The Russian invasion of Ukraine – The double-edged Globalist engineered conundrum of deceit, deception, confusion and subversion.

See also my follow up blog article at

Andrei Illarionov article on the Biden-Putin duplicity in Ukraine taken down.

PDF of this huge article HERE.

26 POINT SUMMARY:

The Russian invasion of Ukraine – The double-edged Globalist engineered conundrum of deceit, deception, confusion and subversion.

1) I begin with questioning the Western mainstream media (MSM) narrative that the supposedly blundering Russian commander-in-chief Vladimir Putin is losing the war. Reference is made to the Ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu from his book Art of War. Use is made of the analysis by the pro-Russian Scott Ritter, a former US Marine veteran who fought in Desert Storm. See HERE and my BLOG article HERE. Rest assured that later on, I will be questioning some aspects of his analysis.

2) The notion of the ex-KGB thug Vladimir Putin as a now staunch anti-communist and devout Orthodox Christian is debunked. For one thing, at Sochi Russia in 2017, Putin to rousing applause, gave several speeches to gatherings at the World Youth Communist Convention. See HERE and my BLOG article HERE. (You can start a free trial account with Epoch TV.)

3) The Russian Orthodox Patriarch was a KGB spy – not just an informant. See HERE and my BLOG article HERE.

4) Corruption in Ukraine is no worse than Russia’s. See HERE and my BLOG article HERE. Russia is ranked on the corruption index at 29, which is slightly worse than Ukraine at 32. A higher index means lower corruption. For example, Denmark, Finland and New Zealand at the top have the highest index at 88, while South Sudan is the worst at 11. Australia ranks at 73 while Italy and Poland both rank at 56. The USA ranks at 67, but given recent events such as electoral fraud, that seems more than overly generous.

5) The role of Biden family corruption in Ukraine and Russia playing its part in precipitating this conflict. See HERE from 8 minutes and 33 seconds in. Also HERE and HERE and my BLOG article HERE.

6) The Justin Trudeau admiring WOKE Globalist that is the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the flip UNWOKE side of the Globalist coin that is Vladimir Putin. See HERE and HERE and my BLOG article HERE. Such is the duplicitous double play of flip-sides of the Globalist coin in this war – to ultimately precipitate the diabolical agenda of the Great Reset – “you will own nothing but you will be happy.” See HERE straight from the horse’s mouth of Ida Auken – a Young Global Leader and Member of the Global Future Council on Cities and Urbanization of the World Economic Forum.

7) However, the key Globalist trait they have in common is their mutual love of pseudo-vaccine mandates, regardless of their proven inefficacy and dangerous side effects. See my other BLOG articles HERE and HERE. For Zelensky, see HERE and for Putin see HERE. Also HERE, HERE, and HERE and my BLOG article HERE.

8) But perhaps most damning of all for Putin, is Russian funding of anti-fracking/anti-fossil fuel protests in the West to undermine Western countries energy independence. See HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE. In my BLOG article, search for text “But perhaps most damning of all”. See also my BLOG article HERE where Schwab in 2017 proclaims Putin as one of his very own.

9) Key Russian involvement in Cyber Polygon 2020 and 2021. The Globalist World Economic Forum (WEF) describes Cyber Polygon as international online training aimed at increasing global cyber resilience. See HERE and HERE and HERE and in my BLOG article HERE.

10) Admittedly, Klaus Schwab by mid-March 2022, just weeks into the invasion, had excluded Putin from the WEF agenda. See HERE and my BLOG article HERE. However, in the Russian-Ukrainian war narrative of dubious Western mainstream media, one requires its hero – Volodymyr Zelensky – and its villain – Vladimir Putin – again flip-slides of the Globalist coin.

11) The credibility, or lack thereof of this Western MSM narrative, is further affirmed by the Young Global Leaders graduate Justin Trudeau, who as Prime Minister of Canada, in disproportionate push- back against the peaceful trucker protests in February 2022, took the opportunity to exercise a wide spectrum of his neo-Marxist totalitarian traits such as the dubious invocation of the Emergencies Act embodying the arbitrary freezing of bank accounts funding or linked to the truckers and the sanctioning of their brutal police suppression. See HERE and HERE and in my BLOG article HERE.

12) Curiously however, unlike the US 2020 Summer radical-leftist riots, [see for example the three minute video HERE or HERE] there was not one whimper within Canada and internationally from leftists in regard to “DEFUND THE POLICE!” Moreover, the Canadian Public Broadcaster – CBC – Canadian Bolshevik Collective had to embarrassingly retract a story that the truckers were funded by Putin’s Russia. No no no CBC – Putin’s Russia funds your greenie climate change scam neo-Marxist front darlings!!! See again HERE and HERE and in my BLOG article HERE.

13) The U.S–Bermuda–Moscow triangle of money laundering for the benefit of the neo-Marxist U.S. environmental movements is documented. See for example HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE and HERE and in my BLOG article HERE and HERE.

14) I come back to Scott Ritter to question his overtly pro-Russian and most disturbingly, his pro-Chinese Communist Party – CCP stance. See HERE and my BLOG article HERE. I address for one thing, the pro-Russian argument of “Ukraine being a mistake of history” and the heinous human rights abuses perpetrated by the CCP – such as the Uyghur genocide and forced human organ harvesting of Falun Gong practitioners. See Page 150 of The China Tribunal Judgment released on March 1, 2020, chaired by Sir Geoffrey Nice QC. It can downloaded from The China Tribunal website HERE.

15) To further highlight Scott Ritter’s pessimism in regard to the West fighting the new Russia-China bloc, I make reference to the CCP’s intention to invade Taiwan and the parallel plight of Britain in fighting Nazi Germany before the official entry of America into World War II (WWII.) See Page 111 A Man Called Intrepid The Secret War 1939-1945 by William Stevenson and HERE and HERE and HERE and in my BLOG article HERE and HERE.

16) The February 2014 Euro Maidan massacre in Kiev is dealt with in-depth using the studies written by the Ukrainian-Canadian professor Ivan Katchanovski. It does not reflect well on Ukraine and the Western MSM. See page 4 Katchanovski, Ivan. (2021). The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: Revelations from Trials and Investigation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.4048494. This paper can de downloaded HERE. However, the existence of far-right entities in Russia and elsewhere is also discussed to debunk the notion of wiping Ukraine from existence due to the existence of radical-right entities in its borders. In short, debunking the Russian pretext for its “special operation” to “denazify” Ukraine. See HERE and HERE and in my BLOG article HERE and HERE and HERE.

17) Putin’s cynically opportunistic links however to the Russian far-right, are still not the full story of the true antithesis of his ostensible agenda to “denazify” Ukraine. Enter the curious ideological cult of Nazbol or Duginism, as espoused by Alexander Dugin – himself closely linked to the Russian elite including Vladimir Putin himself. His father was also high up in Soviet intelligence. Dugin has a raging hatred for the West and its traditional NON-WOKE values – and indeed for Ukraine itself, bordering on genocidal. The original Facebook post of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies had the original Russian text and English translation HERE of Dugin’s genocidal thoughts on Ukraine. However, it was removed in mid-June 2022, but I have the screenshot of it HERE. Dugin’s original post on Facebook HERE was also removed in mid-June 2022, but it is still available on the WayBack machine HERE and the screenshot of it HERE.  See also HERE. His book, the bible for the Russian elite and intelligence – ‘Основы геополитики (геополитическое будущее России) / Osnovy geopolitiki: Geopoliticheskoe budushchee Rossii’ – ‘The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia’ reads like Hitler’s Mein Kampf. See HERE and HERE and in my BLOG article HERE.

18) The dubious Russian claim that Ukraine did not demarcate its borders is debunked. A claim which seems to have its genesis from the article in the pro-Russian and Russian language Ukrainian newspaper “Ukrainian Choice” titled “Украина – не имеет официальных границ!” – “Ukraine has no official borders!” The article was dated 08.04.2014 which would be 8^th April, 2014 – the month following the Russian annexation of Crimea and not too long following the Euromaidan. See HERE and in my BLOG article HERE. For a video summary of Ukraine’s history before, during and after World War I, see HERE. It’s extremely complex and messy, but this video explains it clearly for those patient enough. At the end, the narrator explains how Putin and his supporters distort Ukrainian history for their own ends.

19) The story of the captured British mercenary Aiden Aslin is discussed from the perspective of articles written by the BBC and the Russian English language mouthpiece “Russia Today.” The experiment I undertook on the forum of the Russia Today article is also documented. See HERE and HERE and HERE and my BLOG article HERE.

20) I discuss in-depth, the foreign policy trainwreck that is the vapid, blithering and feckless Creepy Sleepy Joe Biden masquerading as a legitimately elected U.S. president. See HERE, HERE and HERE. In effect, the first FEPOTUS – Fraudulently Elected President of the United States projecting weakness globally which the cunning ex-KGB thug could not have failed to notice. See HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, and HERE and my BLOG article HERE.

21) The role of the Military Industrial Complex in this conflict is discussed to further highlight how we are being played by both sides of this Globalist engineered conflict. As a consequence, Ukraine is left in perpetual debt that grows exponentially – meaning Ukraine is forever owned and dependent upon Globalist cabal entities such as Goldman Sachs among many others. See HERE and my BLOG article HERE.

22) The notion of Putin as our saviour from the Globalists, himself a man who has visited the virulent Globalist ally Xi Jinping 38 times since 2013, is ludicrous to say the least. See HERE. They have also met in Moscow: HERE. Moreover, many in the Putin saviour camp, such as the Larouche think tank, even go as far as claiming Xi Jinping and his CCP are our allies against the Globalist cabal! See HERE. As such, their world view based on trusting the CCP and Putin, is light-years beyond delusional! See also my BLOG article HERE.

23) And from the pro-Putin saviour camp, much has been made of Putin’s objection to Ukraine on Russia’s doorstep becoming a member of NATO. What is curious however, that Putin’s former economic advisor Andrei Illarionov, from 2000-2005 in an interview with The Epoch Times senior editor Jan Jekielek, stated that in 2005, Vladimir Putin had no objection to Ukraine and other former Soviet states joining NATO. However, according to Illarionov, by 2007, for whatever reason, Putin had made a complete 180 degree turn on this issue. Begging the obvious one word question; “WHY?” This interview is discussed and quoted in depth. See HERE and my BLOG article HERE.

24) Near the end, I discuss Barack Obama’s curious exchange with then Russian president Dmitry Medvedev at the late March 2012 Seoul Nuclear Security Summit. See HERE from 24 minutes 30 seconds in and HERE and HERE and my BLOG article HERE.

25) And in spite of Putin’s indisputable despotism, in accordance with the Globalist-Duginist playbook, are we to blindly believe the pro-Globalist DEMRAT’s intentions for Ukraine are truly honourable? Or are they beholden to the Military Industrial Complex that demands Ukraine replace Afghanistan?

26) My concluding paragraph is as follows:

“However, if one looks at it all through the lens of Vladimir Putin and his Duginist agenda as the UNWOKE face of the Globalist coin – as opposed to the Trudeau idolising and secular Jew Zelensky’s face on the flip WOKE side, a complex clarity manifests itself as one emerges from the depths of murky waters of deceit and deception to the clarity of sunshine of the land of the lifting FoG. Indeed, Alexander Dugin’s agenda, as documented in his aforementioned literary work FoG – Foundations of Geopolitics – not meant for Western consumption, but rather as a Bible for Russian spooks and elites, can be a tool of revelation and clarity to help preserve the traditional values – not toxic WOKEISM – of our Western civilisation, that Putin and Dugin, as alluded to by Andrei Illarionov, are in reality, just like their pro-Globalist ally the Chinese Communist Party, sworn to destroy.”

——————————————–END OF SUMMARY——————————————–

On 21 February 2022, Russia recognised the Donetsk Peoples Republic and the Luhansk People’s Republic, two self-proclaimed statelets in Donbas in Ukraine’s east, controlled by pro-Russian separatists.ⁱ The following day, the Federation Council of Russia authorised the use of military force abroad, and Russian troops overtly entered both territories.ⁱⁱ The invasion began on the morning of 24 February,ⁱⁱⁱ when Putin announced a “special military operation” – a euphemism for invasion, to “demilitarise and denazify” Ukraine.^iv

Overwhelmingly in our dubious Western mainstream media (see my previous blog articles), including their changing narratives of what Russia claim are American sponsored Biolabs in Ukraine,^v the narrative has been that Putin gravely miscalculated by assuming that he would secure the capital Kiev within three days.^vi Moreover, given how the ruthless and cunning ex-KGB thug, as asserted by Western MSM, has blundered incessantly in his “special military operation” in the Ukraine, recalls for me the following quotes of the Ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu in his book Art of War:

“Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance.”

and

“A military operation involves deception. Even though you are competent, appear to be incompetent. Though effective, appear to be ineffective.”^vii

Scott Ritter, a former US Marine veteran who fought in Desert Storm, maintains that the first five weeks of this war have been a diversion – in particular the assault on the capital Kiev.^viii Putin’s real objective being Donetsk and Luhansk in the majority Russian speaking east of the Ukraine. Certainly Putin could have focussed on these regions at the outset, but with the diversionary assault on Kiev and elsewhere, much of Ukraine’s infrastructure and materiel that would have otherwise supported a Ukrainian defence of Donetsk and Luhansk, has been destroyed. Moreover, at no stage so far in this conflict, is Ukraine really taking the initiative. In short, Russia is dictating terms and playing our questionable Western MSM like a fiddle, in classic accordance with Sun Tzu.

On the other hand, on the academic portal Quora; an American social question-and-answer website based in Mountain View, in the WOKE Promised Land of mass exodus^ix that is the state of California,^x I read incessant predictions of doom for Russia and that in all likelihood, Putin can only continue the war until early June – time will only tell. Conversely, Scott Ritter maintains that while Ukraine may still have tanks, they may no longer be capable of supplying the oil to run them – a key objective of Putin’s opening diversion of his “special military operation.”^xi Moreover, Russia has been able to circumvent much of the impact of Western sanctions by linking its rouble to the gold standard, and curiously, these sanctions could boomerang on the US and lead to its dollar being dethroned as the world standard currency.^xii Indeed, could this be a Globalist/World Economic Forum (WEF) objective of this war?

Joshua Philipp, the host of The Epoch Times Channel “Crossroads,” while admitting Putin’s linking of the rouble to the gold standard could undo the global digital currency agenda of the Globalists, critically, Putin is saying this is only temporary – perhaps just long enough to unravel the US dollar, before implementing the Globalist digital currency.

And herein lies a key piece of the puzzle that is the damn conundrum of the Russia-Ukraine war. Many throughout conservative and freedom movements globally have come to perceive the ex-KGB thug but non-WOKE and seemingly devout Christian as their saviour from the hideous Globalist agenda embodying pseudo-vaccine mandates among so much more. Ukraine and its president Volodymyr Zelensky perceived as the head of the Globalist snake that Putin is decapitating.

This notion however of the ex-KGB thug Putin as a now staunch anti-communist and devout Orthodox Christian is highly questionable at best. Firstly, at Sochi Russia in 2017, Putin to rousing applause, gave several speeches to gatherings at the World Youth Communist Convention.^xiii Moreover, he has categorically stated his assertion that Christianity and Communism have many clear similarities,^xiv and the collapse of the Soviet Union as the greatest tragedy of the 20^th century.^xv Moreover, David Satter, a former Moscow correspondent, says the Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill was exposed by material from the Soviet archives as a KGB agent. “This means he was more than just an informer, of whom there were millions in the Soviet Union. He was an active officer of the organization,” wrote Satter.^xvi

Nevertheless, in spite of Russia having more than its fair share of corruption, such notions of Putin as the defender of traditional conservative Christian values are fuelled by chronic corruption that exists in the Ukraine, in spite of it being no worse than Russia’s,^xvii and in America as indicated by its election fraud being buried by its Deep State and obsequiously complaint MSM.^xviii And the then US vice-president Creepy Sleepy Joe Biden’s insistence on the Ukraine in 2015, sacking their prosecutor Viktor Shokin investigating the corrupt energy company Burisma, to which his son Hunter, bereft of any experience in energy (well perhaps experience in “crack” energy), being on its board.^xix To which Creepy Sleepy quipped; “Son of a bitch!”^xx

Fair to say, the Biden family corruption, including Joe’s brother James, as confirmed in emails from the Hunter Biden laptop hard drive, now confirmed as genuine 18 months later by our dubious Western MSM, has played its role in precipitating this conflict the world could have done without. Not to mention multi-million dollar bribes the Bidens received from Elena Baturina, the wife of a former mayor of Moscow – Yury Luzhkov, deceased since 2019,^xxi who had been an oligarch close to Putin.^xxii Hence, we now have a leader of the now not so “free” world hugely comprised, relying on Russia for a most dubious nuclear deal with the Islamic fundamentalist state that is Iran.^xxiii

Zelensky is portrayed as a fervent Globalist, and personally, I have to agree. He is a great admirer of the Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau^xxiv who left no doubt as to his Globalist allegiance with his draconian response to the peaceful Trucker protests^xxv just preceding Putin’s “special military operation.” Moreover, after leaving his career as a comedian and entertainer and becoming Ukraine’s president in April 2019, Zelensky hailed Trudeau as “one of those leaders who inspired” him “to join politics,” when he became Ukraine’s president in 2019.^xxvi

While Zelensky has shot to stardom from relative obscurity from the perspective of the West since the Russo-Ukrainian conflict became international news in late February 2022, his admiration for Trudeau comes as less of a surprise when looking into his background. Like Trudeau, Zelensky is an acolyte of Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF), the Globalist organisation behind the now-infamous “Great Reset” agenda, which tells the world that by the year 2030, “You’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy.”^xxvii Hence, the ubiquitous support for Zelensky by the Western elite, including support from “defund the police” and Black Lives Matter leftist mega-donor George Soros, Justin Trudeau, Creepy Sleepy Biden, and all sides of Western mainstream media.^xxviii

Mirroring his idol Justin Trudeau’s authoritarian tendencies as proven by Trudeau’s draconian measures against the truckers, Zelensky, has banned eleven opposition parties – including the pro-Russian “Opposition – Platform For Life” which holds 44 seats in the 450-member Ukrainian parliament in spite of it speaking out against the Russian invasion. (Their website seems to have now been taken down.)^xxix As well, Zelensky has banned private TV stations – merging them all into a single state-run TV channel.^xxx Moreover, Zelensky’s biography on the WEF website,^xxxi and photo ops of Ukrainian women, including female member of parliament Kira Rudik proclaiming their patriotic fervour for their Ukraine and the “New World Order.”^xxxii The former I wholeheartedly relate to. The latter makes me cringe!

On the flip side however, the folly of the perception of the ex-KGB thug being the UNWOKE anti-Globalist Christian saviour of Conservative and Freedom movements globally is this; Vladimir Putin is the UNWOKE face of the Globalist coin – as opposed to Zelensky’s face on the flip WOKE side.

Clearly, the autocratic Putin, essentially the unchallenged leader of Russia since the turn of the century, has no need to appease the insipid, asinine and vapid politics of the WOKE ideological game. On the other hand, the Trudeau-idolising Zelensky in courting the WOKE west, certainly does. Synonymous to which, is his commitment to a green deal for Ukraine.^xxxiii It being much in the vein of the economic wrecking ball that is the US Green New Deal, resplendent with its not so really renewable unreliables of wind and solar, motivated of course by the Globalist engineered scam that is climate change.^xxxiv On the other hand, aside from a token affirmation by Putin via video link to the October-November 2021 farcical gab-fest that was the Glasgow Climate Change Summit,^xxxv Putin unlike Creepy Sleepy Biden, keeps pumping oil and moreover, Russia is one of the world’s largest consumers and exporters of oil, coal and gas.^xxxvi

What these flip-side Globalists have in common however, is their vehement endorsement of pseudo-vaccine mandates.^xxxvii On November 3, 2021, over a thousand people blocked streets leading to the Ukrainian capital of Kiev during an anti-vaccination protest. The protest was held in response to COVID-19 vaccine certifications and new restrictions mandating that teachers, government officials and other workers have to get vaccinated before November 8. Otherwise, they would face the suspension of their salaries.^xxxviii

Newsweek reported that;

“Ukraine has recently recorded a record-high level of infections and deaths due to the virus. Despite this, hesitancy over the vaccine among the Ukrainian population is high. Only 17.1 percent of the Ukrainian population is fully vaccinated, AP reported.”^xxxix

By late January 2022, the daily number of deaths dropped significantly, but started to spike again just before the invasion on February 24. However, by then the number of fully vaccinated was still below 35 percent^xl – suggesting a negligible if any effect from the pseudo-vaccine in reducing the number of daily deaths from early November 2021 until mid-January 2022. Of course, nothing in the Newsweek article was mentioned about the tens of thousands of deaths and adverse reactions globally to these dangerous concoctions.^xli

Ukrainian Health Minister Viktor Lyashko said that “the anti-vaccination spirit quickly disappears in intensive care, and fake certificates do not work there. Calls not to get vaccinated are, in my opinion, a mockery of our doctors and families who have lost their relatives.”^xlii But as the evidence has borne out, neither have the vaccines. Moreover, has early treatment with cheap, re-purposed and safe drugs like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) been tried as has been the case with remarkable effect in India’s largest state of Utah Pradesh (200 million) and west coast African nations respectively.^xliii I suspect not, as Zelensky and Health Minister Lyashko in the true Globalist spirit, would be beholden to the scandal riddled Big Pharma such as Pfizer^xliv and Moderna; the latter of whom, Anthony Fauci’s NIAID (American National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases) have patents for.^xlv

Likewise in November 2021, Russia enacted draconian measures to counter its own virus surge of around 1200 deaths daily,^xlvi among a likewise suspicious population only one-third fully vaccinated.^xlvii Pivotal to which were the implementation of vaccine passports. However, by mid-April 2022, Russia is still only 50 percent fully vaccinated, and was only just below this figure around the time of the invasion on February 24, 2022, when like the Ukraine, Russia experienced another spike. The vaccine pushed by the regime has been the Sputnik 5 vaccine, manufactured by Russia’s Gamaleya National Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology and has been approved for use in 71 countries with a total population of 4 billion people.^xlviii

However, by mid-March 2022, one month into the invasion, while Russia has fallen behind other countries when it comes to the morally reprehensible act of injecting children with dangerous pseudo-vaccines,^xlix and even as COVID takes a backseat to the conflict in Ukraine, Russia’s public health authorities are marching forward with plans to needle youngsters. Alexander Gintsburg—the alleged mastermind behind Sputnik V—will soon begin testing the “kid-friendly” version of his clot-shot on children aged 6-11. Meanwhile, Russia’s health ministry is telling under-18s to get vaccinated to ward off “stealth omicron.”^l Sound familiar?

And, for all its problems in the West, including chronic under-reporting, Russia does not have a VAERS – Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.^li Moreover, “Enemies of the people”: this is the name of Russia Today’s brave investigation into Russian activists who have reservations about compulsory COVID vaccination.^lii

On December 12, 2021, there was a Doctors For Truth conference in Moscow. According to the reporter Edward Slavsquat, it discussed “what the heck is happening in this country.” There seemed to be broad agreement that the insane “public health” measures being imposed upon Russians were not so healthy and were in desperate need of a rethink.^liii

While mingling with fellow conference-goers during a coffee break, Edward and his cohorts asked a doctor about his opinion of the “Sputnik 5 vaccine.”

“It’s not a vaccine, it’s an experimental drug,” he corrected us. Having seen numerous post-”vaccination” complications, he said he didn’t think this experimental drug was particularly safe.

The Russian government has gone completely rogue—full-on Schwab, to be perfectly honest. But will the Russian people allow their country to be Reset?

Increasingly, it seems the answer could be Nyet.^liv

Oh dear Russian people, I dearly hope your answer to the Globalist engineered Great Reset of “you will own nothing but be happy” is нет – Nyet – NO!

And rest assured, Vladimir’s Globalist credentials do not end with Sputnik 5 pseudo-vaccine mandates, nor his Gamaleya centre in October 2021 commencing its co-operation with the scandal riddled Pfizer^lv on a Sputnik-Pfizer pseudo-vaccine cocktail.^lvi In late January 2021, Putin from Moscow gave a virtual address to the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos Switzerland. In it he affirmed his close ties with the WEF head Klaus Schwab and his wish for worldwide vaccination.^lvii

But perhaps most damning of all, is Russian funding of anti-fracking/anti-fossil fuel protests in the West to undermine Western countries energy independence. To begin with, there is the March 1, 2018 Russian Attempts to Influence U.S. Domestic Energy Markets by Exploiting Social Media Majority Staff Report by the United States House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Initially, this report was available on the website of the House Science government body at https://science.house.gov/404?sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/sst%20staff%20report%20-%20russian%20attempts%20to%20influence%20u.s.%20domestic%20energy%20markets%20by%20exploiting%20social%20media%2003.01.18.pdf, but when I recently attempted to download it there, it was removed. Whereupon I downloaded it from the Pennsylvania University Library website at https://catalog.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/26781582 before uploading it to my website at https://vincebarwinski.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Russian_Attempts_to_Influence_US_Domestic_Energy_Markets_by_Exploiting_Social_Media_808676.pdf.

Page 5 of this report documented the following:

“Russia provides roughly 75 percent of the natural gas imported by countries in Central and Eastern Europe while the countries in Southeast Europe “receive almost all of their natural gas from Russia.” “Russia’s Gazprom has acknowledged for the first time a threat to its dominant position in European gas market from an expected influx of liquefied natural gas (LNG) produced in the United States under [the Trump] administration.” Shortly after this acknowledgment, U.S. LNG made its way to Poland and Lithuania. In fact, Poland recently signed a five-year deal with the United States to import liquefied natural gas into the country in an attempt to decrease dependency on Russian energy supplies.”

Such independent actions by Poland and Lithuania, in looking toward the then non-Globalist Trump administered US for its energy needs, rather than the Globalist friendly Putin administered Russia, would most certainly have fomented raging angst among the WEF autocrats in Geneva, given that their agenda thrives on their target countries reliance upon regimes they deem in alignment to their agenda – such as Putin’s Russia at the time. Trump’s January 26, 2018 speech to the WEF at Davos demonstrates most pointedly, his commitment to America’s sovereign right to be the masters of its own destiny^lviii – rather than bureaucrats in Geneva with pretentious, draconian and inflated egos of self-importance.

Moreover, affirmation of Putin being an instrument of the Globalists is given by Klaus Schwab himself on October 2, 2017 at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government,^lix when he proclaimed that Angela Merkel and yes, Vladimir Putin were Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum, with the likes of Justin Trudeau being the younger generation he was more than proud of – given their penetration of government cabinets in their native countries.^lx

Moreover, In 2020 and again in 2021, where its honorary guests were Klaus Schwab and the Russian Prime Minister (not president Vladimir Putin) Mikhail Mishustin, the World Economic Forum (WEF)^lxi conducted livestreamed simulations named “Cyber Polygon 2020” and “Cyber Polygon 2021” which respectively predicted a coming global catastrophe caused by a worldwide “cyber pandemic.”^lxii It was conducted like a parallel to billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates’ “Event 201” in October 2019^lxiii which predicted the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) before it happened. Cyber Polygon 2020 predictively programmed a coming supply-chain cyberattack similar to the cyber attack on the Solar Winds platform that occurred in December 2020.^lxiv Given the above, it almost seems like these Globalist sociopaths view a cyber pandemic in the same light as a biological pandemic. Indeed, in 2021, the WEF “dedicated Cyber Polygon 2021 to secure ecosystem development.”^lxv

The 2020 Cyber Polygon technical exercise attracted 120 of the largest Russian and international organisations from 29 countries. These included banks, telecom companies, energy suppliers, healthcare institutions, universities as well as state and law enforcement agencies. The teams practised response actions at the moment of a targeted attack that aimed to steal confidential data and undermine the company reputation. The participants took the side of the Blue Team and worked on protecting their segments of the training infrastructure. The organisers from BI.ZONE represented the Red Team and simulated the attacks.^lxvi

In 2021, Cyber Polygon was described by the WEF as an international online training aimed at increasing global cyber resilience. The event’s partners and participants include global corporations, international organisations, and government agencies from around the world. In the course of the training, teams got to test their cyber resilience and share best practices and experiences with the global community. In 2021, Cyber Polygon gathered for the third time with the support of the World Economic Forum Centre for Cybersecurity and INTERPOL. The event incorporated an online conference, a technical cybersecurity exercise for corporate teams, and an expert track featuring world-leading cybersecurity experts.^lxvii In both 2020 and 2021, Russia’s participation in a wide array of aspects, was very prominent to say the least. And given past events like the CCP virus just subsequent to Event 201, are Cyber Polygons 2020 and 2021, a forewarning of a huge global Cyber Infrastructure attack to come?

Admittedly, Klaus Schwab by mid-March 2022, just weeks into the invasion, had excluded Putin from the WEF agenda.^lxviii However, in the Russian-Ukrainian war narrative of dubious Western mainstream media, one requires its hero – Volodymyr Zelensky – and its villain – Vladimir Putin – again flip-slides of the Globalist coin.

The credibility, or lack thereof of this Western MSM narrative, is further affirmed by the young global leaders graduate Justin Trudeau, who as Prime Minister of Canada, in disproportionate push- back against the peaceful trucker protests in February 2021, took the opportunity to exercise a wide spectrum of his neo-Marxist totalitarian traits such as the dubious invocation of the Emergencies Act embodying the arbitrary freezing of bank accounts funding or linked to the truckers and the sanctioning of their brutal police suppression.^lxix

Curiously however, unlike the US 2020 Summer radical-leftist riots, there was not one whimper within Canada and internationally from leftists in regard to “DEFUND THE POLICE!” Moreover, the Canadian Public Broadcaster – CBC – Canadian Bolshevik Collective had to embarrassingly retract a story that the truckers were funded by Putin’s Russia.^lxx No no no CBC – Putin’s Russia funds your greenie climate change scam neo-Marxist front darlings!!! Not the truckers!! How about that?! But ooohhh stupid me! I forget that as neo-Marxist-Globalist propagandists/political assassins, you are of course committed to propaganda – not the truth. Just ask Lara Logan!^lxxi Moreover, when Klaus Schwab’s favourite bellows “We are standing up for Ukraine,”^lxxii his inexorable hypocrisy deluges this message by tens of decibels.

In late February 2022, just days following Putin’s launch of his invasion of Ukraine, the English journalist Douglas Murray in an interview with Australian Sky News’ Rita Panahi stated that:

“German reliance on Russian energy has been a ‘massive factor’ in the escalation of the Russia-Ukraine crisis…

Russia had spent ‘tens and tens of millions of pounds’ in attempts to stop European countries from fracking gas…

A massive Russian funded disinformation campaign scared off politicians in the UK from even starting fracking…

There were intrusions like this, by the Russians, by Putin, for many years because he wanted Europeans to be reliant on his reserves of gas…”^lxxiii

Moreover, Douglas also dismissed the myth of Putin’s “interference” in the 2016 US election enabling Trump’s election.^lxxiv Russian funding however, of Western environmental groups to undermine Western energy independence, is most certainly not!

For example, the Californian environmental group Sea Change had the following written about its funding in the United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Minority Staff Report titled The Chain of Environmental Command: How a Club of Billionaires and Their Foundations Control the Environmental Movement and Obama’s EPA dated July 30, 2014:

“Sea Change’s IRS Form 990 also shows that in addition to funding by the Simons, the only other source of its contributions derives from a Bermuda-based company called Klein Ltd. It appears that Klein exists on paper only, as it does not have an Internet presence, and was set up for the sole purpose of funnelling anonymous donations to Sea Change. In 2010, Klein contributed $13 million to Sea Change, amounting to 49% of all contributions to Sea Change that year, and in 2011 Klein contributed $10 million to Sea Change, amounting to 33% of all contributions to Sea Change. Bermuda offer Klein government guaranteed anonymity for the sources of their donations. As a practical matter, an overseas company contributing tens of millions to organizations dedicated to abolishing the use of affordable fossil fuels is highly problematic. This is only compounded by the fact it is deliberately and completely lacking in transparency. However, it is likely this lack of transparency shields Klein Ltd from any responsibility to the American businesses and families it hurts.”^lxxv

As suspicious as this sounds, this US Senate document makes no mention of Russia. However, the EPA Report document compiled by the conservative Washington Free Beacon,^lxxvi in its executive summary on its opening page, clarified the limitations of the aforementioned July 2014 Senate report:

While this report sheds significant light on the who and the how, the truly outrageous nature of these complex arrangements are only understood by exploring the why. This report articulates several possible reasons for the convoluted and secretive structure of the far-left environmental movement; yet, at the end of the day, we are still asking – why? Why are members of the Billionaire’s Club going to such extreme lengths to hide their generous support of supposed charitable causes?^lxxvii

followed by:

In the below report, we believe we have taken an important step toward answering that question with new information and never-before-identified players and connections.

Our report begins where the Senate report ended, with Klein Ltd. Klein Ltd., a corporation that “only exists on paper” and is based out of a Bermuda law firm called Wakefield Quin, gave $23 million dollars to environmental bundler Sea Change Foundation from 2010 to 2011, which has given tens of millions to other U.S. environmental groups. While it is unclear who is funding Klein, the law firm controlling this shady offshore funder of the U.S. environmental movement has ties to Russian money laundering, a friend and advisor of Vladimir Putin, Russian oil production, and more.^lxxviii

On the second page, a schematic diagram of the U.S–Bermuda–Moscow triangle of money laundering for the benefit of the neo-Marxist U.S. environmental movements is given. One man at its centre from Wakefield Quin is N. (Nicholas) Hoskins. In the document given on page 26 of the Free Beacon report, Nicholas Hoskins^lxxix is listed as the director of Troika Dialog (Bermuda) Limited linked to Troika Audit LLC in Moscow. Which raises the “burning” question; Is Vladimir Putin funding U.S. environmental groups because he believes in the climate change scam? While the Ukrainian Globalist Volodymyr Zelensky clearly does – or at least plays the Globalist charade required of him, Putin’s objective in undermining Western energy independence, while showing no real indication of mitigating Russia’s use of fossil fuels, clearly does not!^lxxx Abundantly clear as well, is the myth among many conservatives and freedom movement supporters in the west, of Putin as their liberator from the Globalist agenda. Such is the duplicitous double play of flip-sides of the Globalist coin in this war^lxxxi – to ultimately precipitate the diabolical agenda of the Great Reset – “you will own nothing but you will be happy.”

Sounds far fetched? Well recently, World Bank President David Malpass told the BBC at the International Monetary Fund–World Bank spring meetings in Washington that record food prices could see hundreds of millions of people forced into poverty if the conflict in Ukraine continues.^lxxxii When hyper-inflation rules, money becomes worthless, as was the case in the early 1920s of Germany’s Weimar Republic, in the wake of the war reparations imposed upon a defeated Germany by the terms of the Versailles Treaty.^lxxxiii Moreover, Ukraine and Russia are the bread basket of Europe, and Russia is the world’s biggest exporter of fertilisers.^lxxxiv

Earlier, I had mentioned the analysis by the US military analyst Scott Ritter, which in many respects, presented thought provoking perspectives into the Russia-Ukraine war, that were a refreshing change from the blatantly agenda-driven reporting by Western MSM. This as evidenced in numerous episodes such as the fabricated 2016 Trump-Russia election collusion scandal; their refusal to acknowledge overwhelming evidence of fraud in the 2020 election;^lxxxv their dubious narrative of the so-called safe and effective pseudo-vaccines and mandates pushed by scandal riddled Big Pharma such as Pfizer;^lxxxvi and their suppression in October 2020 of the Hunter Biden laptop story with contrived narratives of Russian disinformation and hacks, that recently the likes of the Pravdas on the Hudson and the Potomac (New York Times and Washington Post) have for whatever reason, now acknowledged or at least implied as spurious.^lxxxvii

Scott Ritter maintained that the first five weeks of this war have been a diversion by the Russians – in particular the assault on the capital Kiev.^lxxxviii His case was quite compelling, but aspects of it started concerning me as the two hour plus discussion progressed. Firstly, that the Ukrainian military position, in spite of their bravery, is now lost – and that indeed maybe the case – however, he seemed to imply that he was fine with the elimination of the Ukrainian nation from existence. Which seems to affirm Putin’s assertion before the invasion that Ukraine was essentially a mistake of history.^lxxxix As such, my Polish roots remind me of when Stalin’s People’s Commissar for Foreign Affairs Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov had cynically dubbed Poland “the ugly brainchild of the Versailles Treaty.”^xc [The post-WWI-treaty.]

To which, with Scott alluding to NATO now being a mere shadow or toothless tiger of its Cold War self, due in great part to the complacency of NATO and the West in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, Poland would soon follow in the wake what he essentially termed “Poland’s likewise brave but pointless resistance.” Article five of the NATO founding treaty compelling NATO to come to the aid of any of its member states when attacked,^xci being the now essentially toothless tiger of the post-Cold War NATO.

Scott then affirmed the end of the American superpower world hegemony being usurped by a new world bloc (I think he was being careful to use the word “bloc” rather than “order”) led by Russia and China – a new world block that Scott, as it seemed to me, welcomed! America’s navy let alone any other, had no hope of matching China’s, and as such should not challenge it in the Taiwan Strait – nor in the South China Sea – which the CCP now claims as Chinese territory, not as international waters as stated by international law, and affirmed in July 2016, by the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague.^xcii Moreover, he proclaimed the CCP takeover of Taiwan as inevitable, in spite of what would be again “a brave pointless resistance.” However, the both politically and naturally treacherous Taiwan Strait, makes a CCP invasion of Taiwan only really feasible in April and October.^xciii Thus eliminating the factor of surprise. Moreover, it seems the biggest battle is in the mind:

But just as important is the lack of knowledge ordinary Taiwanese have about the strength of their islands’ defenses. A recent poll found that 65 percent of Taiwanese “have no confidence” in their military’s ability to hold off the PLA. Absent a vigorous campaign designed to educate the public about the true odds of successful military resistance, the Taiwanese people are likely to judge the security of their island on flawed metrics, like the diminishing number of countries that maintain formal relations with Taipei instead of Beijing. The PLA’s projected campaign is specifically designed to overwhelm and overawe a demoralized Taiwanese military. The most crucial battlefield may be the minds of the Taiwanese themselves. Defeatism is a more dangerous threat to Taiwanese democracy than any weapon in China’s armory.^xciv

And …

They [the CCP] know war would be a terrific gamble, even if they only admit it to each other. Yet this also makes sense of the party’s violent reactions to even the smallest of arms sales to Taiwan. Their passion betrays their angst. They understand what Western gloom-and-doomsters do not. American analysts use terms like “mature precision-strike regime” and “anti-access and area denial warfare” to describe technological trends that make it extremely difficult to project naval and airpower near enemy shores. Costs favor the defense: It is much cheaper to build a ship-killing missile than it is to build a ship.^xcv

In the two years prior to America’s official entry into World War II, American support for Britain’s war effort against the Third Reich was crucial, including not just the Lend-Lease to Britain from late 1940,^xcvi but even covert support such as crucial American assistance in the sinking of the prize German battleship Bismarck in late May 1941^xcvii – just over six months before the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor precipitated America’s official entry into the war.^xcviii

Two eminent American figures at the time were the famous transatlantic aviator Charles Lindbergh, who completed the first solo, non-stop transatlantic flight in history in May 1927 from New York, to Paris,^xcix and the U.S. Ambassador to Great Britain; Joseph Kennedy, the father of John F. and Bobby Kennedy, who landed the plum London diplomatic position in late 1937,^c arriving with his family of nine children on March 1, 1938.

He was born in Boston, Massachusetts, on September 6, 1888 and his grandparents had emigrated to the United States from Ireland in the 1840s to flee the Irish famine. The political and social mores in Boston at that time separated the Irish from the Protestant “blue bloods,” effectively keeping the Irish from participating in the worlds of business and politics.^ci This had only made the young Joseph more driven, but as well, the memory of his grandparents fleeing the Irish famine under oppressive British rule, hardly made him pre-disposed to British interests in early 1938 – and hence, sympathetic to its enemies, such as Nazi Germany at the time.

Hence, the notion of the German enemy of my ancestral oppressor is my friend, had much more than just a fleeting appeal to Joseph Kennedy. Almost immediately upon his arrival in Britain, he drifted closer to Neville Chamberlain and notorious appeasers and members of the British aristocracy with pro-Nazi views.^cii Following Prime Minister Chamberlain’s capitulation at the September 1938 Munich conference that dismembered Czechoslovakia,^ciii Kennedy had even claimed “credit” for saving the “peace” by influencing Chamberlain to trust Hitler.^civ

Misgivings about Kennedy could not sway Chamberlain who was impressed by reports of German invincibility. Kennedy even had Charles Lindbergh brought over to London with frightening stories of German overwhelming air power and superiority.^cv Lindbergh and his family in 1935, moved to Europe following the trial of the kidnapper and murderer of his son to escape the attention of the rapacious American media. They would not return until 1939.^cvi However, that was not before Hermann Göring, one of the Nazi elite and chief of the German Luftwaffe, presented Lindbergh in 1938 with a German medal of honour, prompting outcries back in the U.S. from critics of Nazism.^cvii

Then during the great air Battle of Britain in the second-half of 1940, when Britain was under relentless bombing from the Luftwaffe, Kennedy reported that Britain was done for. German air raids had employed only a fraction of the vast armadas that Charles Lindbergh had described to him in such graphic detail. When the real blitz got away, London, Kennedy maintained, would be razed.

Kennedy would endure a month of this most intense bombing, until he believed that his “effectiveness” as ambassador was coming to an end, when on October 6, 1940, he wrote a letter to Roosevelt asking that he be relieved of his duties in London and demanded that he be brought home. If his request was denied, he would come home anyway. The Roosevelt administration accepted Kennedy’s wishes, and he arrived in New York on October 27, arriving at La Guardia Airport.^cviii

And finally, to cap off the Kennedy-Lindbergh twin Nazi appeasement saga, there was in New York City in the summer of 1940, as reported by the British journalist and politician Tom Driberg; a rally held for the pro-Nazi and isolationist movement by the name of “America First”: [Nothing like America First under Trump! Trump for one thing, moved the U.S. embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Hardly something an anti-Semite would do!^cix]

“I went to a rally at which Charles Lindbergh spoke,in Madison Square Garden. It was as hysterical as any Hitler mob, but much more unpleasant. They sang America First, Last and Always, but could not sing God Bless America because it was written by a Jew. … Reading the full text of Lindbergh’s speech, I realised that – the war having been on for a year, France and much else of civilisation enslaved, London bombed, the march to the death camps underway – it contained no word of even mild disapproval of Hitler.”^cx

Like Taiwan of today, Britain’s lead up to and during its war against Nazi Germany, especially before America’s official entry into it, was clearly, in no small part, a war of the mind. For one thing, in spite of incessant assertions made by Nazi sympathisers like Charles Lindbergh and Joseph Kennedy, Britain still achieved victory over the German Luftwaffe in the epic 1940 Battle of Britain over a year before official U.S. entry into the war. Similarly today, Taiwan should not accept as inevitable, the despotic CCP takeover of its Democratic Island Nation. This in spite of the incessant assertions of the CCP, and it seems, its sympathiser; Scott Ritter, who as he welcomes a new world bloc – in effect a new world order led by Russia and the unarguably Globalist World Economic Forum aligned Chinese Communist Party,^cxi should consider the following.

In November 2017, Chinese President Xi Jinping introduced a programme to “Sinicise” all religious practice, insisting that it must be “Chinese in orientation.” The government must “provide active ‘guidance’ to religions so that they can ‘adapt’ themselves to socialist society,” he said.^cxii Beijing’s increasingly horrific pogrom against ethnic Muslim Uyghurs in the north-west province of Xinjiang, as much Central Asia as it is China, casts a huge human rights and religious persecution shadow over support in any way shape or form for this stinking regime. Surveillance techniques used in Xinjiang have already emerged elsewhere; the government has installed closed-circuit TV cameras in some Catholic and Protestant churches.

Muslim Uyghurs, since 2009, have been subjected to extreme repression that has seen the banning of many traditional Islamic practices, mass disappearances, thousands jailed, and hundreds sentenced to death in stadium trials. In the eighteen months preceding September 2018, the pogrom culminated in concentration camps that human rights agencies estimate hold up to a million Uyghurs.^cxiii As Drew Pavlou, the young University of Queensland (UQ)¹ philosophy student, suspended in mid-2020 for daring to lead protests against the CCP on campus, commented: “This is the largest internment of a people based on their ethnicity since the Holocaust.”^cxiv

According to Drew Pavlou’s pro bono Queen’s Counsel (QC), Tony Morris, UQ students who organise protests against the democratic state of Israel are always left unhindered on campus to exercise their democratic rights.^cxv Israel however, is not so critical to the financial bottom line for UQ.^cxvi According to the final report released on March 1, 2020 by the UK based China Tribunal, chaired by UK Queen’s Counsel (QC) Sir Geoffrey Nice: “Hospitals in the PRC have had access to a population of donors whose organs could be extracted according to demand for them.”^cxvii

Prime targets for this heinous practice, are members of the Falun Gong spiritual movement.^cxviii For the Uyghurs, the CCP are implementing programmes of forced sterilisation and abortion to curb China’s Muslim population, while at the same time, encouraging some of the country’s ethnic Han majority to have more children.^cxix Welcoming a new world CCP-Russia led bloc is like welcoming pseudo-vaccines endorsed by mass-murdering Globalist fascist sociopaths for profit like Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci. Just read Bobby Kennedy junior’s latest and meticulously researched book The Real Anthony Fauci.^cxx

As mentioned at the beginning of this essay, from the Russian side, much has been made of its “special operation” pretext to “denazify” Ukraine.^cxxi Perhaps the most prominent of these far-right Ukrainian entities is the Azov Battalion named after the sea off Ukraine’s south-east coast, but there are a number of others such as Svoboda and the Right Sector. For some perspective, it is useful to discuss briefly the Euromaidan of late 2013 to early 2014.(So named after Kiev’s central Maidan square)^cxxii In particular, when it all came to a head during the massacre of protesters and police during the “Euromaidan” mass protests on February 18-20, 2014 in Ukraine resulting in the overthrow of the semi-democratic, corrupt, and relatively pro-Russian Yanukovych government.^cxxiii This mass killing was a tipping point which ultimately led or contributed to a civil war in the eastern and majority Russian speaking region of Donbas, Russian military interventions in Crimea and Donbas, and the secession and annexation of Crimea by Russia and international conflicts between Ukraine and Russia and the West and Russia.^cxxiv It is these events, that of themselves, have been major factors in precipitating Russia’s full scale invasion of today.

The study titled The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: Revelations from Trials and Investigation by Ivan Katchanovski from the University of Ottawa’s School of Political Studies, Conflict Studies and Human Rights Program,^cxxv poses the key question; “What does evidence made public by the Maidan massacre trials and Ukrainian government investigations reveal about which of the parties of the conflict was involved in this mass killing?”

This paper analysed several hundred hours of video recordings of the Maidan massacre trials and information concerning investigations of this massacre in over 2,500 court decisions from the official court decisions database in Ukraine. It examined trial and investigation testimonies of wounded protesters, relatives of the killed protesters, prosecution and defence witnesses, and top officials of the Yanukovych government. The study also analyses results of forensic ballistic and medical examinations and investigative experiments, and videos and photos of the Maidan massacre made public during the trial. It included several online video appendixes and contain testimonies of wounded protesters and witnesses concerning snipers in Maidan-controlled locations and content analyses of synchronised segments of American, Belgian, Belarusian, British, Finish, French, Dutch, German, Polish, Russian, Spanish, and Ukrainian TV videos, recordings of live online broadcasts, and social media videos of this crucial massacre.^cxxvi

The Maidan massacre trials and investigations had revealed various evidence that four killed and several dozen wounded policemen and at least the absolute majority of 49 killed and 157 wounded Maidan protesters were massacred on February 20, 2014 by snipers in Maidan-controlled buildings and areas.^cxxvii When one states “Maidan controlled,” one means, far-right Ukrainian elements such as Azov and Svoboda, backed it seems, by the west.

Videos presented at the trial showed that times of shooting of the absolute majority of protesters did not coincide with times of shooting by the Berkut policemen, who were charged with their massacre. Forensic medical examinations determined that the overwhelming majority of the protesters were shot from steep directions from the sides or the back. Initial ballistic examinations did not match bullets extracted from the bodies of killed and wounded protesters to the Berkut Kalashnikovs. Forensic examinations of the bullet holes by the government experts for the Maidan massacre trial suggested that Berkut policemen were shooting in the Hotel Ukraina snipers above the Maidan protesters and in trees and poles. The analysis shows cover-up and stonewalling of the investigations and trials by the Maidan governments and the far right. The prosecution denied that there were any snipers in the Maidan-controlled buildings. Not a single person is convicted or under arrest for the massacre of the protesters and the police almost 8 years after one of the most documented mass killings in history.^cxxviii

In his conclusion, Ivan Katchanovski stated that the Maidan massacre trials and investigations have revealed various evidence that the police and at least the absolute majority of 49 killed and 157 wounded Maidan protesters on February 20, 2014 were massacred by snipers in Maidan-controlled buildings and areas. Such evidence includes testimonies of the absolute majority of wounded protesters, several dozen prosecution and dozens of defence witnesses. The Prosecutor General Office investigation determined that about half of Maidan protesters were wounded from other locations than the Berkut [elite] police positions on the ground.^cxxix

Videos presented at the trial confirmed that specific times of shooting of specific protesters in the absolute majority of cases did not coincide with times of shooting by the Berkut policemen and directions of their shooting. This visual evidence alone shows beyond any doubt that the Berkut policemen, who are charged with the massacre of the protesters, did not massacre at least the absolute majority of killed and wounded Maidan protesters on February 20. The videos made public during the trial, such as the Belgian VRT TV video, provided evidence that the Maidan protesters were lured and then massacred by snipers from the Maidan-controlled buildings, such as the Hotel Ukraina.^cxxx

And finally, Katchanovski in closing his conclusion…

Contrary to the dominant narratives, the mass “Euromaidan” protests failed to achieve a [legitimate] political transition. This massacre started an armed conflict in Ukraine that led to the Ukrainian [Yanukovych and relatively pro-Russian] government overthrow and escalated into the secession and annexation of Crimea by Russia, the civil war in Donbas, Russian military interventions in Crimea and Donbas, and major protracted conflicts between Ukraine and Russia and the West and Russia.

That was as described by Katchanovski in his paper’s November 29, 2021 update^cxxxi – just shy of three months preceding the launch of Putin’s “special operation” into the Ukraine on February 24, 2022.^cxxxii Moreover, again in a damning testament to our essentially dubious and duplicitous Western mainstream media, Katchanovski on pages 17 to 18 reported:

The Western mainstream media with some exceptions, primarily involving a testimony by Yanukovych, did not cover the Maidan massacre trials and investigations. Google news searchers produced no reports of major revelations from these trials and investigations or evidence of the massacre of the protesters by “snipers” from the Maidan-controlled buildings and the massacre of the police by the far-right organisations.^cxxxiii

The Western mainstream media, with a few notable exceptions, explicitly or implicitly attributed the Maidan massacre to the Berkut police or [then still Yanukovych] government “snipers,” dismissed the false flag massacre as a conspiracy theory, and generally repeated the Ukrainian government statements and prosecution charges at face value. There were a few major exceptions. A Reuters investigation in 2014 reported that the prosecution case against Berkut members was problematic because it relied primarily on videos and photos and misrepresented or ignored some key pieces of such evidence.^cxxxiv

An investigative report by a Monitor ARD TV program in Germany 2014 reported that the government investigation was manipulated and that concealed shooters who targeted the protesters were based in the Hotel Ukraina. An investigative report by the BBC in 2015 corroborated findings of Katchanovski (2015a) and earlier versions of this study concerning the covert presence of armed protesters at the Music Conservatory and their shooting of the police. It also reported a statement of a unidentified GPU [A special department of Prosecutor General Office of Ukraine] prosecutor that he examined a version that both police and the protesters were killed by the same shooters.^cxxxv

Italian, Israeli, and US TV documentaries, Macedonian TV, and Russian media showed in 2018-20 testimonies of eight former members of the Georgian military. They stated that they were members of the Maidan snipers groups, which included snipers from Georgia, the Baltic States, and Parasiuk-led group in the Hotel Ukraina and the Music Conservatory and that they were ordered by Maidan leaders and ex-Georgian leaders to massacre both the police and the protesters and assassinate then president Yanukovych and that they witnessed such massacre by the Maidan snipers or were involved themselves.^cxxxvi

However, while one could give Reuters a modicum of commendation for its October 2014 story, one now finds that the original story at http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/10/10/us-ukraine-killings-probe-special-report-idUSKCN0HZ0UH20141010 has now been removed. Fortunately, I could still retrieve the story from the WayBack machine at https://web.archive.org/web/20200909180202/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-killings-probe-special-report/special-report-flaws-found-in-ukraines-probe-of-maidan-massacre-idUSKCN0HZ0UH20141010. That was on September 9, 2020. Two days later on September 11, 2020, it was gone – https://web.archive.org/web/20200911073807/https://www.reuters.com/article/2014/10/10/us-ukraine-killings-probe-special-report-idUSKCN0HZ0UH20141010.

Moreover, in an earlier 2020 paper, Katchanovski wrote that documents that were hacked from the Open Society Institute of Globalist George Soros and subsequently made public, apparently by Russian intelligence, revealed that the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine at least partially agreed with a statement by George Soros that the Right Sector was a Russian FSB plot aimed at destabilising Ukraine. In a letter signed by many researchers, journalists and other commentators were asked to refrain from commenting on the far right in Ukraine during the Euromaidan. This petition was accompanied by a statement claiming that Dmytro Korchynsky, the leader of a far right Bratstvo organisation in Ukraine, was in fact a Russia-linked provocateur in a “supposedly far right attack” of the presidential administration on December 1, 2013.^cxxxvii

Conversely, Russian and Ukrainian regional separatist politicians and the media, former President Yanukovych and members of his government after the Euromaidan often labeled the Euromaidan as a “fascist coup” and the Maidan government as a “fascist junta” organised by the U.S. government. Sergey Lavrov, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, stated that the Russian government had evidence that the Right Sector coordinated “sniper” shootings” during the Maidan massacre and it was claimed that the U.S. government maintained contacts with the Right Sector during the Euromaidan and that U.S. representatives visited the Right Sector location from which this organisation coordinated the shootings.^cxxxviii Given Katchanovski’s latest and meticulously researched paper updated in late November 2021, just three months preceding the invasion, Lavrov’s accusations at the very least, cannot be blithely dismissed.

In an article dated October 10, 2014 on the website of the independent English language newspaper Moscow Times, (in contrast to the English language propaganda mouthpiece that is Russia Today – more on them later. Moscow Times I used earlier this essay in regard to Putin’s vaccine mandates.) it was reported that in April 2014, prosecutors arrested three suspects, members of an elite unit within the “Berkut” riot police. Senior among them was Dmytro Sadovnyk, 38, a decorated commander, who was accused of ordering his men to fire on the crowds on the morning of Feb. 20. The three stood accused of massacring 39 unarmed protesters.^cxxxix

On Sept. 19, the case took a turn when a judge released Sadovnyk into house arrest — and, two weeks later, he went missing. Maidan activists were outraged, convinced that a corrupt system had let a killer escape. The judge was placed under investigation. The prosecutor said in a statement: “D. Sadovnyk, suspected of committing an extremely grievous crime, aiming to avoid punishment, disappeared from his place of permanent residence.”^cxl

However, in a country where justice often isn’t blind, there’s another possibility: Sadovnyk was being framed, and saw flight as his best option. In court last month, he called the case against him “a political lynching.” In the days before he vanished, his wife and his lawyer say, Sadovnyk and his family received death threats.^cxli

An examination of Ukraine’s probes into the Maidan shootings — based on interviews with prosecutors, defence attorneys, protesters, police officers and legal experts — has uncovered serious flaws in the case against Sadovnyk and the other two Berkut officers. Among the evidence presented against Sadovnyk was a photograph. Prosecutors say it shows him near Kiev’s Maidan, also known as Independence Square, on Feb. 20, wearing a mask and holding a rifle with two hands, his fingers clearly visible.^cxlii

The problem however, is this; Sadovnyk doesn’t have two hands. His right hand, his wife said, was blown off by a grenade in a training accident six years ago [2008 – six years before 2014]. As prosecutors introduced the image at a hearing in April, said Yulia Sadovnyk, her husband removed a glove and displayed his stump to the courtroom. “He can’t really shoot,” said Serhiy Vilkov, Sadovnyk’s lawyer. “To blame him for the crime is a political game.”^cxliii

The probes into the killings have been hindered by missing evidence. Many guns allegedly used to shoot protesters have vanished; many of the bullets fired were taken home as souvenirs. Barricades, bullet-pierced trees and other items of forensic evidence were removed, lawyers say. A former Berkut commander said Berkut officers destroyed documentary evidence that potentially could identify fellow officers. They did so, he said, because they feared the Berkut’s headquarters would be attacked by a mob of revenge-seeking protesters after Yanukovych fled to Russia.^cxliv

The former president Yanukovych isn’t the only key figure missing. In an interview before Sadovnyk vanished, Ukraine’s general prosecutor, Vitaly Yarema, said investigators had identified 17 Berkut officers as alleged participants in the protester shootings, based on surveillance camera videos and mobile-phone location data. Of the 17, he said, 14 had fled to Russia or Crimea, including the Berkut’s top commander in Kiev. Sadovnyk and his two co-defendants were the only identified suspects who had remained behind.^cxlv

The account just given of the Maidan of 2013-14 is often used by Russian propaganda and their acolytes as one major reason justifying Putin’s euphemism of the “special operation”; which for all intents and purposes, is still an invasion. The Maidan supposedly being conclusive evidence that all Ukrainians are Nazis, and a natural consequence of Ukrainian Nationalist partisan groups who during World War II, had fought against both Soviet and German forces for the objective of Ukrainian independence, had also perpetrated massacres of Jews when in collaboration with the Germans.^cxlvi Ukraine had been absorbed into the Soviet Union at its inception in 1922, and by the 1930’s, had experienced the heinous horror of the Stalinist engineered Holodomor or famine.^cxlvii

However, on July 10, 1941 in the tiny Polish town of Jedwabne, a massacre of Jews was carried out by Poles, not by the newly occupying Nazis, as they displaced the Soviet occupiers of the previous twenty-two months as they launched Operation Barbarossa – Hitler’s invasion of the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941. (In September 1939, Poland was invaded first by Germany from the west on the 1^st, but then on the 17^th from the east by the Soviet Union. The partitioning in accordance with the late August 1939 Molotov-Ribbentrop was implemented – but then violated by Hitler on June 22, 1941.)^cxlviii During the twenty-two month Soviet occupation, many of the Jews sided with the hated Stalinist occupiers, motivating the massacre as the new German occupiers arrived.^cxlix

Likewise during the German occupation post-Operation Barbarossa, frequent massacres of Jews took place in pre-WWII independent Baltic states such as Latvia and Lithuania^cl – which were absorbed into the Soviet Union post-war. Hence, would this justify Putin launching “special operations” into Poland, Latvia and Lithuania to purge these countries of “Nazis?” Moreover, what about far-right groups today in Germany?^cli

The Latvian born Professor Edward Anders (originally Eduards Alpervičs), who now lives in the USA, lost his father and many of his Jewish relatives in war time Liepāja in 1941 and was almost shot himself. He makes what to him is an important distinction: “There was no anti-Semitism. But there were anti-Semites.” Latvia in the 1930’s was “about as anti-Semitic as Switzerland, France and the USA, and Canada; but less so than Germany and several Eastern European countries.”^clii

Anders warned of black and white thinking [which one can say encompasses Putin’s assertion of blanket Nazism in the Ukraine] and reminds us of the many shades of grey. At the extreme ends, some Latvians participated in the murdering initiated by the Germans, but some also saved Jews at the risk of their own lives. There are 103 Latvians on the list of “Righteous Gentiles.”^cliii Anders further iterated: “I think it is both wrong and problematic to call nations or groups of people anti-Semitic. Nations are composed of individuals, and all such generalisations are false. At most, one can make statistical statements.”^cliv

The phenomenon is difficult to evaluate and people present facile opinions about it. What does it mean that Sweden’s Jewish organisation reported being “concerned about the spread of anti-Semitism” in Sweden after the results of a new opinion poll were published in 2006? Moreover, what is to be said of Russia [in 2008], where violent neo-Nazis are active, as well as several publishing houses specialising in rabid anti-Semite literature, while at the same time Moscow criticises other European countries [such as Ukraine] of anti-Semitism? In 2008, observers were shocked to see how violent anti-Semitism and xenophobia had recently spread on Russian net forums.^clv

In the late 1990s, Russia was shaken by a wave of racist violence committed by neo-Nazi skinhead gangs. After Putin’s accession to the presidency in 2000, his regime exploited this development in two ways.^clvi

First, it used the neo-Nazi threat to justify the adoption of anti-extremism legislation, a long standing demand of some Russian liberals. But in so doing, this legislation was subverted to prosecute Russian democrats. Second, the Kremlin launched “managed nationalism”, an attempt to co-opt and mobilise radical nationalist militants, including neo-Nazis, as a counterweight to an emerging anti-Putin coalition of democrats and leftist radicals.

“Moving Together,” a pro-Putin youth organisation, made the first move by reaching out to OB88^clvii – United Brigades-88 (Ob’’edinennye Brigady -88, OB -88 – Объединённые бригады 88)^clviii a Moscow Nazi skinheads movement created in 1998 by representatives of various soccer fan groups and skinhead associations. Members of this radical-right entity organised a pogrom of the Yasenevo market on April 21, 2001, and a pogrom of the market in Tsaritsyno on October 30, 2001, which resulted in the killing of four people and the wounding of more than twenty. On June 9, 2002, OB-88 members took part in riots and pogroms on Manezhnaya Square, during which one person died and several dozen were injured.^clix

In 2008-09, the Kremlin was threatened by Russian opposition activist Alexei Navalny’s efforts to build an anti-Putin coalition of democrats and radical nationalists in Russia. In response, the Kremlin began to work with Russkii Obraz (“Russian Image”, or “RO” for short), a hardcore neo-Nazi group best known for its slick journal and its band, Hook from the Right.^clx With the assistance of Kremlin supervisors, RO attacked nationalists who were abandoning the skinhead subculture for Navalny’s anti-Putin coalition. In return, RO was granted privileged access to public space and the media.^clxi

The problem for the Kremlin was that RO’s leader, Ilya Goryachev, was a fervent supporter of the neo-Nazi underground, the skinheads who committed hundreds of racist murders in the second half of the 2000s.^clxii This came to a head with the arrest on murder charges of Nikita Tikhonov, an ex-skinhead and co-founder of RO, who was the leader of its militant wing BORN (“Fighting Organisation of Russian Nationalists”),^clxiii a terrorist group that committed a string of murders of public figures and antifa militants.^clxiv The victims included the renowned human rights lawyer Stanislav Markelov and journalist Anastasia Baburova. Tikhonov was convicted of their murders in 2011.

This adverse publicity subsequently ruined the careers of some of the Kremlin’s Nazi promoters, but veterans of RO flourished in the propaganda institutions of Putin’s increasingly autocratic regime. One of them is Anna Trigga, who worked for the Internet Research Agency, the trolling factory that allegedly interfered in the 2016 US presidential election^clxv and tried to undermine Australia by inciting hatred of Muslims.^clxvi Another is Andrei Gulyutin, editor of the website Ridus, an important platform of pro-Putin Russian nationalism.^clxvii Today, RO’s Dmitrii Steshin, a celebrated war correspondent for a mass circulation tabloid Komsomolskaya Pravda (Комсомольская правда)^clxviii disseminates lies blaming Ukrainian false-flag operations for atrocities committed by Russian forces.^clxix

Curiously with the onset of the 2013-14 Maidan events, and the ensuing war in Ukraine’s eastern and ethnic majority region of Donbas, the most militant Russian nationalists left for Ukraine to personally participate in the hostilities on the side of the Kiev government, mostly in Azov Battalion (now known as Azov Regiment).^clxx This is not accidental, since Azov has been the largest military unit created and led by the Ukrainian far-right, so participating in it seemed politically promising. Russian citizens’ Azov fighters included Sergey (Malyuta) Korotkikh, one of the leaders of the National Socialist Society (Natsional-sotsialisticheskoe NSO); Alexander Valov from Murmansk; Roman “Zukhel” Zheleznov of the Restrukt! Association; and neo-Nazi leader Mikhail Oreshnikov from Cheboksary.^clxxi

After the end of the active phase of the hostilities in Ukraine, almost all of them stayed in Ukraine. Some of them integrated into Ukrainian society, received Ukrainian citizenship, and now take part in a local political life. For example, the above-mentioned Sergey Korotkikh received his Ukrainian passport from President Petro Poroshenko.^clxxii Moreover, Russian nationalists based in Ukraine have formed their own organisations, the most famous of which is the Russian Centre (Russkij Tsentr). It was created in September 2015 by members of WotanJugend, an ultra-right online group, and by activists of the Kirov cell of the Movement against Illegal Immigration (Dvizhenie DPNI-Vyatka), now banned in Russia.^clxxiii

The Russian Center (Russkij Tsentr) positions itself specifically as pan-Slavist, calling for the unity of all Slavs, and seeking to reach beyond Russia and Ukraine. They cooperate with nationalists in other countries, primarily with Polish nationalists from Zadruga, a Polish neo-pagan organisation created in 2006 in Wrocław and People’s Free Poland – a radical Polish group that became infamous in 2015 after the destruction of a Ukrainian cultural centre in Warsaw. In September 2018, they conducted an event “to strengthen the Polish-Russian ties” in partnership with People’s Free Poland. They also participated in the nationalist “independence march” in Warsaw on November 11, 2018. The Russian Center from Ukraine marched along with the Black Bloc, chanting “White Revolution” slogans such as “Europe, Youth, Revolution” and “Honour and Glory to the Heroes”, as they burned the LGBT+ and EU flags.^clxxiv

While Putin for the most part, has seemingly expunged gradually over time such radical-right entities in Russia, he had no qualms in using them while they were useful for his cementing of near absolute power in Russia from his ascent to power in 2000 to the early 2010s. Moreover, to reiterate, veterans of RO flourished in the propaganda institutions of Putin’s increasingly autocratic regime. Moreover, the American Neo-Nazi Rinaldo Nazzaro runs the US militant group The Base from Russia and in 2019, he was listed as a guest at a Russian government security exhibition in Moscow, which “focused on the demonstration of the results of state policy and achievements”.^clxxv The crowning glory perhaps being when a video posted online in March 2019 showed Nazzaro in Russia wearing a t-shirt bearing an image of President Vladimir Putin along with the words “Russia, absolute power”.^clxxvi

Putin’s cynically opportunistic links however to the Russian far-right, are still not the full story of the true antithesis of his ostensible agenda to “denazify” Ukraine. Enter the curious ideological cult of Nazbol or Duginism, as espoused by Alexander Dugin – himself closely linked to the Russian elite including Vladimir Putin himself.

Duginism is difficult to summarise in brief, as it contains numerous elements that require historic or even esoteric background knowledge to fully understand. An ultra-succinct summary is that Duginism is to the right what “Cultural Marxism” is to the left, though this is an oversimplification and a very surface-level analysis.^clxxvii

Both Duginism and Cultural Marxism are forms of Communist subversion and/or infiltration that have been neatly refined to appear ostensibly less Communist, or even un-Communist, in order to appeal to non-Communists and subvert more effectively. Duginism, Cultural Marxism, and Communism itself are all part of a much wider political force; a colossal multi-century conspiracy to construct a singular world government, led by international finance. They have essentially already achieved this objective in a non-official capacity.^clxxviii Indicative of which being the aforementioned global pseudo-vaccine mandates and rampant electoral fraud in the U.S. November 2020 election.^clxxix

It’s worth noting that those who parrot Dugin’s rhetoric should not automatically be accused of being a “Duginist,” as it’s entirely possible to unwittingly absorb an ideology via osmosis, which is, in fact, the most common way that people absorb ideology. Consider the pretentious Western WOKEISTS of today. It’s most likely that none of them understand that their ideas on race and gender were created by a bunch of literal-CIA-and-KGB-agent Marxists who were funded by David Rockefeller and friends from the communist Frankfurt School, with its origins in Weimar Germany,^clxxx but transplanting itself to America following Hitler’s rise to power. To put it bluntly, most don’t understand where their idiotic beliefs originate and most are never informed of the true origin of their delusional worldview. In other words, what’s the point in subverting somebody if you tell them that you’re subverting them?^clxxxi

And essentially, this is the case of duping for so many conservatives and people in freedom movements throughout the west – especially obvious since Putin’s “special operation” launched in late February 2022. Their naive and wishful notion that Putin and his Russia are cutting off the head of the Globalist snake in Ukraine – implying Putin as their saviour of liberty and freedom. The ex-KGB thug being the only thing standing between themselves and the insidious encroachment of Globalist engineered Orwellian tyranny into their lives. Little do they know, or wish to know, their “ex-KGB hero” is one key agent of the Globalist scam.

Given the deceitful and Globalist-agenda driven Western mainstream media, peddling dangerous pseudo-vaccines on men, women and worst of all, our children, and the simplistic Western mainstream media narrative of an heroic but Trudeau idolising nominal Jew Volodymyr Zelensky^clxxxii standing with his heroic Ukraine against the evil Putin, it’s understandable that some will be more than amenable to any narrative simply because it contradicts the MSM line – especially given the portrayal of an ex-KGB thug now seemingly turned deeply devout Orthodox Christian.

Couple this with Putin’s damning but of course accurate commentary on the American cultural suicide embodied by the synonymous Western Cultural neo-Marxist contrivances of Critical Race/Gender Theory and WOKEISM – more than likely proclaimed by him as another cynical tool to implement the Duginist agenda – not out of any genuine concern for the survival of Western Civilisation.^clxxxiii To which it’s worth noting, apart from his Davos speech in January 2021, Putin does not seem all that disposed to highlighting to the west his unequivocal support for pseudo-vaccines and mandates, in particular Russia’s very own and no less dubious Sputnik 5 vaccine.^clxxxiv On the other hand, when the Russian former World Chess Champion and outspoken critic of Putin, Gary Kasparov slams the WOKE cultural suicide of the west, you can rest assured, Gary is genuine.^clxxxv

Such a strategy by Putin suggests his objective to appeal to conservative and freedom movements in the west – not of course to support them, but to divide and undermine them. Curiously, American radical Cultural neo-Marxist WOKE entities such as Black Lives Matter, Freedom Road Socialist Organisation and Antifa look more to Communist China as their inspiration.^clxxxvi Hence, given the alliance of Putin’s Russia and Xi Jinping’s China, with Putin having met Xi Jinping 38 times since 2013,^clxxxvii and Vostok-2018 – the largest military exercise in decades which Russia and China undertook in eastern Siberia in September 2018,^clxxxviii this alliance seems diabolically potent and virulent in dividing and subverting the entire political spectrum in the west.

Aleksandr Gelyevich Dugin, the man behind “Duginism,” is a Russian political strategist with ties to some of the most powerful people in Russia; various oligarchs, billionaires, Kremlinites, military men, and even Putin himself. This includes people such as Sergey Naryshkin (Director of the Foreign Intelligence Service), Igor Rodionov (Defence Minister), and Gennadiy Seleznyov (Chairman of the State Duma). Dugin’s father was a colonel-general of Russia’s Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU), which is essentially the Russian military’s own KGB; a foreign-intelligence agency. GRU was originally established in the USSR by Leon Trotsky’s deputy. (Trotsky being one of the key and original 1917 Bolsheviks.) Because Dugin’s father was an elite member of Soviet intelligence, Dugin was born into this murky world, as so the list of influential ex-KGB agents that Dugin has collaborated with is long.^clxxxix

Wikipedia will tell you that Dugin is a Fascist. He is 100%, unequivocally not a Fascist. Dugin was an early member of the Communist “National Bolshevik” (NazBol) party and assisted in the party’s organisation. That should be a huge red flag to any with even a basic understanding of the scourge that is Bolshevism from its rise to power in the Russian 1917 Revolution. The Russian NazBol party was founded by Eduard Limonov, who most likely worked as a homosexual male prostitute while in the US working as a Communist overseas agent. In 2001, Dugin founded his own “Eurasia Party.” Four years later he founded the Eurasian Youth Union, which is banned in Ukraine due to the party’s destruction of a Ukrainian exhibition documenting the Holodomor (the genocide of Ukrainians by the USSR, 1932 – 1933).^cxc

The basic idea of Eurasianism, which is an ideology/movement dating back to the early 1900s, is that Russia belongs to neither Europe nor Asia and, therefore, must expand to conquer both. The basic aim of Eurasianism is the creation of a single Eurasian superstate/empire; an expanded USSR. Eurasianism wasn’t necessarily synonymous with Bolshevism but there was a lot of crossover between the two. Not all Eurasianists were Bolsheviks but all Bolsheviks were Eurasianists, this includes Bolsheviks in Europe as well as those in Russia.^cxci The idea of a “United States of Europe” has long been endorsed by Globalists from Churchill^cxcii to Trotsky,^cxciii to present-day EU officials.^cxciv A European superstate is a necessary step on the path to a continent-wide Eurasian superstate.

The defining aspect of Dugin’s Neo-Eurasianism is that it is, at its core, is an ideology, built upon hatred of the “unipolarity” of the “Atlanticist” West, specifically the United States.^cxcv

“The new Eurasian empire will be constructed on the fundamental principle of the common enemy: the rejection of Atlanticism, strategic control of the USA”^cxcvi

A definite red-flag for any American patriots if ever there was one!

Here, it is opportune to mention the two most pivotal of Dugin’s numerous literary works. that are key to understanding Dugin’s political theories and strategies. Namely ‘Основы геополитики (геополитическое будущее России) / Osnovy geopolitiki: Geopoliticheskoe budushchee Rossii’ – ‘The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia’ (‘FoG,’ 1997) AND ‘The Fourth Political Theory’ (‘4PT,’ 2009).

The reason why I gave the Russian Cyrillic title to the former, is because it was designed for Russian consumption – not Western, and in particular, not American consumption. It is the Duginist “mask off” book. On the other hand, the latter is the Duginist “mask on” book designed specifically for Western and most of all, American subversion.

Foundations of Geopolitics (FoG) is by far Dugin’s most important work. Dugin himself describes it as an “indispensable guide for all those who make decisions in the most important spheres of Russian political life – for politicians, entrepreneurs, economists, bankers, diplomats, analysts, political scientists, and so on.” In FoG, Dugin outlines his ‘Neo-Eurasianist’ geopolitical strategy, which includes a multitude of instructions on how to subvert, manipulate, and conquer various countries in order to create a Eurasianist empire.

As Dugin said, the book is highly influential among Russian elites, including the military, who used it as a textbook in their Academy of the General Staff. It was co-drafted by Colonel-General Leonid Ivashov, head of the International Department of the Russian Ministry of Defence. After writing FoG, Dugin was hired as a guest lecturer by the military, to explain his geopolitical Neo-Eurasianist theory to Russian officers and the likes. Seleznyov, a former Russian State Duma speaker and a buddy of Dugin, urged that FoG should be incorporated into the Russian school curriculum.

To reiterate, the most important thing about FoG is that it is, essentially, straight-to-the-point and completely “mask-off,” which one can see when they read its contents.^cxcvii Fourth Political Theory (4PT), on the other hand, couldn’t be more different. It has been praised by various nationalists in the West, as it has been heavily marketed to Westerners by Arktos Media (which publishes and translates Dugin’s work for Western consumption) and other “New Right” or “Alt-Right” influencers. 4PT is not designed for Russian consumption, but to be read by haplessly duped Western nationalists.

Dugin’s aim with 4PT is to ideologically subvert nationalists in the West, making them more malleable and likely to assist him, either passively or actively, in achieving the political goals he laid out in Foundations of Geopolitics (FoG). 4PT is overflowing with psychobabble, verbose gobbledygook, and complete bastardisations of various historic right-wing thinkers — particularly notable is the manner in which Dugin mutated and completely inverted the Traditionalist School of thought. For an idea of the sort of nonsense included in the book, chapter 13, “Gender in the Fourth Political Theory,” is devoted to arguing in favour of a-sexual transgenderism – sound familiar?? Behind the shoddy and transparent mask of phony “Traditionalism,” nothing separates Dugin’s Fourth Political Theory from the extant ideology of the Globalist New World Order (NWO – often labeled as “Neo-Liberalism) that he claims to oppose.

In brief about these two seemingly ideologically contradictory but in reality, complementary books:

FoG = Mask Off = Duginism-For-Me (For Eurasianists) = Influential among elites of Russia.

4PT = Mask On = Duginism-For-Thee (For the enemies/subjects of Eurasianists) = Promoted in the West by the Alt-Right, New Right, and Identitarians (specifically European Identitarians).

Earlier, I mentioned the Duginist red-flag for American patriots and conservatives. Here is another with sirens blaring for Christians in general in that Dugin believes in causing as much chaos in foreign countries as possible, symbolised by his emblem, the satanic chaos star sigil. He takes a lot of influence from the occult, particularly Jewish mysticism and eschatology (hence the “end times” empire). As Dugin wrote in his book Foundations of Geopolitics (FoG), which to reiterate, was co-drafted by the head of Russian Ministry of Defence and used as a textbook by the Russian military Academy of the General Staff:

“[Russia should] introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilising internal political processes in the U.S.”^cxcviii

In regard to Dugin’s embrace of Satanic themes, see the screenshot of his Facebook page at https://imgur.com/dQneigH and for his fascination with the occult, the screenshot at https://imgur.com/N4dmpzV.

Moreover, FoG sets numerous “tasks” to be completed by Russia, Eurasianists, or Dugin’s Globalist friends around the world. Remember, this book was written in 1997. In particular, under “Tasks for Europe,” his agenda for Ukraine is as follows:

“Ukraine should be annexed by Russia because ‘Ukraine as a state has no geopolitical meaning, no particular cultural import or universal significance, no geographic uniqueness, no ethnic exclusiveness, its certain territorial ambitions represents an enormous danger for all of Eurasia and, without resolving the Ukrainian problem, it is in general senseless to speak about continental politics’. Ukraine should not be allowed to remain independent, unless it is cordon sanitaire, which would be inadmissible.”^cxcix

Moreover, in a Facebook post on August 25, 2014, Dugin posted the following:

“Украину надо очистить от идиотов. Геноцид кретинов напрашивается сам собой. Кретинов злобных, закрытых для голоса Логоса, смертельно опасных и… при всем этом неимоверно глупых. Я не верю, что это украинцы. Украинцы прекрасный славянский народ. Это какая-то появившаяся из канализационных люков раса ублюдков.”

Which translates to:

“Ukraine needs to be cleansed of idiots. A genocide of cretins begs consideration. Evil cretins, [whose minds are] closed to the voice of Logos, are deadly dangerous, and… with all of this, incredibly stupid. I don’t believe that these are Ukrainians. Ukrainians are a beautiful Slavic people. This is a kind of race of bastards, which appeared from sewer manholes.”^cc

This from a member of the Russian elite proclaiming Putin’s agenda to “denazify” Ukraine!

And …

Foundation of Geopolitics (FoG) TL;DR:

• Utilising racial minorities (but also racists) to cause disruption and chaos within “Atlanticist” territories.

• Isolation of the Anglosphere (or the “Atlanticists”) from the rest of their European brethren.

• The merging of various (mostly European) countries to create larger geopolitical blocs.

• The necessity of a Russo-Islamist alliance.

• Absorption of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe into Russia itself.

• The creation of a “Third Rome.”

• The creation of a “Multipolar” world.

• And to reiterate; Dugin really hates Ukraine for some reason. [Old Bolsheviks did too].^cci

Dugin’s obsessive hatred of Ukraine could be due to its capital Kiev being the birthplace of the first Russian state – Kyivan-Rus or Kievan Rus^ccii in the 9^th Century. Ukraine’s move toward the Western bloc in the name of having a democratic state has made the Russian establishment feel betrayed because Kiev’s national identity and history is much more linked to Russia than Turkic states in Central Asia and Baltic states in eastern Europe, such as Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia which were also part of the Soviet Union. Hence, in this light, and in light of what this essay has already discussed, Putin’s statement that the collapse of the Soviet Union was “the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century”^cciii is hardly surprising. Curiously, Rurik, the founding leader of the Kievan Rus dynasty, and one of the godfathers of the Russian state, did not have Slavic origins as he had Viking blood in his veins.^cciv

Be that as it may, clearly today, as given by their heroic resistance, the majority of Ukrainians do not identify as Russians. In the last millennia and two centuries, the Russian capital has since moved from Kiev to Vladimir to Moscow to Saint Petersburg, before returning to Moscow in 1918 in the wake of the Bolshevik October 1917 Revolution.^ccv Before the collapse of the Soviet Union, it is argued that Ukraine has hardly ever been independent, and is thus, just a mistake or minor curiosity of history. But that is just aggressor’s logic. If the people want their independence, as indicated by their willingness to fight for it, that is their right. Times have changed over the last millennia and two centuries.

Ukraine they say is a centre of corruption. But Russia calling out Ukraine for that is like the pot calling the kettle black. To reiterate, in spite of Ukraine having more than its fair share of corruption, it’s no worse than Russia’s.^ccvi And indeed, what about America as indicated by its election fraud being buried deep by its Deep State and obsequiously complaint MSM – as graphically illustrated in Dinesh D’Souza’s explosive documentary 2000 Mules released in early May 2022.^ccvii Not to again mention the then US vice-president Creepy Sleepy Joe Biden’s insistence on the Ukraine in 2015, sacking their prosecutor Viktor Shokin investigating the corrupt energy company Burisma, to which his son Hunter, bereft of any experience in energy (well perhaps experience in “crack” energy), being on its board.^ccviii To which Creepy Sleepy quipped; “Son of a bitch!”^ccix Moreover, multi-million dollar bribes the Bidens received from Elena Baturina, the wife of a former mayor of Moscow – Yury Luzhkov, deceased since 2019,^ccx who had been an oligarch close to Putin.^ccxi

The dubious claim has also been made that the Ukrainian borders pre-invasion were not even officially recognised. For example, the charismatic and ex-SAS officer Ricardo Bossi who heads the freedom movement party Australia One, dismissed Putin’s invasion as simply “Russia invading Russia.”^ccxii In effect implying that Ukraine does not even have a right to exist – parallel to Stalin and Hitler in 1939 believing likewise for Poland,^ccxiii and when Stalin’s People’s Commissar for Foreign Affairs Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov had cynically dubbed Poland “the ugly brainchild of the Versailles Treaty.”^ccxiv [The post-WWI-treaty.] When questioned if Putin is a Globalist, he just blithely dismissed it and insisted Putin was cutting off the head of the Globalist snake in Ukraine. Clearly he knows nothing about Alexander Dugin and his book FoG.

Of course, if Ukraine did not demarcate its boundaries with Russia, neither did Russia. I think Bossi bases this on the assertion circulating the Internet that the former UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon stated this – which in turn seems to have its genesis from this article in the pro-Russian and Russian language Ukrainian newspaper “Ukrainian Choice”^ccxv titled “Украина – не имеет официальных границ!” – “Ukraine has no official borders!” The article was dated 08.04.2014 which would be 8^th April, 2014 – the month following the Russian annexation of Crimea and not too long following the Euromaidan. It seems sometime between 19^th September and 19^th October 2017 that this article was taken down, but is still available on the Way Back Machine.^ccxvi

But even if this questionable assertion is true, it still comes down to what the people of the Ukraine in their hearts want. Demarcation or no demarcation, I think we can say they desire, nay demand their independence from Russia and to decide their future for themselves – which easily overrides Putin’s notion of Ukraine being a mistake of history^ccxvii and questionable notions of non-formalisation of its borders.^ccxviii

As already alluded to in this essay, in this war like any other, behind the battle lines is the propaganda arm of both sides. A perfect example of which in this war are the conflicting stories of the English mercenary Aiden Aslin; firstly from the BBC,^ccxix then just days later from the Russian English language mouthpiece Russia Today.^ccxx

According to the BBC story dated April 13, 2022, Aslin is from Newark in Nottinghamshire, a former care worker who previously fought with Kurdish armed units in Syria against Islamic State. He had been fighting in Ukraine since he moved there in 2018, and became a marine in the country’s military. He was due to marry his Ukrainian fiancée, but on April 13, 2022, just a couple of days before he was captured by the Russians in the Ukrainian Black Sea port city of Mariupol, he informed his parents he would have to surrender to Russian forces. His unit had recently been defending the besieged city, which had been heavily bombarded by Russian forces. His mother Ang Wood said her son told her he had no choice.

“He called me and said they have no weapons left to fight, I love my son, he is my hero – they put up one hell of a fight.” Ms Wood said her son “sounded OK” when she spoke to him, but called for the UK government to provide more support to Ukraine. “Boris [Johnson] needs to take [Vladimir] Putin down,” she added. Brennan Philips, a friend of Mr Aslin who also spoke to him by phone, said he sounded “strong and in good spirits”.

“He called me and said ‘we have no food, no supplies, no ammo, we’re completely surrounded, we have to surrender,’” he said. “Aiden was very well aware of what was going on, very calm. They can’t get out, they can’t fight back so they had no choice. I’m sure if they had a bullet left they would have shot it.”

To the Kurds, Aiden Aslin is a hero, although he and many others like him faced questioning by counter-terrorism police when they returned to the UK. Most cases were eventually dropped. But now what has happened to him in Ukraine is uncertain. When Aiden spoke to his family it appeared his unit were communicating with the Russians in what appeared to be preparation for a negotiated surrender. The key question now is what would happen if he were to be taken as a prisoner of war? His friends have appealed on social media for Aiden and his unit to be treated in accordance with the Geneva conventions.

On the other hand, the Russia Today story dated two days later on April 15, following Aiden’s foreseen capture in the BBC article by Russian forces, presents a vastly different picture of Aiden’s mindset. Its worth noting, that in spite of the Russia Today story being the later one following his capture, I read and found it before the BBC one. The former titled British captive who fought in Mariupol describes ‘reality’ and dated April 15, 2022, reported the following:

Aslin said that when he joined the Ukrainian military in 2018, he believed he was with the “good side.” He explained that the situation in Mariupol was “an eye-opener” for him, claiming he sought to convince his commanders to leave the city, but they chose to stay, not least because Kiev supposedly wanted them to stay.

“The situation in Mariupol is catastrophic. It could have been avoided should Ukraine have left but they chose to stay. Zelensky had a big role [in this decision]. He could have told them to leave but they stayed. I did not want this, I wanted to leave because we do not need war,” Aslin can be seen saying in the video.

What he saw in the city during the weeks of heavy fighting also influenced his views on the Ukrainian military. “It was like seeing reality for the first time,” Aslin said, adding that he witnessed a “lack of care for civilians” on the part of the Ukrainian military.

“They [the Ukrainian soldiers] looted supermarkets when civilians needed food to survive in the encircled city; they [the military] took food from the supermarkets. They would stop civilians [from] going out to get water. They would stop civilians from taking water from a supermarket that had been looted; water they had themselves taken.”

“They are criminals,” he added, referring to the Ukrainian soldiers, when asked about the Ukrainian military allegedly killing civilians in the city.

The man, who claims that previously he joined the Kurdish forces in Syria to fight Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS), says he wants nothing more than to go home to his family and does not want to join any foreign military again, because he is “done for, after Mariupol.”^ccxxi

However, in the photo of Aiden, a prominent lump on the centre of his forehead is visible, suggesting a blow from a rifle butt. On April 14^th, the U.S, edition of the Sun released the story titled PRISONER OF WAR First horror pics of Brit fighter Aiden Aslin captured by Russian troops with gashes & swollen eye amid torture fears.^ccxxii

At the end of this article published by the Sun;

Another picture of Aslin with the cut to his forehead clearly visible was shared by a Telegram account that posts propaganda supportive of the pro-Russian breakaway Donetsk People’s Republic.

In a gloating post, the account wrote: “And here is a real English boy from the Ukrainian Marine Brigade, whom I wrote about yesterday and who, like the rest, chose life and the opportunity to see the Queen again.”

I will leave it for the reader to decide, among these articles, where the truth lies. However, if the Russia Today story with no mention of course of torture is accurate, it then seems Aiden within the space of less than two days, had a most dramatic and sudden change of heart in regard to Ukraine and its army.

Out of curiosity, I opened up what Russia Today call a “Tolstoy” account in order to post comments in its articles, and ascertain how they would react to comments both favourable and unfavourable to their agenda. It was most revealing and fascinating:

Comments such as “Western MSM is so bereft of credibility” and this which I just posted; “This story is a real eye opener for me in regard to our lying and duplicitous Western mainstream media who only report on the ‘heroic Ukraine!’”, Russia Today dutifully allow. However, comments pertaining to Russian funding of Western environmental groups and Putin being one of the Globalists who accordingly embraces vaccine mandates, are seemingly accepted at first, but upon reloading the page, they disappear – but not of course, the posts rubbishing our duplicitous and agenda driven Western mainstream media. Moreover, just now and straight after my not so flattering post of our Western MSM, I attempted to post the following:

A most informative book to read in regard to the geopolitical objectives of Putin’s Russia is the 1997 book “Foundations of Geopolitics (FoG)” by the Kremlin insider Alexander Dugin.

It was written for a Russian audience but English translations are available. It has had significant influence within the Russian military, police, and foreign policy elites. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35887243-foundations-of-geopolitics. This book is good – not because Dugin’s ideas are (quite to the contrary) – but because it gives a very clear insight into his beliefs, and the beliefs of contemporary Russian strategists.

And for an insight into Dugin’s genocidal perceptions of Ukraine, see the WayBack Machine preserved copy of Alexander Dugin’s now censored Facebook post from August 2014 HERE. Then plug the Russian text into Google Translate.

This Facebook post was taken down in mid-June 2022 but a screenshot is HERE. Moreover, a screenshot of the Facebook post from the Canadian Ukrainian Institute, likewise taken down in mid-June 2022 and alluding to Dugin’s August 2014 Facebook post, WITH TRANSLATION is HERE. They clearly illustrate Dugin’s obsessive hatred of Ukraine – which I quoted earlier. And naturally, after posting this on Russia Today and then reloading the page, it disappears into cyber-oblivion. Hence, the pattern of posts accepted and rejected by Putin’s English language mouthpiece that is Russia Today is more than obvious!

I have already mentioned on multiple occasions the corruption of the Bidens and how our duplicitous Western mainstream media incessantly cover for them – embodied in Dr. Robert Malone’s meme of the Western press dutifully shovelling up the manure into their wheelie bin on the heels of the Biden DEMRAT ass!^ccxxiii No doubt, this is a fact that the cunning ex-KGB thug could not have failed to notice. Namely that of a severely compromised, if not the most compromised, vapid and blithering American president in history upon which propagates ubiquitously his feckless weakness.

No doubt, after twenty years of engineering more than questionable Russian elections,^ccxxiv the ex-KGB thug is more than highly qualified to recognise a fraudulently elected and compromised president. While I would not declare complete certainty on the authenticity of a screenshot of a transcript of a telephone conservation between Biden and Putin in the wake of the invasion, where Putin allegedly declared Biden as the “sitting president of nothing,”^ccxxv I’m compelled to regard it as more than plausible.

For one thing, the news in mid-April 2022 about the Saudis considering switching oil sales to the Chinese yuan after the feckless Biden found himself snubbed by Saudi Arabia, which refused to take his phone call to discuss the current energy crisis, the spiralling prices of oil, and apparently what was to be a request for the kingdom to pump more oil so that the US, which has plenty, would not have to. (Note the Globalist compliant invocation of the Climate Change Scam pretext to undermine American energy independence.) “There was some expectation of a phone call, but it didn’t happen,” a US official said about a planned conversation between Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Biden. “It was part of turning on the spigot [of Saudi oil].”^ccxxvi Moreover, it seems the West itself is secretly buying Russian oil. Russian tankers, in violation of international law, have begun disappearing from radar, clearly suggesting that these tankers are carrying oil to European ports.^ccxxvii

Which begs the question: Has Saudi royalty ever snubbed a U.S. president before? While at the same time, speaks by phone with a Russian president?!^ccxxviii I think not! That alienation has mainly come, according to reports, because of Saudi “security concerns” presumably, for America’s enabling Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. In short, Biden’s ever widening embrace of the radical Islamic state of Iran and his increasing and corresponding alienation of traditional Arab allies in the Middle East.^ccxxix

As such, Creepy Sleepy Biden is a foreign policy trainwreck as he dismembers everything Trump achieved in the Middle East – or more than likely, given his ribald incognisance, is simply complying with the covert malevolent intent of America’s destruction behind the scenes by BCC – Barack Closet ComObama.^ccxxx Himself, in accordance with the agenda of his Globalist overlords such as Klaus Schwab and co of the WEF – World Economic Forum. Couple all this with the Afghanistan debacle, there is no doubt that American credibility and prestige internationally is in tatters, and will worsen as this fraudulently elected regime^ccxxxi remains in power. Perhaps the crowning glory of global American humiliation, is the Saudi comedic skit of the feckless and blithering Creepy Sleepy and his laughing hyena deputy as shown on the YouTube channel of Indian Gravitas WION.^ccxxxii

My idea of us being played by both sides in this war, suggests the Globalist agenda of prolonging this war. Arm Ukraine yes, but only to the point of maintaining the stalemate to the benefit of global arms manufacturers. Much like ineffective and dangerous pseudo-vaccines have become a seemingly bottomless gold mine of profits for Big Pharma.

A most informative and succinct video in this regard is the YouTube video by Clayton and his wife Natali published in late April 2022.^ccxxxiii At 5 p.m. every business day, the U.S. Department of Defense on its website at https://www.defense.gov/News/Contracts/ releases its list of latest awarded contracts amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars. In 2020, the total value of all contracts awarded to one company; Lockheed Martin amounted to $75 billion (yes billion). To get some perspective, the budget of the State Department was $44 billion.^ccxxxiv At the same time, there is no accounting of where these weapons go when they leave the U.S.

The CEO of Raytheon, one of these contractors states that weapons for the Ukraine come out of Department of Defense and NATO Allied stockpiles which will have to be replenished over time – namely, by the American taxpayer – but will of course be great of great benefit to Raytheon and other contractors making up the Military Industrial Complex as they defend “democracy” with tax payer dollars that make up 90% of their profits.^ccxxxv Just like tax payer dollars globally have been a financial boon for Big Pharma. Moreover, which democracy is the CEO of Raytheon talking about? Is it the “democracy” of the “Democratic” People’s Republic of Korea or the former German “Democratic” Republic or the Lao People’s “Democratic” Republic? It can’t possibly be the Constitutional Republic of the American Founding Fathers, who deemed democracy as the rule of the majority of the mob.^ccxxxvi Given the overtly Globalist feel of the Military Industrial Complex which Raytheon is part, I feel it is the latter. Certainly, that would be the intended mission of the Department of Homeland Security’s proposed Ministry of mis-dis-mal-information.^ccxxxvii

Of course in war, big banks demand their cut. For example Goldman Sachs is profiting on war in Ukraine by selling Russian debt to U.S. hedge funds.^ccxxxviii When these Russian bonds are sold, they not only make money for Goldman Sachs – but lend money to Putin’s war machine to ultimately ensure the perpetual cycle of profiteering in death for the Military Industrial Complex.

U.S. banks such as Goldman Sachs are prohibited from trading Russian debt with sanctioned Russian banks – but NOT banned from secondary trading as described in the preceding paragraph. This loophole is intentionally allowed by the Creepy Sleepy junta on the basis that U.S. entities holding this debt should be able to get rid of it. Goldman Sachs and other U.S. financial entities are pitching these trades for financial opportunists looking to buy something cheap in a crisis. In the process, entities such as Goldman Sachs make money, which in turn ensures the ongoing existence of the leviathan of profiteering that is the Military Industrial Complex – thanks ultimately to the seemingly bottomless pit of hapless tax payer’s dollars.

In other words, Creepy Sleepy and his junta are happy, and so is Vladimir – and I imagine the aforementioned Elena Baturina, who paid the odd million dollar bribe or two to Creepy Sleepy and his family,^ccxxxix has not missed out on her cut! Herself the wife of a former mayor of Moscow – Yury Luzhkov, deceased since 2019,^ccxl who had been an oligarch close to Putin.^ccxli

And what about Ukraine? They are left in perpetual debt that grows exponentially – meaning Ukraine is forever owned and dependent upon these Globalist cabal entities.^ccxlii For some perspective, it took the much larger and one of the world’s largest economies of Great Britain, seventy years to pay back its World War II debt to the U.S,^ccxliii and indeed, the core malevolent objective of Globalism, is to make us, the ordinary people feel dependent upon them for the so-called greater common good. In short, they despise self-reliance. Hence, a self-reliant Ukraine is certainly not in there interest – in spite of how much they themselves and our corrupt Western media boisterously but ostensibly proclaim; “We stand with Ukraine!” Of course, if they truly stood with Ukraine, they would cancel the debt as has indeed been fleetingly suggested in some quarters, but never taken seriously.^ccxliv

It seems, as I maintained from the near beginning of this essay, we are being played by both sides, working ultimately in the service of the Globalist/WEF agenda of its Great Reset. The notion of Putin as our saviour from the Globalists, himself a man who has visited the virulent Globalist ally Xi Jinping 38 times since 2013, is ludicrous to say the least. Moreover, many in the Putin saviour camp, such as the Larouche think tank, even go as far as claiming Xi Jinping and his CCP are our allies against the Globalist cabal!^ccxlv This latter notion is of course, as already discussed, light-years beyond delusional!

And from the pro-Putin saviour camp, much has been made of Putin’s objection to Ukraine on Russia’s doorstep becoming a member of NATO. What is curious however, that Putin’s former economic advisor Andrei Illarionov, from 2000-2005 in an interview with The Epoch Times senior editor Jan Jekielek, stated that in 2005, Vladimir Putin had no objection to Ukraine and other former Soviet states joining NATO. However, according to Illarionov, by 2007, for whatever reason, Putin had made a complete 180 degree turn on this issue.^ccxlvi Begging the obvious one word question; “WHY?”

Jan Jekielek’s interview of Andrei Illarionov on May 5, 2022, a former member of Putin’s inner circle for almost six years is compelling and most revealing and he elaborated why former Soviet states and satellite countries like Poland desired to join NATO:

Dr. Illarionov: Spheres of influence is an old concept. They have a so-called modernized name for that, it’s called spheres of privileged interests that never existed before. I had spent, as you mentioned, almost six years in the administration. That term was never used before, neither publicly nor internally. After that, Mr. Putin prepared these two draft treaties with the United States and with NATO with a request to return NATO to its 1997 division line, mentioning countries that should not be NATO members; Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and Bulgaria.

They have repeated this list of countries in this ultimatum on December 2021, from the conversation in Geneva, Brussels, and Vienna, on January, year 2022, in the statement of deputy ministers of foreign affairs of Russia Grushko and Ryabkov, on February 2022, in the written response of Russian minister of foreign affairs to the United States, on February 17th, exactly one week before the attack on Ukraine, and on March 8th and March 9th, in an official statement from the Russian minister of foreign affairs, already two weeks after the attack on Ukraine. It was the same approach, there should be the division line of 1997 in Europe, and de-NATO-ization of those Baltic countries, Poland, Romania and Bulgaria. That is exactly the goal that has been proclaimed in all those documents.

Mr. Jekielek: Americans might not fully grasp why these countries that you just named want so badly to be part of NATO.

Dr. Illarionov: Those people who live in those countries understand very well, because for decades they were living under the threat of attack, invasion and occupation from the former Soviet Union, and now from Putin’s Russia. That is why they see membership in NATO as the only chance to deter this attack and invasion. We see that for the whole period of NATO’s existence, there was not a single case of an attack by the Soviet Union under Brezhnev or even under Stalin on any NATO country. During Putin’s time, there was not a single case of an attack on any NATO member. But those countries that are not in NATO have been regularly attacked by the Soviet Union and by Putin’s Russia—whether it was Czechoslovakia, whether it was Hungary, whether it was the threat to Poland, whether it was invasion into Afghanistan, whether it was invasion into Georgia, whether it was invasion in Crimea or Donbass, whether it was invasion in Ukraine, whether it was a presence of Russian troops in Moldova, or an attack in Syria. [This flies in the face of Scott Ritter’s analysis. See endnotes #85 to #93.]

There’s a very clear-cut distinction. If any country is within NATO, it’s a guarantee for security and peace. If this country is outside of NATO, there’s a very high probability it could be attacked by Putin’s Russia.^ccxlvii

Dr. Illarionov’s assessments of Trump and Creepy Sleepy are virtually a mirror image of my own. Trump he said, “projects peace through strength,” while conversely implying that Creepy projects “war through weakness.” Hence, like me, he has no doubt that Putin would never have invaded Ukraine under Trump, but having sensed the abject and ubiquitous weakness projected by Creepy and his junta, Putin, like a shark, smelt blood in the water. It was not just one thing, but a combination of several events which transmitted America’s abject weakness under the Biden junta that is most capable when bullying American patriots, but abjectly weak when dealing with global bullies like the CCP and Putin. The following transcript excerpt illustrates this fact most pointedly:

“It was December of last year [2021] when Secretary of State Blinken was meeting with the minister of foreign affairs of Russia, Lavrov, and many people outside were thinking and saying that the main topic would be Ukraine and the concentration of Russian troops on the Ukrainian border. But when that meeting happened, we found that 90 per cent of the time was spent on discussing the [dubious] Iran [nuclear] deal. Mr. Blinken was trying to convince Mr. Lavrov and Mr. Putin to participate in the negotiations with Iran, to give Iran a chance to enrich uranium. That is why our understanding of what’s really going on behind closed doors is pretty limited. That is why we see this particular mindset of the leading members of the current U.S. administration—while at the same time giving a green light to Mr. Putin to attack Ukraine, they also continue efforts to provide Iran with a deal to possibly get nuclear weapons, which is threatening to Israel.

In April of last year, with Mr. Biden’s withdrawal of 100 million U.S. dollars of military aid to Ukraine that was actually scheduled according to the law adopted by the U.S. Congress, he actually gave those hundred million U.S. dollars to Palestinian authorities who gave this money to those terrorists who attacked Israel. Only after that did they stop this operation, but it was an initial reaction. For example, they removed Houthi from the list of terrorist organizations, and Houthi used this opportunity to attack Saudi Arabian airports and facilities. [No wonder the Saudi prince wants nothing to do with him and the Saudi media mock him.] We know that the U.S. administration withdrew American troops from Afghanistan in a blunder that we were all watching. So it’s not one single element. This is a very comprehensive mindset towards different countries, Houthi, Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Ukraine, and Russia. It’s the same approach.”^ccxlviii

Illarionov also raised the time back in August 2008, during the Beijing summer Olympics, when Putin invaded South Ossetia in the east of the former Soviet republic of Georgia, and Abkhazia, on Georgia’s northwestern coast.^ccxlix It became apparent to the then George Bush junior administration, that Putin was planning to invade Georgia proper. To which the Bush administration, in the sunny and balmy summer’s month of August 2008, moved ships into the Black Sea and pilots to Turkey and Romania. Within twelve hours, Putin subsequently cancelled his invasion of Georgia.^ccl In an otherwise train wreck of a presidency, this was the finest hour for the George Bush junior presidency.

Moreover, while Belarus allowed Russian forces to move through it to invade Ukraine, up until the writing of this essay at least, they never actively participated in this war, in spite of this being Putin’s wish. Dr. Andei Illarionov explained why as follows:

“There are so many signs that can be read in different ways. By the way, do you know why the Belarusian dictator, Lukashenko, did not attack Ukraine? There was a lot of discussion, ‘Okay, he’s going to participate.’ Mr. Putin was pushing Lukashenko to do it. Lukashenko even moved some troops to the Ukrainian border. There were many signs that they could cross the border within a day or several hours. And it did not happen. Do you know why? I know because I’m following these events. Those American troops, the Fifth Corps that I mentioned before, moved to the Polish-Belarusian border near Grodno, just for tourist work along Polish-Belarusian border. They spent some time there. Mr. Lukashenko understood this signal very well and he abandoned his plans to attack Ukraine. Nothing happened. Nobody crossed the border. Nobody participated in any battle. No life was lost. It forced Mr. Lukashenko to recalculate his strategy.”^ccli

And in this vein of strategic “bluff poker” to perhaps end this war:

Mr. Jekielek: But to be fair, it’s not just sanctions. [Which Dr. Illarionov had just stated have always, without exception, proven to be useless and ineffective – like dangerous pseudo-vaccines.] There is increased weaponry being passed to Ukraine from many countries. It’s not just sanctions, right?

Dr. Illarionov: It is not enough. That’s very important, because we remember how many times Ukrainian presidents and Ukrainian leaders were asking for jets, for MiG-29s that were ready to be provided by Poland, Slovakia, Bulgaria. Then for two weeks there was a discussion, “Okay, we can do it.” Then Mr. Blinken was saying, “We’re giving the green light to these MiG-29s.” Just to confirm, it was Biden’s administration that banned the transfer of these jets to Ukraine. So that is why it’s kind of a double game. On one hand, yes, they are ready to provide some defensive weapons like Stingers or Javelins, and that’s good, no doubt. That’s really good and that helps Ukraine, but the only thing that can stop Putin is the military defeat of his troops in Ukraine.

Mr. Putin’s statements and his minister of foreign affairs’ statements are very clear, they’re not going to stay there. But if they are lucky or victorious in Ukraine, they will go further. If somebody really wants to stop the war, just stop the war. It’s very simple. In 2008, [as just discussed] as we know, the decision of George Bush Jr. to send the U.S. Navy to the Black Sea and keep the U.S. Air Force in Turkey stopped a Russian invasion within 12 hours.

The U.S. administration could do something similar today. For example, give the order to the Fifth American Corps located in Poland to move to the territory of Ukraine, not to participate in the war, not to fight on the front, but to visit coffee houses in Lviv, just to taste the coffee in the famous Lviv coffee houses. With the announcement that American troops are deploying in Ukraine, in the west of Ukraine, not doing military business, but as a peacekeeping operation or just a tourist trip into the west of Ukraine—Mr. Putin would ask for negotiations within 24 hours. He would immediately pick up the phone and call Mr. Biden and say, “Okay, what kind of arrangements would we like to have?” Very simple. There would not be a single casualty on the American side. No military involvement, nothing, but the war would be stopped and thousands, if not tens of thousands of Ukrainians and Europeans would be saved.^cclii [But as just discussed, this does not align with the agenda of the global Military Industrial Complex! To whom Creepy is beholden]

Dr. Illarionov alluded to how, until January 2025, [The official end of Creepy Sleepy’s term] a unique opportunity for the Putin regime has arisen under the illegitimate and feckless Biden junta. Jan Jekielek began by quoting the following from the Atlantic as stated by the Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov:

“This is not about Ukraine at all, but the world order. [Hmmm. Sounds like a Globalist agenda – like Alexander Dugin?] The current crisis is a fateful epoch-making moment in modern history. It reflects the battle over what the world order will look like.”^ccliii

To which Dr. Illarionov responded: Putin understands very well that there is a unique window of opportunity during these four years, from 2021 to at least January 2025, while Mr. Biden is the president of the United States, because of the position of Mr Biden and leading members of his administration. This is a unique opportunity to change the world order, because with any other U.S. president, whoever that person would be, whether Republican or Democrat, it would be impossible to do it. But right now, with this particular team in the White House, there’s a unique chance to change world order in favor of tyrants, despots, authoritarian leaders like Mr. Putin, and the Chinese leaders. This is a new chance and this chance should be used. So, that is why they are in a hurry, they are in a rush. That is why they’re using this opportunity to attack Ukraine. That is why they were able to see what’s going on in the middle east with Iran.

That is why last year we entered a very dangerous moment in world history. This dangerous moment will last until at least January 2025, when hopefully there will be another president in the White House, regardless which party that person would represent. But for almost three years in a row, it will be a very dangerous moment that will be used and is being used by Putin and others to remake the world order.^ccliv

To which, the concluding exchanges of this fascinating interview are most poignant:

Mr. Jekielek: What are your final thoughts?

Dr. Illarionov: Several things. First of all, never trust Mr. Putin. For the U.S. administration, for Western countries, for Western society, never trust Putin. This is number one. Second, the war that Mr. Putin is waging against Ukraine is not only a war against Ukraine, this is a war against Europe, against NATO, against the United States, and against the West. Trust what his people are saying. They consider it as a holy war against Western civilization. [Remember the agenda of Alexander Dugin.] As survivors from the Nazi concentration camps taught us, if somebody promises to kill you, take those promises seriously. Don’t disregard those promises. They are very serious about that. And third, the current U.S. administration provides a window of opportunity which is very dangerous for world peace and security. The only way to avoid catastrophe within the remaining three years of this administration, is to radically change attitudes and instead of providing a green light for Putin and other autocrats around the world for their adventures, and radically change the position of the United States and to provide all weapons that Ukraine needs today. This is the best way to achieve peace and security in Ukraine, in Europe and around the world.

Mr. Jekielek: I have to clarify one thing. You said, on one side, don’t trust Vladimir Putin. On the other side, you said you should trust him when he tells you something.

Dr. Illarionov: You need to trust Putin when he promises to kill. You need to trust Putin when he promises to attack. We need to trust Putin when he says that his goal is to capture Europe and to establish new division lines. That’s when we need to trust him.

Mr. Jekielek: Do you mean this December 2021 speech that you mentioned earlier?

Dr. Illarionov: Right.

Mr. Jekielek: Okay.

Dr. Illarionov: We do not have such a right to trust him when he says, “I am peaceful. I am just for peace around the world, and for security” That part of his speech we cannot trust, because for more than two decades Russia has proven just the opposite. He’s using this rhetoric, and he’s using these lectures only to cover up his aggressive intentions against the Russian population within the country and against other countries around the world, against Georgia, against Moldova, against Ukraine, against Syria, against the West, and against Europe. He said it clearly.

The main thing that he could not live with is Western civilization and Western values. From this point of view, he is a deeply anti-Western person. [Just like Alexander Dugin.] He’s using those attacks, not so much against Georgia as Georgia, or Ukraine as Ukraine, because he sees in those countries these elements of Western civilization that are so valuable to us, that we cherish so much. That is why he’s fighting those countries, because he’s afraid that those roots of Western civilization in those countries would flourish in those countries and sooner or later go to Russia as well. This would change his regime, his society, and his country forever. That is his most important fear. Putin understands the West as having the so-called old Western values like freedom, real democracy, rule of law, division of power, and human rights. That is what he considers as the most dangerous to himself. [As would Alexander Dugin.]

He does not care much about all this decadence, about this cancel-culture. [See endnotes #183 to #185] That is actually helpful for him, because it is something that is destroying Western civilization from within. And that is why he’s easily using all this rhetoric about all these issues, but he’s really very much afraid of the real roots of Western civilizations. That is why he’s fighting mercilessly, fighting those values in Russia, in Georgia, in Ukraine, in Europe, and everywhere—freedom, independence, democracy, rule of law, human rights, division of power, freedom of the press, and freedom of expression. [Note earlier when Russia Today rejected my comments not favourable to the Putin agenda.] That’s exactly what he considers as his main chief enemy.

Mr. Jekielek: Dr. Andrei Illarionov, such a pleasure to have you on the show.

Dr. Illarionov: Thank you very much Jan, for inviting me.^cclv

To further emphasise the duplicity of the DEMRATS, is BCC’s little slip of the tongue – thanks to himself mistakenly assuming the microphone was off, when he to the then Russian president Dmitry Medvedev^cclvi at the late March 2012 Seoul Nuclear Security Summit,^cclvii had the following curious exchange:

Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility. [Why was BCC in late March 2012 seemingly so certain of his November 2012 election victory???]

Medvedev: I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.

To which it’s worth noting Barack Closet ComObama’s mentor was his “Uncle” Frank – Frank Marshall Davis — Communist Party USA member #47544, as documented in Paul Kengor’s The Communist^cclviii – a great read for patriots but most uncomfortable for Liberal Ostriches who try to bury this history. One quote from the pro-Soviet communist Uncle Frank is as follows:

“I admire Russia for wiping out an economic system which permitted a handful of rich to exploit and beat gold from the millions of plain people… As one who believes in freedom and democracy for all, I honor the Red nation.” — FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS, 1947 [Clearly Uncle Frank NEVER read Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago!]

To reiterate, when DEMRATS, the greatest hypocrites to ever walk the face of planet Earth, after January 6^th 2021 talk of saving “democracy,” what “democracy” are they talking about? Is it the “democracy” the the “Democratic” People’s Republic of Korea or the former German “Democratic” Republic or the Lao People’s “Democratic” Republic or Uncle Frank’s dearly beloved Soviet Union? Is this the “democracy” that the Department of Homeland Security’s Ministry of mis-dis-mal-information will be striving to “protect”?^cclix And in spite of Putin’s indisputable despotism, in accordance with the Globalist-Duginist playbook, are we to blindly believe the pro-Globalist DEMRAT’s intentions for Ukraine are truly honourable? Or are they beholden to the Military Industrial Complex that demands Ukraine replace Afghanistan? This essay I think, answers these questions respectively with a more than emphatic “NO!” and “YES!”

Ever since Putin commenced his psychological warfare upon Ukraine with his deployment of troops upon Ukraine’s borders, then withdrawals and subsequent redeployment there, I have noticed the more than alarming and growing rift in conservative and freedom movements globally. Namely between the pro-Putin saviour camp, naively perceiving the ex-KGB and pro-Duginist thug as our saviour from the Globalist agenda and its Great Reset, and ones who see through the smokescreen of Duginist subversion and deception. I would wager, that virtually every pro-Putin dupe has no idea of Alexander Dugin, his history and Globalist agenda of ribald hatred for the West and its traditional values – but not of course its modern-day cultural suicide of WOKEISM embodied by toxic and racist neo-Marxist Critical Race/Gender Theory. As Dugin and indeed Andrei Illarionov allude to, these are weapons to undermine the west that Russia has no desire to inflict upon its society.

Putin’s euphemistically dubbed “special operation” into Ukraine has no doubt muddied the waters for conservatives and members of freedom movements globally. Who do we trust? An ex-KGB thug now seemingly a born again UNWOKE Orthodox Christian? Or a duplicitous Western mainstream media that lies at every turn? Do we have to choose between a vapid, blithering and feckless Globalist puppet passing for an ostensibly legitimately elected U.S. president, or an an ex-KGB thug now a seemingly born again UNWOKE Orthodox Christian? Do we believe our corrupt agenda driven Western media when they tell us, their agenda for Ukraine, entitled of course to its independence and its right to be master of its own destiny, but led by the Trudeau idolising and heroic Volodymyr Zelensky is benevolent, unlike the evil and despotic Putin reigning destruction upon its people?

However, if one looks at it all through the lens of Vladimir Putin and his Duginist agenda as the UNWOKE face of the Globalist coin – as opposed to the Trudeau idolising and secular Jew Zelensky’s face on the flip WOKE side, a complex clarity manifests itself as one emerges from the depths of murky waters of deceit and deception to the clarity of sunshine of the land of the lifting FoG. Indeed, Alexander Dugin’s agenda, as documented in his aforementioned literary work FoG – Foundations of Geopolitics – not meant for Western consumption, but rather as a Bible for Russian spooks and elites,^cclx can be a tool of revelation and clarity to help preserve the traditional values – not toxic WOKEISM – of our Western civilisation, that Putin and Dugin, as alluded to by Andrei Illarionov, are in reality, just like their pro-Globalist ally the Chinese Communist Party, sworn to destroy.

Posted in Blog