemnation of the vile anti-Semitism now running rampant in the West among both the far right and radical-left. As well indeed, has Andy Ngo.

However, the “T” in LGBTIQ espousing the so-called “trans-agenda” and the devastating consequences of its indoctrination perpetrated upon our children, denying basic biological reality and fundamental Biblical doctrine, is nothing short of Satanic.

Hence, men cannot have babies!! And women and girls cannot have penises!! And the consequences of trans-surgery, with its dangerous puberty blockers, are not reversible!

Eight-year-old children who suddenly feel they are of the wrong gender, should not be unconditionally gender-affirmed by their poor parents, as is the case in the WOKE basket cases of Gavin Newsome’s Wokifornia and Justin Trudeau’s Canada.

If an adult man or woman wishes to delude themselves into thinking they can transgender into the opposite sex, then fine. However, I am not compelled in any way shape or form, in the face of fundamental biological reality and Biblical doctrine, to acknowledge it as truth.

I will however, acknowledge it as another Cultural neo-Marixist WOKE dialectic to undermine fundamental pillars of our Western Civilization, including Christianity itself. While class was a potent dialectic in a crumbling Tsarist Russia of 1917 and Mao Zedong’s China of 1949, it never has really been so in America and my Australia, to which the dialectics of race, as was indeed the case for the Jews scapegoated in Hitler’s National Socialist Third Reich,¹ and more chillingly today in the West; gender, have proven infinitely more potent. Indeed, dare one look no further than one of the final lines of the 1848 Communist Manifesto:

“The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.”²

… to segue into my closing two questions to you:

1) “Do you, in the spirit of Vladimir Lenin’s concept of the majority ‘Useful Idiots’, flying in the face of plain common sense and reality, truly believe in the philosophy of Cultural neo-Marxist WOKEISM, rooted in the philosophy of the ultimate deadbeat³ that was the Satanist⁴ and self-loathing Jew Karl Marx, magically manifesting itself as a wondrous utopia of man?”

…. OR

2) “Are you in the minority of the truly malevolent 5%, in the true spirit of the 1848 Communist Manifesto, striving for;

‘the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions,’ to ultimately obliterate Christianity and manifest Satan’s agenda of Hell on Earth?”

I would be truly fascinated to read your thoughts!

May God save your soul!

Yours Sincerely

Vince Barwinski

To: Ruggero Schleicher-Tappeser

ruggero@schleicher-tappeser.eu

Friday January 03rd, 2025

Subject: Updated attached message in regard to your open letter “Descendants: Do not distort and misuse Dietrich Bonhoeffer!” and my objections to it.

PDF COPY OF FULL MESSAGE

My follow up message to the Bonhoeffer 86 on January 26 2025

Dear Ruggero

I have covered three additional points in this updated attachment in regard to your open letter:

“Descendants: Do not distort and misuse Dietrich Bonhoeffer!”

1) On Jordon Trishton Walker,ⁱ Director, Worldwide R&D Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning at Pfizer in New York City in January 2023. Pages 16 to 17.

2) When Senator John Neely Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, in February 2023, briefly but very revealingly grilled two esteemed Climate Change experts; Dr. Robert Litterman, Founding partner Kepos Capital Chair, Climate Related Market Risk Subcommittee U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Dr. Douglas Holz-Eakin, President of The American Action Forum.ⁱⁱ Bottom of Page 30 to 33

3) The awe inspiring speech by the Jewish Holocaust survivor; Vera Sharav in Nuremberg on the 75th anniversary of the Nuremberg Code on the 20th of August 2022ⁱⁱⁱ Pages 22 to 24.

How are you? My name is Vince Barwinski, and I’m the author of the 2021-22 book The Pastor and the Matriarch of the German Underground and Their Times – A Polish Perspective and a Traditional Latin Mass Catholic of Polish descent, who loves Israel and is based in Brisbane Australia.

The central characters of my book are your Great Uncle Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Junker matriarch Ruth von-Kleist who came to regard Dietrich like a son.

The inspiration for my book was one manifested over years but initiated on a miserable winter’s afternoon on February 12th, 2005, as shown on the front cover of my book. Namely the bronze cross memorial to your Great Uncle Dietrich Bonhoeffer in the modern-day Polish city of Wrocław (pronounced “Vrotswav”), but pre-WWII German Breslau and birthplace of Dietrich on February 4th, 1906. Given the centuries of bad blood between Germany and Poland, finding a monument to a German in a modern-day Polish city, was for myself, rather remarkable.

To which, it was only in the wake of the Cold War in the late 1990s, that this monument to Dietrich was erected and unveiled, and it was the dual history of this city and my amateur passion for history, fostered by my autodidact Polish-born father in early December 1923, raised in Weimar Germany and Hitler’s Reich, in particular, his knowledge of WWII history of Europe, that inspired me to write of Dietrich Bonhoeffer from a hitherto, unique Polish perspective, with lessons of history still relevant in today’s world. Not the least of which being, the religious oppression and subversion in Xi Jinping’s China, and the rise of the radical left in America in 2020-21, mirroring in many respects, the 1966-76 Cultural Revolution of Mao Zedong’s Communist China, and most eerily for me, the rise of Hitler’s Reich amidst a crumbling Weimar Germany, to which I devoted my belatedly written Chapter 29 – Dietrich and Ruth and their Times Relevance for America in 2020-21 — Lessons of History.

More than eleven years following my weekend visit to Wrocław, it was in August 2016, I commenced writing my book on Dietrich Bonhoeffer from a unique Polish perspective. Before long, it came to encompass the remarkable Junker matriarch Ruth von Kleist, sharing the same birthday with Dietrich in 1867, who came to regard Dietrich like a son, and her clan. To the best of my knowledge, this is only the second book in English, dealing in depth with Ruth and her brave Prussian Junker clan, and their relationship with Dietrich.

Moreover, as the Junker lands between the wars bordered Poland’s Second Republic, the scope for my Polish perspective was significantly enhanced, adding to the significance of my four Polish WWII Supplemental chapters dealing with the late August 1939 Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, then on its heels, Hitler’s flimsy but still ultimately effective false flag of the Gleiwitz (Gliwice) Incident for pretext to invade Poland, followed by the Stalinist-perpetrated April-May 1940 Katyń Wood Massacre and finally; “Polish WWII Supplement IV: AK and 1944 Warsaw General Uprising — Stalin’s mass murder by German proxy”. (See my chapter by chapter description. AK was the Polish Armia Krajowa – Home Army – the dominant resistance movement in German-occupied Poland during World War II. It was of course anti-communist and dwarfed the communist Armia Ludowa – “People’s” Army. See page 183 of Rising ’44: The Battle for Warsaw Reprint Edition (October 4, 2005), ISBN-10: 0143035401, ISBN-13: 9780143035404.)

In your co-signed October 2024 letter “Descendants: Do not distort and misuse Dietrich Bonhoeffer!”, you raised issues with Eric Metaxas and his 2010 biography Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy A righteous Gentile vs, the Third Reich, such as it supposedly ignoring the historical context and misrepresenting Dietrich as a fundamentalist Evangelical. You also raised the legitimate objection of the character of Dietrich at one stage in the movie, pointing a gun. Which I have to say, I wholeheartedly agree that such a notion is preposterous.

However, as I wrote from the beginning of Chapter 29 of my book, Ferdinand Schlingensiepen, author of Dietrich Bonhoeffer 1906-1945: Martyr, Thinker, Man of Resistance, which is one the four premiere sources for my book, wrote an English language article in 2015 on the official Bonhoeffer website titled Making Assumptions About Dietrich: How Bonhoeffer was Made Fit for America. (When I accessed this article in February 2021, it was still available. Curiously however, at the time of writing this letter to you, I could only access it on the Web Archive.)

The title of Ferdinand’s article can perhaps be generalised to: “Made fit for the English Speaking World.” He was born in 1929 and post-war was a close friend of Eberhard Bethge — of whom I imagine, you are more than aware of, was Dietrich’s closest friend. Eberhard died in 2000, but as far as I can tell, Ferdinand is still alive at the time of writing, aged 95. He spent crucial years of his childhood in an illegal Confessing Church seminary that his father led until his arrest.

In Ferdinand’s 2015 article, he is critical of the American conservative author and radio presenter Eric Metaxas, but as well, the liberal author Charles Marsh, a liberal theologian from Virginia and author of Strange Glory, A Life of Dietrich Bonhoeffer published in 2014. Metaxas’ book is the most prominent source for my book, closely followed by Ferdinand’s book and then Eberhard Bethge’s giant biography. After I found and read Ferdinand’s 2015 article in 2016, I started to thoroughly vet my citations of Eric Metaxas, and in my book, the majority of my citations of Eric Metaxas are accompanied by other sources, often those of Ferdinand or Eberhard. Charles Marsh I never used in my book, and indeed, while Ferdinand was critical of Eric Metaxas, he was even more so for Charles Marsh. To summarise, this is how Ferdinand saw Metaxas and Marsh:

“Marsh and Metaxas have dragged Bonhoeffer into cultural and political disputes that belong in a U.S. context. The issues did not present themselves in the same way in Germany in Bonhoeffer’s time, and the way they are debated in Germany today differs greatly from that in the States. Metaxas has focused on the fight between right and left in the United States and has made Bonhoeffer into a likeable arch-conservative without theological insights and convictions of his own; Marsh concentrates on the conflict between the Conservatives and the gay rights’ movement. Both approaches are equally misguided and are used to make Bonhoeffer interesting and relevant to American society. Bonhoeffer does not need this and it certainly distorts the facts.”

and…

“Unlike Metaxas, Charles Marsh does know some German. He has read Bonhoeffer’s writings in the original and has carried out research in Germany. He served briefly as a ‘Bonhoeffer guest professor’ at Humboldt University in Berlin. Even so, his manuscript needed more substantial corrections than that of Metaxas before being published in Germany.”

In essence, what I am saying, is that one could argue both liberal and conservative agenda driven American books on Dietrich Bonhoeffer, can at the very least, in the eyes of of a German author very close to Dietrich’s best friend Eberhard Bethge, be equally misguided.

However, unlike 2015 when Ferdinand wrote his article, and rather than “democracies” such as the DPRK – Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the former – DDR – Deutsche Demokratische Republik, epitomised by its Stasi secret police, surpassing in sheer size, even the Gestapo of the entire National Socialist Germany of your Great Uncle Dietrich’s time, the American Constitutional Republic – NOT the democracy, from the summer of 2020, was itself was under dire threat. Whereupon disturbing parallels with the death throes of Weimar Germany from Dietrich and Ruth’s time, can be drawn. However, as I will explain, it requires one take off their blinkers in regard to evil perpetrated by the political radical-left. In short, break free from the myopic leftist-Globalist echo chamber promulgated by corrupt agenda driven global-leftist mainstream media, characterised by its deafening silence to violence perpetrated by violent radical-left entities such as Antifa and Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO) during the summer of 2020. [Read pages 8, 9 and 10 then see this three minute video. Note the names of Steff Yorek and Jess Sundin from FRSO.]

PDF COPY OF FULL MESSAGE

Yours Sincerely

Vince Barwinski

To: The New York Times – Pravda On The Hudson

https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014925288-Submit-a-Letter-to-The-Editor

https://www.nytco.com/company/people/

editorial@nytimes.com (Joseph Kahn)

letters@nytimes.com

Sunday 31^st March 2024

Subject: Your reporting on the CCP and how it relates to your projection of the overall picture of world events.

Dear Joseph

Recently on Epoch TV I watched a compelling and meticulously researched episode of Joshua Philipp’s Crossroads channel titled “How New York Times Distorted Coverage of Genocide”.

In particular, Joshua raised concerns with your curious term “Forced Human Organ Donations” in regard to Chinese Communist Party (CCP) sponsored forced human organ HARVESTING – NOT DONATIONS.

This got me thinking. Are you all at The New York Times, essentially; “Pravda, CCP or MARXISTS on The Hudson” beholden to Satan? Karl Marx indeed wrote:

“With Satan I have struck my deal. He chalks the signs, beats the time for me. I play the death march fast and free.”

I indeed quote this at the end of my recently completed essay on the Israel-Hamas conflict on page 41. Moreover, in the footnote at the bottom of page 25, you get a mention in my essay in regard to your hastily retracted pro-Hamas article in mid-October 2023. Why did you remove it when it highlights with prodigious neon-light clarity, your true agenda??

My essay was also discussed on the UK outlet The Expose. You will note I make prodigious reference to George Soros, to which, I am also curious; “Are you funded by George Soros?” See my quote of John’s Revelation Chapter 2 verses 8 to 11 near the end of page 37. I think you and he, the nominal false-Jew, serve the same master.

I would be fascinated to read your reply!

Vince Barwinski

https://vincebarwinski.com/library/