MY SUBMISSION TO AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT TO PASS THE HUMAN RIGHTS CHILDREN BORN ALIVE PROTECTION ACT 2022

On how to make your own submission, click on the Australian Christian Lobby link HERE.

PDF copy of this submission.

DOCX copy of this submission.

Saturday 04^th March 2023

To the Australian Parliament:

The purpose of this submission is to assert the right to life, care and dignity of babies born alive and left to die following an abortion. The abortion industry and pro-abortion media outlets assert that babies born alive and left to die following an abortion is a ‘myth’,ⁱ ‘nonsensical’,ⁱⁱ and ‘medically unnecessary’.ⁱⁱⁱ However, like so much else today purported by the corrupt and agenda driven mainstream media, such as the alleged safety and efficacy of the Nuremberg Code violating COVID jabs and synonymous mandates,^iv the truth, as revealed by brave, dissident and world renowned doctors, in the face of abject vilification and threats to their careers, is in stark and diametric opposition.^v Likewise, in the case of life, care and dignity of babies born alive and left die following an abortion.

For example, according to official Queensland and Victoria government data, from 2010 to 2020, on average, every week in Queensland and Victoria a baby is born alive and left to die following an abortion.^vi Moreover, only Queensland and Victoria publicly release fulsome data on babies born alive following a failed abortion. In the other jurisdictions, there is only an incomplete and anecdotal picture of the extent of babies born alive and left to die following an abortion.^vii

Most poignant and pertinent here are the findings of the Northern Territory Coronial Inquest into the horrific death of baby Jessica Jane born alive at the Darwin Private Hospital on the morning of 14 July 1998 at 0245 hours.^viii Jessica Jane was delivered after an induction procedure had been carried out with the express purpose of terminating the mother’s pregnancy by aborting the foetus. However, the delivery of an aborted foetus did not occur and instead a baby girl – Jessica Jane – the deceased was born alive. She died at 0405 hours on the same morning after living some 80 minutes. Pursuant to the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act, relevant particulars of the deceased and her parents were provided and a birth certificate issued in due course. The death was reported to the Northern Territory Coroners Office pursuant to the Coroners Act (“the Act”) by the general manager of the Hospital.

The conclusions of Greg Cavanagh, the Territory Coroner in his report dated the 10TH day of APRIL 2000, were as follows:

1) In my view the “moral dilemma” faced by Nurse Williams is not just something for medical practitioners and health professional to consider and deal with. The public have a right to be informed and take part in any debate. The coronial process is the means by which they are informed. This is why it is important that these kind of deaths be reported to the Coroner.

2) The evidence established that the deceased was fully born in a living state. In the 80 minutes of her life she had a separate and independent existence to her mother. In my view, it is important to not let semantics confuse the matter. The deceased was not, and should not be described as a “foetus”, an “aborted foetus”, an “abortus”, a “living foetus” or a “living abortus”, “non-viable foetus”, “live neonate” or anything else that diminishes her status as a human being. Similarly, the purpose of the induction procedure (which was to abort the delivery of a live baby) should not be allowed to diminish her status as a human being. Her life was unexpected and her death was inevitable. However, the first half of this description could be applied to many of us, and the second half to all of us. The deceased having been born alive deserved all the dignity, respect and value that our society places on human life.

3) In my view, the fact that her birth was unexpected and not the desired outcome of the medical procedure, should not result in her, and babies like her, being perceived as anything less than a complete human being. Similarly, the fact that her death was inevitable should also not have the same result. The old, the infirm, the sick, the terminally ill are all entitled to proper medical and palliative care and attention. In my view, newly born unwanted and premature babies should have the same rights. The fact that her death was inevitable should not effect her entitlement to such care and attention.^ix

As such, the killing of a baby surviving an abortion, whether by outright immediate termination of life post-abortion, or as was the case with Jessica Jane in the Darwin private hospital in July 1998, by sheer neglect, is nothing less than infanticide, and should thus be recognised as such. Moreover, legitimisation of such an act does not reside in the shallow reasoning of a defenceless Jessica Jane being incapable of speaking for herself and thus readily facilitating its cowardly sweeping under the carpet. Hence, the following echo from Adolf Hitler’s Third Reich is more than most poignant here:^x

“Bethel is actually Hebrew for “House of God,” and the community, founded by the father of Friedrich von Bodelschwingh in the 1860s, and enhanced by the son, was aptly named. Moreover, for the rest of the decade [1930s] and throughout the war, unlike almost all other church social service institutions, Friedrich would valiantly resist National Socialist orders for them to give up their permanently disabled patients, who were deemed by the regime as “useless eaters” and “life unworthy of life”^xi in accordance with the infamous T-4 euthanasia programme.^xii In 1940, while some patients in other institutions, in response to protests of Friedrich von Bodelschwingh and others, were “spared” from death by gassing, most would still die by lethal injection or by simply being left to die by starvation. [In Jessica Jane’s case – just sheer neglect] In the madness and barbarity of the entire twelve years of the Third Reich, Bethel would remain as an oasis of peace and the very best of German Christian culture.^xiii”

Indeed, a modern day disciple of “useless eaters” and “life unworthy of life”^xiv who claims on his website that “History began when humans invented gods, and will end when humans become gods”,^xv is none other than the trans-humanist Yuval Noah Harari – an Israeli public intellectual, historian and a professor in the Department of History at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem^xvi and senior advisor to Klaus Schwab.^xvii The latter is a son of Eugen Schwab, a National Socialist in Hitler’s Reich, and was the founder of the infamous WEF – World Economic Forum in 1971^xviii and architect of the recent Sri Lankan economic collapse^xix – in spite of its ESG – Environmental Social Governance score of 98.1%!^xx Harari further claims that humans are “hackable animals” and “that fundamental Christian values and doctrine of freedom, free will and the soul will become a thing of the past!”^xxi Of course, such fundamental Christian rights do not include the pro-abortion “right” for a mother to murder her own baby with its own unique DNA separate to that of the said mother.

Hence, given the self-evident truth just discussed, my conscious demands no less than the Federal Parliament passing the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Act 2022 – as would indeed, the deepest self-examination of anyone else’s conscious, be they either pro-abortion^xxii or pro-life.

Yours Sincerely

Vincent Barwinski

Posted in

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment *

Name *

Email *

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Latest Releases