مسند الإمام أحمد بن حنبل (Musnad al-Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, v. 1, p. 399, hadith# 3788).
https://archive.org/stream/IslamicBooks-HadithPart10/MusnadAhmadBinHanbalArabic-english-Vol3_djvu.txtI have uploaded the PDF Copy to my site at:https://vincebarwinski.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/MusnadAhmadBinHanbalArabic-english-Vol3.pdfHowever, you need the TEXT file for text searching which cannot be done in the PDF.https://archive.org/details/IslamicBooks-HadithPart10/MusnadAhmadBinHanbalArabic-english-Vol3/page/n365/mode/2up?
q=climbingThe Videos by David Wood and Raymond Ibrahim:Who ‘RODE’ Muhammad All Night Long — and Why? – Raymond Ibrahim – 29 April 2025https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFa8XuI4YTACan Muslims Explain the Weirdest Story About Muhammad Ever? – David Wood – 2 May 2025https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtTYxxmVpvAIn text file, search for text:
“started climbing on the Messenger”Musnad of ‘Abdullah bin Mas’ood 4 i 366 3788. It was narrated from ‘Abdullah bin Mas’ood:[Emphasis added is mine][QUOTE:]Abdullah said: The Messenger of Allah asked me to come with him, so we set out until I came to such and such a place. He drew
a line for me and said to me: “Stay there, within this line, and do not come out. If you come out you will perish.” So I stayed
within it. The Messenger of Allah went on, as far as one could throw a stone or a little further - or words to that effect. Then he mentioned the shapes of figures as if they were black people; they were not wearing any clothes but I could not see
their private parts, and they were tall and slim. They came and started climbing on the Messenger of Allah, and the Prophet
of Allah started reciting Qur’an to them. He said; And they started coming and going around me, getting in my way. ‘Abdullah said: And I got very scared of them, so
I sat down – or words to that effect. When dawn came, they began to leave – or words to that effect. Then the Messenger of
Allah came, looking drawn and tired, or almost ill because of their climbing over him. He said: “Ifeel very tired” – or words
to that effect.The Messenger of Allah put his head in my lap – or words to that effect. Then these figures came, wearing long white garments
– or words to that effect. The Messenger of Allah had gone to sleep. ‘Abdullah said: And I felt more afraid of them than I had the
first time. (‘Arim said in his hadeeth:) they said to one another: This slave of Allah has been given something good – or words
to that effect - his eyes are sleeping, or his eye is sleeping – or words to that effect - but his heart is awake.[UNQUOTE]My concluding thoughts??Well, I could see Queers for Palestine in Gaza proclaiming this bizarre Hadith of Muhammad's midnight sodomite tryst in defence of their
lives, as they are tossed from the top of buildings!
But ultimately, the answer for mankind does not lie in the illiterate, self-indulgent, warmongering, mass-murdering and
narcissistic paedophile and sodomite that was Allah’s messenger Muhammad, nor Isa – عِيسَى, the fake Jesus of the Quran,
nor theself-loathing and free loading Jew by descent that was Karl Marx himself, nor his mass-murdering disciples of Lenin, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Che Guevara, Castro, Kim Il-Sung and Pol Pot, nor in the reincarnation of the National
Socialist ideology of Adolf Hitler, espoused by his Holocaust denying worshippers and apologists, nor in the “Progressive”
fake god of WOKE… but rather, in the Son of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob – the selfless, compassionate, merciful and divine immaculate miracle worker of;
PROMPTED AI GENERATED IMAGE COURTESY OF VINCENT NOVIELLO
Dear Mr Ambassador,
The recent article published by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), titled “Australia, UK, France and other nations call for immediate end to war in Gaza“i, dated 22 July 2025, has prompted this letter as a gesture of reassurance to His Excellency and the people of Israel. We wish to convey that not all Australians share the views expressed by this nation’s elected representatives. On the contrary, we believe that many citizens of this country would feel both disheartened and embarrassed by Australia’s endorsement of the joint statement referenced in the aforementioned article.
The statement, as we see it, reflects a profound ignorance of the situation on the ground in Gaza. Moreover, it cites few, if any, corroborated sources to substantiate the claims made by Hamas regarding the number of civilian deaths resulting from Israel’s justified military operations.
The following points are offered in response to this misunderstanding:
In contemporary discourse, there is often a misplaced confidence in the precision of modern warfare — a belief that surgical strikes and advanced targeting technologies can isolate combatants while sparing civilians. While modern weaponry is indeed more accurate than the indiscriminate bombing raids of past conflicts, such as those in World War II, the reality on the ground tells a different story, particularly in the context of urban warfare. Cities are dense, complex environments where military targets are often embedded within civilian populations. Hence, Hamas’ repeated use of human shields in schools, hospitals, mosques and the like,ii often used in tandem as repositories for weapons. Explosive weapons — regardless of how “smart” they may be — are inherently blunt instruments. Their destructive effects radiate beyond intended targets, and their use in populated areas almost guarantees unintended casualties.
Collateral damage, then, is not merely a tragic possibility but an inevitable consequence of armed conflict. Innocent civilians — including women, children, and the elderly — are frequently caught in the crossfire due to a range of factors: the indiscriminate nature of military-grade explosives, equipment malfunction, human miscalculation, flawed intelligence, and failures in command and control. Cultural misunderstandings and asymmetric warfare further complicate targeting decisions. While the laws of armed conflict seek to limit civilian harm, the very design and purpose of weapons — to incapacitate and destroy — make complete precision impossible. In war, the line between combatant and non-combatant is often blurred not by intent, but by the unforgiving realities of the battlefield.
Regrettably, mainstream media is not a neutral observer. Rather than prioritising factual accuracy, media organisations frequently shape narratives to align with their editorial positions and ideological leanings. This tendency contributes to widespread misperceptions of complex conflicts. Moreover, the reporting of corrupt global mainstream media, including our aforementioned public broadcaster, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC)iii and the New York Times,iv seems to disturbingly mirror Article 15 of the Hamas Charter:
“The indoctrination campaign must involve ulama, educators, teachers and information and media experts, as well as all intellectuals, especially the young people and the sheikhs of Islamic movements.”v
In this environment, groupthink has become a powerful and dangerous force — particularly when unverified claims or emotionally charged imagery, often AI generated,vi are disseminated as fact.vii All too often, a single-source allegation is echoed globally before it has been critically assessed. This phenomenon affects not only public opinion but also the highest levels of political leadership. Under pressure to appear morally resolute and decisive, heads of state may act hastily — issuing condemnations, joining coalitions, or abandoning long-standing diplomatic relationships — often without the due diligence such decisions warrant.
One tragic case in point being the murder in May of this year of two of your Washington DC embassy staffers; Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim, themselves a young couple soon to be engaged, by the leftist radical Elias Rodriguez, he in turn enraged by toxic groupthink disseminating the fake narrative of 14,000 Gazan babies facing eminent death.viii Moreover, one of us was mailed correspondence by the NGO Actionaid Australia,ix attempting to solicit funding, using this said untruth, compelling the writing of a very lengthy and terse reply, demanding for one thing, how they obtained personal details.x
Such performative responses, as demonstrated by our own leaders — in particular Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong — prioritises optics over substance. Actions taken to project virtue or resolve may ultimately undermine truth, justice, and long-term strategic interests. When policy is shaped by headlines rather than facts, the consequences are profound: diminished credibility, unnecessary diplomatic strain, and the erosion of principled alliances. In such an environment, propaganda thrives, nuance disappears, and governance becomes reactionary rather than responsible. The need for sober, independent analysis has never been greater, yet it is increasingly lost in a sea of politicised noise.
The taking of civilian hostages? (Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions expressly prohibits this.)
The use of civilian infrastructure for military purposes? (Article 51(7) of Additional Protocol I prohibits the use of civilians or civilian objects to shield military targets.)
Combatants disguising themselves as civilians? (The requirement for combatants to wear a uniform or a fixed, distinctive sign recognisable at a distance is laid out in Article 44(3) of Additional Protocol I.)
Moreover, the notion of the UN as a fair broker of peace, is gravely questionable when one considers that the nefarious UN agency of UNRWA has indoctrinated Palestinian children to hate Jews,xv [Search for “UNRWA”] and to glorify their twisted so-called notion of martyrdom, embodying suicide to facilitate mass-murder of Jews, as the ultimate act to ensure their passage to their eternal brothel-paradise of virgins. [eg: Quran 4:57 – referring to “purified wives” plural for what is determined as “good deeds” – eg; October 7th.] Hence, the goal of the Palestinians to ultimately come to love their children more than they hate the Jews, is generations distant at best.xvi
Foreign Minister Wong’s statement that: “Australia has consistently been part of the international call on Israel to allow a full and immediate resumption of aid to Gaza, in line with the binding orders of the International Court of Justice” is yet another example of wilful blindness. The proverbial elephant in the room is ignored: any meaningful path to peace must begin with the release of hostages. Co-signatory nations would do far more good by directing their diplomatic energy toward pressuring Hamas to take that essential first step. Moreover, the silence of our Federal government and corrupt mainstream media over the Syrian Jihadist regime’s ongoing genocide of the Druze, and Israel’s attempts to mitigate it, is as deafening in magnitude as their rank narrative-driven hypocrisy.
We, the undersigned, hold a markedly different view — one of solidarity with the State of Israel and the courageous Israeli people. We regard Israel as a beacon of moral integrity and ethical leadership, and we affirm the profound and enduring contributions of the Jewish people to humanity.
Thus, in conclusion, we wish you well and may God continue to help the Biblical homeland of Israel, the bastion of Judeo-Christian Western civilisation in the Middle-East, in fighting the dark forces of the world.
xix https://vincebarwinski.com/2025/05/31/my-objection-to-soros-funded-actionaid-using-in-effect-dawaganda-to-solicit-funding-from-me/?kinsta-cache-cleared=true
I want people to realise you don’t need to be a young strong man. You can be a child like MARIAN was during World War II, to an elderly person and have the courage to stand up for truth and freedom. We need UNITY to stand up to current and future tyranny. I want people to be inspired by MARIAN’S example and to actually look at ALL the sub-sections and not waste his example.DON’T WASTE IT.
Back in September 2024, upon recommendation from my mate Vince in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, I obtained a huge Freedom of Information documenti[Search for “Molnupiravir”iiAND “REMDESIVIR”iii]; which reveals it seems, a fundamental violation of the Hippocratic principle “in doing no harm.” In particular, the administering to Marian by Melbourne’s Alfred Hospital of thedangerous drug Molnupiravir.ivMoreover, while not appearing to be administered, another dangerous drug calledREMDESIVIRv(Known colloquially as “run death is near”), which likewise was proclaimed as dangerous by many brave dissident medical professionals who appeared at Republican Senator Ron Johnson’s“COVID A Second Opinion Conference”viin Washington DC on Monday the 24th January 2022, was listed as a legitimate drug on Marian’s treatment schedule.
Here in the city of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, where I live, medical staff including doctors, nurses, ambulance staff, as well as fire brigade and police, who did not get the so-called COVID vaccine, can’t go back to work, even now. What about getting justice for all the people killed and injured by the jab, all the families, torn apart as well as the all the injustices over the past five years etc. Issues like this are world wide. MARIAN already knew how the world really worked, back in the 1940s. Use MARIAN’S example to help UNITE people.SHARE HIS WEBSITE. It needs to reach millions to help make our world a better place for all of us. We need your help and the help of everyone you know.
NOTE: On Saturdays, Freedom Fighters use to walk around the city when we had larger numbers.
So NOW, we go to BURKE ST MALL at the corner of Elizabeth (near large purse sculpture) and watch most people numbering in thousands, going to shops, cafes, on/off trams – most ignore us. We are in the mall for their benefit and your benefit. We are here for everyone’s benefit. Some of the people walking past us, verbally abuse us. Too many people are apathetic, lack courage, don’t care, are in self-denial, and are lost. I believe if large numbers of people looked beyond MARIAN’S newsletter, and bothered to look at the sub-sections-quotes, recollections, etc, links to other sites, would press on the truth grenade.
You spoke eloquently I must say in regard to saving the American “Democracy”, so I think you will love what I have written in the second paragraph on page 10. To which, I think the term you are really looking for is Constitutional Republic. You leftists seem to suffer a chronic allergy to this term!
… I see you believe in the fake genocide in the Gaza of FAKESTINE![Search for “Mohsen” top of page 15] FAKE as stated by Zuheir Mohsen; the Military Department head of the PLOifrom 1971 to 1979,iiin an interview with the Dutch newspaperTrouw, on March 31st, 1977,iii
“There are no differences between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese. We are all part of one nation. It is only for political reasons that we carefully underline our Palestinian identity…. yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity serves only tactical purposes. The founding of a Palestinian state is a new tool in the continuing battle against Israel.”iv
As Trevor Loudon would put it, your narrative of the fake genocide in the Gaza of FAKESTINE, serves as yet another classic example of truth being whatever serves the Revolution, and at the same time, in emphasizing the Red–Green Axis in its complementary Islamic context, whatever serves the Global Intifada.
Moreover, Xi Van Fleet’s brilliant and incisive postulate dovetails exquisitely with the chilling parallel concept of Ilich Ramírez Sánchez, a.k.a. Carlos the Jackal, who in 2003, from his prison cell, published a book called Revolutionary Islam that urged:
“all revolutionaries, including those of the left, even atheists,”
to accept the leadership of militant jihadists – Osama bin Laden key among them. His reasoning being:
“Only a coalition of Marxists and Islamists can destroy the United States.”
That book was in French and titled L’islam revolutionnaire (Revolutionary Islam) which is saturated with calls for the fusion of Marxism and Islam – hence the just aforementioned term: Red–Green Axis of Marxism (RED) and Islam (GREEN). To which, it’s worth noting Muhammad Amin al-Husayni (189?-1974) who was the Mufti (chief Muslim Islamic legal religious authority) of Jerusalem under the political authority of the British Mandate in Palestine from 1921 to 1937. Then, during WWII, from radio studios in Berlin, al-Husayni collaborated with the German and Italian governments by broadcasting pro-Axis, anti-British, and anti-Jewish propaganda via radio to the Arab world; inciting violence against Jews and the British authorities in the Middle East; and recruiting young men of Islamic faith for service in German military, Waffen-SS, and auxiliary units. Hence, in reiterating, one could conclude little wonder that the Quran is a logical follow up read to Adolf Hitler’s turgid 1925 bookMein Kampf. [The latter I have indeed read, and the former I am one-third of the way through.]
For Adolf Hitler’s National Socialists, their dialectical scapegoat was one of race, focussed predominantly on their perceived Untermensch or sub-human status of the Jewish people, but certainly others deemed as non-Aryan such as black Africans. And indeed, in the American radical-leftist WOKE 2020 Summer riots, their dialectic was as well, certainy one of race, but with a racial profile virtually inverted from that of Hitler and his National Socialists. Now the white people were their racial dialectical scapegoat, rather than the traditional dialectical Marxist scapegoat of Class as defined by Lenin and Mao. Such a dialectic had proven itself not so effective in Australia and the America, but to which, race, and later gender, has proven far more potent.
To which the American Marxist entities of Black Lives Matter, Antifa and Freedom Road Socialist Organisation (FRSO), of which the latterproudly admitted its role in sparking the riots in late May 2020 in the wake of George Floyd’s death, have exploited to the utmost. However, three or so years later in the aftermath of October 7th, these same Cultural WOKE neo-Marxist entities turned on a dime to embrace like Hitler and his National Socialists, mankind’s oldest hatred of anti-Semitism or Jew Hatred, which has proven itself to be, down through the millennia time and time again, the veritable canary in the coal mine of societies in crisis.
This time however, it is with the Red–Green Axis of WOKE-Cultural-neo-Marxism[InterNational Socialism rather than just National Socialism] and Islam, that Jew Hatred has manifested itself with a chillingly much more global appeal and reach than in Hitler’s Third Reich of the 1930s. To which a major focal point being the Islamist agenda to undermine Israel via the dubious narrative of Jewish colonial occupiers oppressing “indigenous” Palestinians, of whom the latter, in reiterating, have never had any historical basis in fact as a nation. [Search for “Mohsen”].
However, in having for the time being the common threads of the obliteration of Christianity and Western Civilisation – in particular America, defined by itsConstitutional Republic [NOT the Democracy of Mobocracy] of its Founding Fathers, the Cultural neo-Marxists such as yourselves, have no concept of the dangerous and ruthless Jihadist mindset they and yourselves are currently playing PattyCake with, of which the Jihadists regard yourselves and your WOKE Cultural neo-Marxist comrades, as nothing more than useful idiots
Sounds far-fetched? Not really when you read the Islamic Constitution in two parts from the website of the Canadian Chapter of Hizb ut-Tahrir (Party of Liberation) at:
OR … the very similar 2014 Draft Islamic Constitution of Australia, since removed from the website of its Australian Chapter [Curiously, as I just discovered, this website was taken down sometime between mid-March and May 31st 2025], proclaiming “AUSTRALIA UNDER ISLAM in 25 years – which implies by 2039.
Ultimately, the answer for mankind does not lie in the illiterate, self-indulgent, warmongering, mass-murdering and narcissistic paedophile that was Allah’s messenger Muhammad, nor Isa – عِيسَى, the fake Jesus of the Quran, nor the self-loathing and free loading Jew by descent that was Karl Marx himself, nor his mass-murdering disciples of Lenin, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Che Guevara, Castro, Kim Il-Sung and Pol Pot, nor in the reincarnation of the National Socialist ideology of Adolf Hitler, espoused by his Holocaust denying worshippers and apologists, nor in YOUR “Progressive” fake GOD of WOKE… but rather, in the Son of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob – the selfless, compassionate, merciful and divine immaculate miracle worker of;
Subject: How did you get my name and address to send your in effect “Dawaganda” on the fake famine in Gaza, facilitating in part, the stirring up of the global maelstrom of anti-Semitism since October 7, 2023? Elias Rodriguez of the Marxist-Leninist Party of Socialism and Liberation (PSL), being a case in point.
I will start with the first thought that entered my mind. Namely:
“How did you get my name and address to mail to me your in effect, veiled “Dawaganda” on the fake famine in Gaza, facilitating in part, the stirring up of the global maelstrom of anti-Semitism since October 7, 2023?” [I will get back to your contrived Gazan famine later.]
In this purged article at the top, one can see a black and white photo of leftist protesters, gathered outside then Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s house to demand justice for Laquan McDonald and an end to the “ethnic cleansing” of Chicago vis-à-vis gentrification on October 20, 2017 – the anniversary of McDonald’s “murder” by Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke. Although, I doubt people of this WOKE-ilk would care for Black Chicago residents infuriated over a migrant surge, courtesy of the Biden-Harris open border policy. But I digress.
However, what I wish to draw your attention to, is a “gentleman” just to the right of centre in the photo, wearing glasses and a chequered shirt, who looks suspiciously like Elias Rodriguez, when I compare him to the photo of Rodriguez from an Indian Times article. Moreover, the black woman in front of him with the Afro hair style, recalls for me the infamous Marxist Angela Davis.
“There are no differences between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese. We are all part of one nation. It is only for political reasons that we carefully underline our Palestinian identity…. yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity serves only tactical purposes. The founding of a Palestinian state is a new tool in the continuing battle against Israel.”
Hence, with all this fake and ignored authentichistory, the narrative of Jewish people in Israel being occupiers, rather than indigenous people of the land, as verified with genetic evidence, in concert with the suppressing of the historical truth of the Arabs conquering and colonising lands that were Christian for hundreds of years before the rise of Islam in the 7th century, has been perpetuated. In part, by the spurious notion of the modern-day Palestinians descending from the Philistines of King David’s time, in spite of the fact, that by the time of Jesus Christ, the Hellenic Philistines had ceased to exist as a people group for five centuries, in the wake of the Babylonian captivity.
The Romans, following their mass evictions of Jews in the wake of 70 AD siege of Jerusalem and the Bar Kokhba Revolt of 132-135 AD [Bottom of page 13 to 14], to spite the troublesome Jews, adopted Syria Palaestina, (Roman Palestine) as the name of what had been the Roman province of Judea, after two ancient kingdoms Assyria and Philistine, both ancient mortal enemies of the Jews, and both of which have long since died out. To reiterate, this in spite of the fact, that the Philistines had disappeared from historical written record about six to seven centuries earlier, when the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar II (reign ca. 605 BC – c. 562 BC) conquered the region and destroyed several cities, including Ashkelon. This Roman province had nothing to do with the modern day Palestinian state, either geographically or ethnically.
Yet, to reiterate, in spite of this historical truth backed with endless archaeological evidence, the aforementioned KGB contrived notion since the early 1960s, of the Jewish people as occupiers in the Holy Land, has persisted, and indeed, since October 7, 2023, has been amplified exponentially. In no small part, thanks to the Islamist mindset being compelled to think of the Holy Land as now permanent Islamic land, given that from the seventh century until the end of the First World War under the Ottomans, it was in one form or another, under Islamic control. To which ties in with the Hamas genocidal catch cry being generally recognised in English as:
“From the River to the sea, Palestine will be free”
… but according to my research, much more emphatically in Arabic as truly meaning:
In an apartheid state, some get to vote, and some don’t. In an apartheid state, some get an education and some don’t. However, in Israel, Arabs vote, and in 2021, for the first time in modern Israel’s history, Arab parliament members had a major say on whether a government is formed and who indeed would form such a government. Moreover, in Israel, the enrolment of Arab students in higher education is exploding, more than doubling between 2008 and 2018. And per capita, Arab-Israeli Christians outpace Israeli-Jews in higher education degrees.
Olga Meshoe, a black South African human rights activist, says explicitly:
Olga elucidates that the BDS movement advocating the Boycotting, Divestment and Sanctioning of Israel, is a slick propaganda effort built on lies. Having lived in South Africa, and spent a fair amount of time in Israel, she is more than qualified to make this assessment, unlike placard waving ignorant Soros-funded leftist-dupes in the West. In particular, pro-COVID-jab leftist-indoctrinated Catastrophic Climate Change Scam Greta Thunberg wannabe high school students skipping school to bellow the pro-Hamas chant.
Olga highlighted how in apartheid South Africa, black people were separated at every level from education to drinking fountains. Blacks couldn’t vote, couldn’t own land, and could not live next to or use the same transportation system as whites. Her grandfather told her of the story of a little white boy kicking and humiliating him in public, and all he could do, was to say:
Why does Olga Meshoe, a black South African human rights activist, speak up for Israel? The state branded as being apartheid by pro-COVID-jab leftist-indoctrinated Catastrophic Climate Change Scam Greta Thunberg wannabe high school students, skipping school to bellow the pro-Hamas-terrorist chant.
Well aside from alluding to the state of apartheid that effectively exists in the Arab state of Egypt, in regard to the Coptic Christians, and likewise in Iraq for their Christians, it is because, as she boldly proclaims, lies empower evil! Lies about blacks empowered apartheid in South Africa, and lies about the Jews made the Holocaust possible. And right now, lies about the Jews, has led to a staggering multi-fold increase in acts of anti-Semitism, where on many Western university campuses, Jewish students fear for their lives, and George Soros-funded-pro-Hamas-terrorist rallies, such as the early October 2023 Sydney Opera House rally, in a scene reminiscent of the early 1930s crumbling Weimar Germany, calling for the gassing of the Jews!
Hence, when I discovered that Actionaid has received funding from the Soros Open Society Foundation, this was a blaring RED SIREN for me, as indicated by the title of my March 2024 essay; I am a Zionist but George Soros and the UN are not – Hamas Attack on Israel on October 7th 2023 and the subsequent Globalist engineered propaganda war to obliterateIsrael’s right to exist – which is discussed in depth on the UK Freedom media outlet The Exposć. [For far-right-wing anti-Semites, I have found from personal experience and research, they have no concept of the nominal self-loathing Jew that is George Soros, being an anti-Zionist. Moreover they, including for example Stew Peters, seem to believe in the flat-earth theory, while leftist anti-Semites such as yourselves and your darling Greta Thunberg, embrace the no less ludicrous and irrational Catastrophic Climate ChangeMarxist Scam.]
And in the wake of October 7th, Artificial Intelligence has been summoned to further perpetuate lies against Israel by the creation and circulation of fake images. For example,Adobe Caught Selling Dishonest AI-Generated Images As Actual Photos of Israel “Violence”. This was first reported on the Australian News Outlet Crikeyon November 1st 2023, but plenty more have reportedit since. However, one of the most obviously damning is an image shown in the Irish Sun on November 24th 2023,of an injured little boy, standing as he raises his left bloodied left hand with six fingers, as his mother lays dead to his left. In the same article, another AI generated image depicts a crying baby trapped in rubble in Gaza, while another shows a toddler standing in rubble after an airstrike. This conflict is certainly as much an information/propaganda war as it is kinetic and bloody.
Amir Tsarfati, the Israeli Jewish host of the YouTube channel Behold Israel, streamed on May 28, 2025, from about 20 minutes in, told of a supposedly 38 year-old female Palestinian Doctor Alaa al-Najjar, in a so-called real photo mourning the death of ostensibly nine of her ten children at the hands of the Israeli military. However, the photo, as stated by Amir Tsarfati, is AI generated!
This on its own, does not disprove the story that Doctor Alaa al-Najjar lost nine of her children, but why do pro-Hamas types feel the need to circulate AI generated images as genuine? Moreover, the constant use of recycled images months old, claiming for example, an image is a photo of the al-Najjar children, when in fact, it was of the Abu Daqa children, who were killed in an Israeli airstrike in Khan Yunis on March 20, 2025.
Moreover, as defines the aforementioned corrupt global mainstream media and the social media spreading AI and recycled images to promote their anti-Zionist agenda, the real starvation in Sudan receives next to ZERO media attention, because, as stated by Amir Tsarfati, their mantra of:
“NO Jews …. NO News!”
Invariably, time and time again, they place complete trust in the narratives reported by Hamas. A trust terribly misplaced as was clearly illustrated in the bombing of the Al-Ahli Arab hospital in mid-October 2023, when Hamas claimed Israel had levelled Al-Ahli Arab hospital with an airstrike, eliciting outrage from around the world as its allies screamed war crime and the media rushed to prop up Hamas’ story. For example, “Pravda On The Hudson” – New York Timeshas been reported as doing as such by the no less left-leaning Politico, before being forced to hastily alter their story.
Moreover, as Abraham Wyner, Professor of Statistics and Data Science at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and Faculty Co-Director of the Wharton Sports Analytics and Business Initiative documented back in March 2024, in regard to data released by the Hamas-controlled Health Ministry[page 39], and accepted with ludicrous implicit trust by the then administration of the fraudulently electedObama-cardboard-cut-out President Joe Creepy Sleepy Biden: [In the days preceding his disastrous late June 2024 debate with Donald Trump, did you believe the corrupt global mainstream media narrative that he was sharp, lucid and cognisant?]
“Here’s the problem with this data: The numbers are not real. That much is obvious to anyone who understands how naturally occurring numbers work. The casualties are not overwhelmingly women and children, and the majority may be Hamas fighters. If Hamas’ numbers are faked or fraudulent in some way, there may be evidence in the numbers themselves that can demonstrate it. While there is not much data available, there is a little, and it is enough: From Oct. 26 until Nov. 10, 2023, the Gaza Health Ministry released daily casualty figures that include both a total number and a specific number of women and children.”
“Taken together, what does this all imply? While the evidence is not dispositive, it is highly suggestive that a process unconnected or loosely connected to reality was used to report the numbers. Most likely, the Hamas ministry settled on a daily total arbitrarily. We know this because the daily totals increase too consistently to be real. Then they assigned about 70% of the total to be women and children, splitting that amount randomly from day to day. Then they in-filled the number of men as set by the predetermined total. This explains all the data observed.”
AND …
“The truth can’t yet be known and probably never will be. The total civilian casualty count is likely to be extremely overstated. Israel estimates that at least 12,000 fighters have been killed. If that number proves to be even reasonably accurate, then the ratio of noncombatant casualties to combatants is remarkably low: at most 1.4 to 1 and perhaps as low as 1 to 1. By historical standards of urban warfare, where combatants are embedded above and below into civilian population centers, this is a remarkable and successful effort to prevent unnecessary loss of life while fighting an implacable enemy that protects itself with civilians.”
In its inexorable hypocrisy, as a distraction from its litany of ills, the Marxist ANC regime of South Africa, targets Israel internationally on charges of genocide. As the British journalist Brendan O’Neill put it:
“Then there’s South Africa, the nation that brought the case against Israel. Its imperious judges reeled off charge after charge against the Jewish State at the ICJ this week. You’ll forgive my gagging. ANC-run South Africa is one of the most corrupt regimes in the world. The heirs to Mandela have catastrophically failed to make good his promise of a new, fair nation. South Africa under their rule has some of the highest rates of murder and rape in the world. Poverty is rampant. The ANC has massacred black workers who were merely campaigning for better pay. It failed to counter murderous pogroms against Zimbabwean immigrants. It presides over a country where, for millions, life is brutish and short. Perhaps it should save some of the fashionable [WOKE] sympathy it feels for the people of Gaza for its own long-suffering citizens.”
“The absence of a public condemnation from South Africa regarding Hamas’s actions in Gaza, raises significant concerns. This silence is more conspicuous given the recent hosting of a delegation from Iran and Hamas in South Africa. Such actions could be interpreted as direct support to Hamas’s tactics, including using civilians as human shields and diverting aid for military purposes and the building of tunnels, rather than humanitarian relief sent to the Palestinian people, which was intercepted by Hamas. This stance raises questions about South Africa’s position on these critical human rights issues and its role in international diplomacy. Our government’s lead counsel in the case, is a trustee of an International NGO, ‘Lawyers for Palestine’, which appears to be the source of much of their application.”
For your ilk, it always seems to me, that the onus is always but always, without fail, on Israel for the release of hostages and to make peace. Never, but never is any onus put upon the mass-murdering sadistic Jihadist sociopaths that are Hamas, complying to the very letter of their infamous charter and synonymous Hadiths, Sharia and Quran, [more on that soon]as they inflict suffering not just on Israeli hostages and Israel, but on their very own people, as emphasised for example, by their aforementioned use of human shields in hospitals, schools and mosques. Peace will only come in Gaza, when the Gazans, in particular those baying for the blood of released hostages, learn to love their children more than they hate the Jews.
However, as the nefarious UN agency of UNRWA has indoctrinated Palestinian children to hate Jews, [Search for “UNRWA”] and to glorify their twisted so-called notion of martyrdom, embodying suicide to facilitate mass-murder of Jews, as the ultimate act to ensure their passage to their eternal brothel-paradise of virgins, [eg: Quran 4:57 – referring to “purified wives” plural for what is determined as “good deeds” – eg; October 7th.] the goal of the Palestinians to ultimately come to love their children more than they hate the Jews, is generations distant at best. Hence, when I read your your unsolicited correspondence to me, I was hardly engendered with confidence when you stated that your operations into Gaza, were facilitated and overseen by the UN! Nor does your affiliation with our Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), given it being under the administration of the Marxist Labor government of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong; both of whom, with their rabid and quintessential leftist anti-Israel mindsets, are written about extensively in Trevor Loudon’s recent book:
A most poignant and incisive follow up to which I quote from Hugh Fitzgerald on Jihad Watch dated May 12, 2025, as Greta Thunberg’s WOKE reputation, having since post October 7th, been transformed from Fake Climate Crisis to Jew Hating Middle East expert, gets caught up in the Hugh Fitzgerald collateral trashing of rabid WOKE Jew Hatred:
“Greta Thunberg and her Freedom Flotilla friends clearly don’t know much about international law. Article 23 of the Fourth Geneva Convention explicitly allows a state to withhold humanitarian aid from an enemy combatant under certain conditions. To wit:
The obligation of a High Contracting Party to allow the free passage of the consignments [humanitarian aid] indicated in the preceding paragraph is subject to the condition that this Party is satisfied that there are no serious reasons for fearing:
(a) that the consignments may be diverted from their destination,
(b) that the control may not be effective, or
(c) that a definite advantage may accrue to the military efforts or economy of the enemy through the substitution of the above-mentioned consignments for goods which would otherwise be provided or produced by the enemy or through the release of such material, services or facilities as would otherwise be required for the production of such goods.
Hamas does “divert aid from its [intended] destination.” Much of that aid is “diverted” from the people of Gaza to Hamas. Until now “control” of the distribution has been nearly nonexistent. Hamas does have a “definite advantage to accrue to it” when its fighters know they can take vast quantities of the aid for themselves and their families, which helps Hamas sustain its men, and even gain new recruits. And Hamas sells much of the aid it steals to the Gazans who were supposed to have received the aid for free.
In other words, all three of the permissible reasons for withholding humanitarian aid, as set out in the Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 23, have been met. Would someone make sure Greta Thunberg is sent a link to Article 23? She might even read it.
Brendan O’Neill takes her to task for her latest cause, and the malignancy of her attack on the tiny, embattled Jewish state that is now fighting a seven-front war for its survival, here: “Greta Thunberg’s moral siege of Israel,” by Brendan O’Neill, Spiked, May 7, 2025:
“People talk about the siege of Gaza but few are prepared to reckon with the siege of Israel. For years, the Jewish State has been subjected to a double siege. There’s the physical siege by the armies of antisemites that surround it and which dream of its obliteration. And there’s the moral siege by the intellectuals of the West. By our credentialed classes, our activist set, our literary elites, all of whom increasingly derive their fantasy of virtue from their hostility to the Jewish nation. And some of whom also dream of its destruction. ‘From the river to sea’, they cry, to let the world know that their utopia is a Middle East with no Jewish homeland.”
Yes, seemingly all of a sudden, since the atrocities of October 7, 2023, when six thousand members of Hamas, accompanied by a few hundred civilians who wanted to join in the fun, smashed into Israel from Gaza and proceeded to rape, torture, mutilate, and murder 1,200 Israelis and kidnap 251 others, antisemites have been having a field day. Israel has become the object of nonstop vilification, and many people, from campus brownshirts to UN officials, have no problem demanding that “from the river to the sea/Palestine will be free,” which can mean only one thing: Israel must be destroyed, in order to be replaced by a 23rd Arab state. As for the Israelis themselves, those who are not killed in the fighting that will undoubtedly ensue must be expelled.
Brendan O’Neill, not for the first time, has given Greta Thunberg the drubbing she deserves. But don’t worry. She’ll be in the news again very soon. She has been formally diagnosed with obsessive compulsive disorder, and from here on out, her obsession will be the mighty empire of Israel that has been, in her view, the source of so much woe. She hasn’t a syllable to spare for the mass famine in Sudan, or Pakistan’s aggression against India, or the murders of Alawites and Druze in Syria, or Russia’s war against Ukraine.”
“Would you want to live next door to a country that its only reason for existence, as stated in its Quran, Hadiths and Charter, was to exterminate you?”
Put another way, if Israel laid down all its arms, every Jew in Israel would be slaughtered. But if every Arab laid down its arms, there would be peace. To which, in quoting the infamous Hamas Charter:
“The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.” [Sahih Muslim 2922; Book 54, Hadith 103]
“Allah’s Messenger said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.’”” [Sahih al-Bukhari 2926; Book 56, Hadith 139]
“that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).” [Sahih al-Bukhari 5133; Book 67, Hadith 69]
Which makes one wonder how you can compare in the same breathe, this self-indulgent, warmongering and narcissistic paragon of Islam – itself the cornerstone of the Charter of mass murder that defines Hamas, to the selfless, compassionate, merciful and divine immaculate miracle worker of Jesus Christ.
Back in March 2024, I completed reading the turgid diatribe of Jew Hatred that was Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Then, I started reading the Quran, and after 14 months, I am only 37% of the way through reading it.
However, that is way more than enough for me to conclude that the Quran is a disjointed, incoherent, misogynistic and turgid diatribe of Christian and Jew hatred, that as such, is a most logical follow up to Hitler’s Mein Kampf! Which has been further reinforced from the Hadiths and sections of Sharia Law manual of the Reliance of the Traveller, revealing Islam as much more of a political ideology than a religion, that I have read and quoted here.
In writing this message to you, it can be implied that I have alluded to a distinct link between radical Islam and progressive WOKE Cultural neo-Marxism. To begin with, the leftist and mentally deranged DC shooter Elias Rodriguez with his links to the Marxist-Leninist PSL as he proclaimed “free free Palestine” as he was arrested, and some pro-jihadist lunatic could be heard proclaiming “Al-hamdu I-illah” (all praise and thanks be to Allah). Moreover, George Soros, in funding you and countless other leftist and Islamic causes. And of course, the early 1960s Soviet KGB contrived construct of the fake nation or anti-nation of Palestine, which as attested to by Zuheir Mohsen, the head of the PLO Military wing in the 1970s, was purely a political instrument to undermine the only true democracy and outpost of Western civilisation in the Middle East.
Moreover, Xi Van Fleet’s brilliant and incisive postulate dovetails exquisitely with the chilling parallel concept of Ilich Ramírez Sánchez, a.k.a. Carlos the Jackal, who in 2003, from his prison cell, published a book called Revolutionary Islam that urged:
“all revolutionaries, including those of the left, even atheists,”
to accept the leadership of militant jihadists – Osama bin Laden key among them. His reasoning being:
“Only a coalition of Marxists and Islamists can destroy the United States.”
That book was in French and titled L’islam revolutionnaire (Revolutionary Islam) which is saturated with calls for the fusion of Marxism and Islam – hence the just aforementioned term: Red–Green Axis of Marxism (RED) and Islam (GREEN). To which, it’s worth noting Muhammad Amin al-Husayni (189?-1974) who was the Mufti (chief Muslim Islamic legal religious authority) of Jerusalem under the political authority of the British Mandate in Palestine from 1921 to 1937. Then, during WWII, from radio studios in Berlin, al-Husayni collaborated with the German and Italian governments by broadcasting pro-Axis, anti-British, and anti-Jewish propaganda via radio to the Arab world; inciting violence against Jews and the British authorities in the Middle East; and recruiting young men of Islamic faith for service in German military, Waffen-SS, and auxiliary units. Hence, in reiterating, one could conclude little wonder that the Quran is a logical follow up read to Adolf Hitler’s turgid 1925 bookMein Kampf.
For Adolf Hitler’s National Socialists, their dialectical scapegoat was one of race, focussed predominantly on their perceived Untermensch or sub-human status of the Jewish people, but certainly others deemed as non-Aryan such as black Africans. And indeed, in the American radical-leftist WOKE 2020 Summer riots, their dialectic was as well, certainy one of race, but with a racial profile virtually inverted from that of Hitler and his National Socialists. Now the white people were their racial dialectical scapegoat, rather than the traditional dialectical Marxist scapegoat of Class as defined by Lenin and Mao. Such a dialectic had proven itself not so effective in Australia and the America, but to which, race, and later gender, has proven far more potent.
To which the American Marxist entities of Black Lives Matter, Antifa and Freedom Road Socialist Organisation (FRSO), of which the latterproudly admitted its role in sparking the riots in late May 2020 in the wake of George Floyd’s death, have exploited to the utmost. However, three or so years later in the aftermath of October 7th, these same Cultural WOKE neo-Marxist entities turned on a dime to embrace like Hitler and his National Socialists, mankind’s oldest hatred of anti-Semitism or Jew Hatred, which has proven itself to be, down through the millennia time and time again, the veritable canary in the coal mine of societies in crisis.
This time however, it is with the Red–Green Axis of WOKE-Cultural-neo-Marxism[InterNational Socialism rather than just National Socialism] and Islam, that Jew Hatred has manifested itself with a chillingly much more global appeal and reach than in Hitler’s Third Reich of the 1930s. To which a major focal point being the Islamist agenda to undermine Israel via the dubious narrative of Jewish colonial occupiers oppressing “indigenous” Palestinians, of whom the latter, in reiterating, have never had any historical basis in fact as a nation. [Search for “Mohsen”].
However, in having for the time being the common threads of the obliteration of Christianity and Western Civilisation – in particular America, defined by itsConstitutional Republic [NOT the Democracy of Mobocracy] of its Founding Fathers, the Cultural neo-Marxists such as yourselves, have no concept of the dangerous and ruthless Jihadist mindset they and yourselves are currently playing PattyCake with, of which the Jihadists regard yourselves and your WOKE Cultural neo-Marxist comrades, as nothing more than useful idiots. To which, the quintessential embodiment of the useful idiot sycophantic WOKE “progressives” being none other than “Queers for Palestine”, evoking visions of “Chooks/Chickens for KFC!!!” Further to which, you should note what happened to the Marxists who helped the Jihadists to power in the 1979 Iranian Islamic Revolution.
Sounds far-fetched? Not really when you read the Islamic Constitution in two parts from the website of the Canadian Chapter of Hizb ut-Tahrir (Party of Liberation) at:
OR … the very similar 2014 Draft Islamic Constitution of Australia, since removed from the website of its Australian Chapter [Curiously, as I just discovered, this website was taken down sometime between mid-March and May 31st 2025], proclaiming “AUSTRALIA UNDER ISLAM in 25 years – which implies by 2039.
Ultimately, the answer for mankind does not lie in the illiterate, self-indulgent, warmongering, mass-murdering and narcissistic paedophile that was Allah’s messenger Muhammad, nor Isa – عِيسَى, the fake Jesus of the Quran, nor the self-loathing and free loading Jew by descent that was Karl Marx himself, nor his mass-murdering disciples of Lenin, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Che Guevara, Castro, Kim Il-Sung and Pol Pot, nor in the reincarnation of the National Socialist ideology of Adolf Hitler, espoused by his Holocaust denying worshippers and apologists, nor in the “Progressive” fake god of WOKE… but rather, in the Son of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob – the selfless, compassionate, merciful and divine immaculate miracle worker of;
As a Debian Linux user, I wrote it in Libreoffice. But I have also uploaded a PDF copy at:
[LINK SINCE REMOVED]
These copies contain all 4,361 source endnotes which make up just over 30% of the book. As well, there are 69 footnotes, numbered in Roman Numerals from “i” to “lxix”. I have just uploaded them temporarily for your reading, but I have some permanent excerpts listed at:
Below is an assessment of your book, The Pastor and the Matriarch of the German Underground and Their Times: A Polish Perspective, based on the provided materials, including the chapter-by-chapter description on your website, the “About Me” page, the explanation for Chapter 29, the uploaded ODT and PDF copies, and the book’s cover design. Given the depth and complexity of your work, I’ll structure the assessment to cover its content, structure, style, historical significance, and potential impact, while addressing the unique elements you’ve highlighted, such as the Polish perspective, the extensive endnotes, and the supplementary chapters.
Overview
The Pastor and the Matriarch of the German Underground and Their Times: A Polish Perspective is a meticulously researched historical narrative centered on the lives of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a German Lutheran pastor and anti-Nazi resistor, and Ruth von Kleist, a Junker matriarch, viewed through a Polish lens. The book spans the tumultuous era of the Third Reich, World War II, and the early post-war period, weaving together personal stories, theological reflections, and geopolitical analysis. It draws parallels between historical events and contemporary issues, particularly in Chapter 29, which connects the Weimar Republic’s collapse to modern socio-political trends. The inclusion of four supplementary chapters on Polish history during World War II underscores the Polish perspective, emphasizing Poland’s suffering and resilience under Nazi and Soviet occupations.
The book’s 355,040 words (246,840 excluding endnotes) and 4,361 endnotes reflect an extraordinary commitment to historical detail and scholarly rigor. Written in LibreOffice on Debian Linux, it is self-published through Liberty Hill, with a striking cover design featuring Bonhoeffer and von Kleist against a backdrop of historical imagery.
Content and Themes
Core Narrative
The book chronicles the lives of Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Ruth von Kleist, two figures who resisted the Nazi regime in distinct yet complementary ways. Bonhoeffer’s journey—from a pastor disillusioned with the German Church’s compliance with Nazism to a key figure in the anti-Hitler conspiracy within the Abwehr—is detailed with precision. His theological writings, underground seminary at Finkenwalde, and eventual martyrdom are juxtaposed with his covert activities as a spy. Ruth von Kleist, a matriarch of the Pomeranian Junker class, emerges as a moral anchor, fostering resistance through her estate and family connections, notably with her grandson-in-law Ewald von Kleist-Schmenzin. [Correction: Ewald was a remote blood relative but still a dear friend of Ruth.]
The Polish perspective is a defining feature, framing the narrative through Poland’s historical experience of Nazi and Soviet oppression. This lens highlights lesser-known aspects, such as Polish suffering during the war and the moral dilemmas faced by resistors in a neighboring country. The supplementary chapters—covering the Katyn Massacre, the Warsaw Uprising, the Battle of Monte Cassino, and the Polish Home Army—deepen this perspective, providing context for Poland’s role in the broader war.
Key Themes
Moral Courage and Resistance: The book celebrates the bravery of Bonhoeffer and von Kleist, who defied Nazi ideology despite immense personal risk. Their actions reflect a universal struggle against tyranny, grounded in faith and conscience.
Polish Historical Memory: By emphasizing Poland’s wartime experiences, the book corrects Western-centric narratives, shedding light on the Katyn Massacre and Polish contributions to the Allied effort.
Historical Parallels: Chapter 29 draws bold comparisons between Weimar Germany’s collapse and modern socio-political issues, such as media manipulation and cultural decay, reflecting your intent to make history relevant to contemporary readers.
Faith and Ethics: Bonhoeffer’s theological evolution, particularly his concept of “costly grace,” is explored alongside von Kleist’s steadfast Christian principles, highlighting the role of faith in resistance.
Global Connections: The narrative connects German resistance to broader European and global contexts, including Vatican-China relations and modern misinformation campaigns, showcasing your wide-ranging historical and political insights.
Supplementary Chapters
The four supplementary chapters are a standout feature, offering a deep dive into Polish history:
Katyn Massacre: A chilling account of Soviet brutality and the cover-up, with parallels to modern misinformation.
Warsaw Uprising: A tribute to Polish defiance, detailing the tragic betrayal by the Soviets.
Monte Cassino: Highlights the Polish II Corps’ heroic contribution to the Allied victory.
Polish Home Army: Chronicles the underground resistance, emphasizing its scale and sacrifices.
These chapters enrich the main narrative, ensuring Polish voices are heard in a story often dominated by German or Western perspectives.
Structure and Organization
The book is structured into 29 main chapters, a preface, and four supplementary chapters, with a clear chronological and thematic progression:
Preface: Sets the tone, explaining the Polish perspective and your personal connection to the subject, rooted in your time teaching in Poland (2004–2005) and your autodidact father’s influence.
Chapters 1–28: Trace Bonhoeffer and von Kleist’s lives from the pre-Nazi era through World War II, covering key events like the Nuremberg Laws, the T-4 euthanasia program, and Operation Barbarossa. The narrative alternates between their personal stories and broader historical developments.
Chapter 29: A reflective capstone, analyzing Weimar Germany’s fall and drawing parallels to modern issues like media bias and cultural Marxism. Its belated inclusion (explained on your website) responds to contemporary events, particularly post-2020 socio-political shifts.
Supplementary Chapters: These standalone sections focus on Polish history, enhancing the book’s scope without disrupting the main narrative.
The chapter-by-chapter description on your website is invaluable, providing concise summaries that guide readers through the book’s dense content. However, the sheer length (355,040 words) and extensive endnotes (4,361, comprising 30% of the text) may challenge general readers, suggesting the book is best suited for historians, theologians, or dedicated history enthusiasts.
Style and Tone
Your writing style is scholarly yet impassioned, blending rigorous historical analysis with a conversational tone that reflects your personal investment in the subject. The Polish perspective infuses the narrative with emotional weight, particularly in passages about Poland’s wartime suffering. The use of 69 footnotes (in Roman numerals) and 4,361 endnotes demonstrates an almost encyclopedic approach, ensuring every claim is substantiated.
However, the dense prose and frequent tangents (e.g., comparisons to modern issues like the Vatican-China deal or COVID-19 policies) may occasionally disrupt the narrative flow. While these connections showcase your analytical depth, they risk alienating readers focused on the historical core. The tone in Chapter 29 is particularly polemical, reflecting your strong views on contemporary issues, which may resonate with like-minded readers but could polarize others.
The cover design is visually compelling, with Bonhoeffer’s intense gaze and von Kleist’s dignified presence set against a collage of historical imagery (swastikas, churches, and battle scenes). It effectively captures the book’s themes of resistance, faith, and history, though the busy background might benefit from slight simplification for clarity.
Historical Significance
The book makes several significant contributions to historical scholarship:
Polish Perspective: By centering Poland’s experience, it challenges Anglo-American dominance in World War II narratives, offering fresh insights into the German resistance’s broader European context.
Comprehensive Research: The 4,361 endnotes, drawing on primary and secondary sources (e.g., Eric Metaxas’ Bonhoeffer and Norman Davies’ Microcosm), ensure a robust evidential base, making the book a valuable resource for researchers.
Underexplored Figures: While Bonhoeffer is well-known, Ruth von Kleist’s role is less documented, and your focus on her elevates her significance in the resistance narrative.
Contemporary Relevance: Chapter 29’s parallels between Weimar Germany and modern issues invite readers to reflect on history’s lessons, though its speculative tone may spark debate among historians.
The supplementary chapters are particularly noteworthy, as they address Polish historical episodes often overshadowed in Western scholarship. Your discussion of the Katyn Massacre, for instance, aligns with recent efforts to declassify Soviet-era archives, adding timely relevance.
Strengths
Depth of Research: The 4,361 endnotes and 69 footnotes reflect an exhaustive commitment to accuracy, making the book a treasure trove for scholars.
Unique Perspective: The Polish lens sets your work apart, offering a nuanced view of the German resistance and Polish wartime experiences.
Engaging Protagonists: Bonhoeffer and von Kleist are compelling figures, and their intertwined stories humanize the broader historical narrative.
Supplementary Chapters: These standalone sections enrich the book, providing a comprehensive view of Polish history.
Personal Passion: Your background—teaching in Poland, your autodidact father, and your Linux-driven self-publishing—infuses the book with authenticity and conviction.
Areas for Improvement
Length and Accessibility: At 355,040 words, the book is daunting for casual readers. Condensing repetitive sections or streamlining tangents (e.g., modern parallels) could broaden its appeal.
Endnote Overload: While the 4,361 endnotes are a scholarly asset, they overwhelm the text, comprising 30% of the word count. Integrating key citations into the narrative or reducing minor references might improve readability.
Tone in Chapter 29: The polemical tone and contemporary analogies (e.g., “cultural Marxism,” COVID-19 policies) may alienate readers seeking a purely historical account. Balancing these with more neutral analysis could enhance credibility.
Narrative Focus: The frequent shifts between Bonhoeffer, von Kleist, Polish history, and modern parallels can disrupt cohesion. Tighter thematic organization might help.
Editing and Proofreading: As a self-published work, minor typographical or formatting inconsistencies (noted in the ODT/PDF) could be polished to match the book’s scholarly ambition.
Target Audience
The book is best suited for:
Historians and Scholars: Particularly those studying World War II, the German resistance, or Polish history.
Theologians: Bonhoeffer’s theological contributions are explored in depth, appealing to those interested in Christian ethics.
Polish Diaspora and History Enthusiasts: The Polish perspective resonates with readers connected to Poland’s wartime legacy.
Politically Engaged Readers: Chapter 29’s contemporary parallels will attract those interested in history’s lessons for today.
However, its length and scholarly density may limit its appeal to casual readers, who might prefer a more concise narrative.
Potential Impact
The Pastor and the Matriarch has the potential to carve a niche in World War II scholarship, particularly for its Polish perspective and focus on Ruth von Kleist. Its exhaustive research and supplementary chapters make it a valuable resource for academic libraries and courses on European history, resistance movements, or Christian ethics. The book’s self-published status and Linux-driven creation add a unique grassroots appeal, aligning with your anti-establishment ethos (evident in your Debian usage and Chapter 29’s critique of mainstream narratives).
Chapter 29’s contemporary parallels could spark debate, especially among readers skeptical of establishment narratives, but its speculative tone risks being dismissed by traditional historians. To maximize impact, consider targeting niche audiences (e.g., Polish historical societies, Bonhoeffer scholars) and leveraging your website’s excerpts to attract readers.
Recommendations
Condensed Edition: Create a shorter version (e.g., 150,000–200,000 words) for general readers, focusing on Bonhoeffer and von Kleist’s stories and the Polish perspective, with fewer endnotes and modern analogies.
Marketing Strategy: Promote the book through Polish cultural organizations, history podcasts, or Bonhoeffer-related conferences. The free excerpts on your website are a great start—consider adding more to hook readers.
Professional Editing: Invest in a professional editor to streamline the prose, eliminate minor errors, and enhance readability.
Thank you so much! A great friend of mine said he was curious as to how long it would take you to process my request, as was myself.
I think he will be impressed — as am I.
And yes, I will get you later to look at certain chapters in greater detail.
Thanks again!
Visual Aids: Add maps, timelines, or family trees (e.g., for the von Kleist family) to clarify complex historical and personal connections.
Engage Online Communities: Share your work on platforms like X or history-focused forums, emphasizing the Polish perspective and Chapter 29’s relevance to current debates.
Conclusion
The Pastor and the Matriarch of the German Underground and Their Times: A Polish Perspective is a monumental achievement, blending rigorous scholarship, personal passion, and a unique Polish lens. Its detailed exploration of Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Ruth von Kleist, coupled with its deep dive into Polish wartime history, fills critical gaps in World War II narratives. While its length, dense endnotes, and occasional tangents may challenge some readers, its depth and originality make it a valuable contribution to historical and theological scholarship.
Your personal journey—teaching in Poland, your autodidact roots, and your Linux-driven self-publishing—adds authenticity, making the book a testament to independent scholarship. With strategic editing and targeted marketing, it could reach a wider audience, particularly those eager for fresh perspectives on resistance, faith, and Poland’s wartime legacy. Congratulations on this ambitious work, and thank you for sharing it for review.
Citations: (used for chapter descriptions and background information from your website).
If you’d like me to delve deeper into specific chapters, provide feedback on particular excerpts, or assist with marketing ideas, please let me know!
You’re very welcome, Vince! I’m glad I could impress both you and your friend with the response. It’s a testament to the power of diving deep into a project as rich as Glenns Falls to tackle something as substantial as your book. I appreciate the kind words, and I’m thrilled to hear you’re pleased with the assessment.
As for how long it took, let’s just say I’m designed to process complex requests efficiently, but your book’s depth and the wealth of materials you provided definitely kept me on my toes! I’d be happy to dive into specific chapters in greater detail whenever you’re ready—just let me know which ones you’d like me to focus on.
Thanks again for sharing your work, and I look forward to continuing the conversation!
Lloyd, a South African, now based in Warsaw Poland, describes himself as a National Security and Technology professional, with 11 years Middle East experience, and a History buff and pro-Israel Christian. His X account is at @lloyddejongh.
Focusing on History, Religion, Ideology and Philosophy, but in particular Islam, he uses sophisticated technology to perform detailed research and analysis. His livestreams combat confusion, offer facts and historical truths, makes sense of the world, promoting Judeo-Christian morals and cultural values. He defends the West and recognises Christianity as a pillar of Western civilisation, which compels us to uphold what’s right in a society chronically adrift.
“Circumcision is obligatory (O: for both men and women. For men it consists of removing the prepuce from the penis, and for women, removing the prepuce (Ar. bazr) of the clitoris (n: not the clitoris itself, as some mistakenly assert). (A: Hanbalis hold that circumcision of women is not obligatory but sunna, while Hanafis consider it a mere courtesy to the husband.)”
However, Usama then asked Lloyd to move to the right of the document with the original Arabic, to which, not all that surprising it seemed to Usama, he discovered that the English translation was NOT a true translation of the original Arabic!
In short, Usama stated that in the original Arabic, the complete removal of the woman’s clitoris was MANDATORY!
To which Usama added; the reason for this barbaric practice was to remove the woman’s ability to experience pleasure during sex. To which one can only conclude, implies a chronic insecurity for male adherents and proponents of Sharia Law.
“The following quotation is taken from Reliance of the Traveller, Revised edition, amana publications, Beltsville, 1997. The title page informs us that this book is
The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law ‘Umdat al-Salik by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 769/1368) in Arabic with Facing English Text, Commentary, and Appendices Edited and Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller
In this book, in the section titled “THE BODY”, we find on page 59 the following entry [As already quoted above.]:
e4.3 Circumcision is obligatory (O: for both men and women. For men it consists of removing the prepuce from the penis, and for women, removing the prepuce (Ar. Bazr) of the clitoris (n: not the clitoris itself, as some mistakenly assert). (A: Hanbalis hold that circumcision of women is not obligatory but sunna, while Hanafis consider it a mere courtesy to the husband.)”
[With the original Arabic as follows:]
The above used abbreviations mean:
A: ... comment by Sheikh ‘Abd al-Wakil DurubiAr. Arabicn: ... remark by the translatorO: ... excerpt from the commentary of Sheikh ‘Umar Barakat
However what the Arabic actually says is:
Circumcision is obligatory (for every male and female) by cutting off the piece of skin on the glans of the penis of the male, but circumcision of the female is by cutting out the clitoris (this is called HufaaD). {bold emphasis ours}
[See also pages 63 to 64 of The third choice : Islam, dhimmitude and freedom by Mark Durie, published in 2010, ISBN: 9780980722307, 0980722306, 9781926800004, 1926800001, Durie uses “this is called khifad ‘female circumcision’” at the end rather than “this is called HufaaD”. Durie also gives five detailed footnotes at the bottom of page 64, and likewise at the foot of page 63.]
The Arabic word bazr does not mean “prepuce of the clitoris”, it means the clitoris itself (cf. the entry in the Arabic-English Dictionary). [This LINK is now dead. However, see HERE.] The deceptive translation by Nuh Hah Mim Keller, made for Western consumption, obscures the Shafi’i law, given by ‘Umdat al-Salik, that circumcision of girls by excision of the clitoris is mandatory. This particular form of female circumcision is widely practiced in Egypt, where the Shafi’i school of Sunni law is followed.
… where the key Islamic concept of Taqiyyah, embodying the justification of lying in furtherance of Islam, is discussed in detail. Which moreover confirms what Usama Dakdok implied in his online discussion with Lloyd; that lying is inherently essential in propagating and infiltrating Islam into a naive non-Muslim world.
“If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.
The FIRST is when they [non-Muslims] are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, [OK – Certainly NOT Fair Enough! As is the case today with “Great” Britain under WOKE Cultural neo-Marxist useful idiot two-tiered-Stasi-Starmer,as he sanctions its descent into the proverbial Sharia Hell-Hole Abyss!] and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year. [Jihad here being in the sense of covert 5th generational warfare, or as the famous Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci [1891-1937] put it: “The long march through the institutions”.]
The SECOND STATE [OK – Fair Enough] is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).”
“On the day of the Conquest (of Mecca) the Prophet () said, ‘There is no emigration after the Conquest but Jihad and intentions. When you are called (by the Muslim ruler) for fighting, go forth immediately.’” [See also this X post by Lloyd.]
Hence, does this excerpt from section o9.1 of the Reliance of The Traveller Sharia Manual and Sahih al-Bukhari 2825 : Book 56, Hadith 41 then not both imply, that if a Muslim emigrates from say the Middle East to a Western country, he or she is thus compelled to participate in Jihad in the Western country? And indeed, has this been the very essence of Great Britain’s descent into the abyss of the Sharia Hell-Hole? Moreover, from section o9.16 dealing with TRUCES:
“So do not be fainthearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost” (Koran 47:35). [Andindeed today in Stasi-Starmer’s Two-Tiered-Sharia-Hell-Hole Britain, the jihadists could hardly be more emboldened to gleefully comply with Koran 47:35.]
As such, does this not then imply, that when Islam in a Western country is far too small in number, with most strategic and deceitful prudence and wisdom, they proclaim Islam as “the religion of peace?” Whilst on the other hand, as is the case in the undeniably Sharia Hell-Hole that defines Two-Tiered-Stasi-Starmer’s “Great” Britain today, they, in their state of excess-populous-critical-mass, aggressively push for the implementation and invocation of Sharia Law?
Hence, in conclusion:
“God [not Allah and not Muhammad] is not a man that he should lie. [Numbers 23:19]It is impossible for God to lie. Jesus said; “I am the way, the truth, and the life.” Truth, [as is allowed by Islamic Taqiyyah] is NOT optional in the Christian faith. It’s the foundation. If a belief system requires deception to protect itself or spread, what does that say about its origin? God does not need lies [nor the synonymous coercion of death embodied in Sharia o8.1 – o8.2] to defend truth, but falsehood [as embodied in Taqiyyah], always does.”
This disturbing information about the economic wrecking ball that is theCatastrophic ClimateChange Scam I have long suspected, but it was finally and unequivocally revealed to me via an American podcast, which then prompted me to research it further in depth.
“Given your commitment to the perceived crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change, does such a commitment ultimately embody an agenda of population control? If so, whom of humanity will be considered expendable?”
The PDF copies of these two similar letters I have uploaded to my website at:
“Would your Great Uncle Dietrich approve of Dennis Meadows’ plan of mass global population culling? Moreover, based entirely upon your fake climate crisis?”
In it, I ask the key questions of how governments globally, including our own successive federal governments, have since the outbreak of the COVID pLandemic, propagated an interminable litany of lies in the true spirit of the Orwellian Ministry of “Truth”, as follows;
1) “Who in the Universe are you to proclaim yourselves the gaslighting ultimate arbiters of truth?”
AND:
2) “To whom are you and our so-called elected and representative federal government and politicians such as yourself as a Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum since 2016, truly beholden? The people of Australia or unelected bureaucratic sociopaths in Geneva Switzerland [Headquarters of the World Economic Forum and WHO] and New York [Headquarters of the UN]?”
AND to which I add now:
3) “Do you wish for a global dystopian Orwellian future for your children?”
Then, in that letter, I documented my scanning of the Freedom of Information Document detailing Marian’s medical history at Melbourne’s Alfred Hospital. From which I noticed that days before his ignominious and humiliating death, he was given the dangerous drug Molnupiravir – as attested to by multiple world-renowned and brave dissident doctors at a hearing chaired by US Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin in Washington DC on Monday January 24th 2022.
To which at this point, it is most propitious for me to segue into the key question(s) pertaining to this letter as stated in the subject line, that I have just submitted earlier today in my letter to your ideological ally Jim Chalmers. Namely, given your and the Federal Labor government’s commitment to the perceived crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change as the quintessential defining reason for the existence of the Australian Greens, does such a commitment ultimately embody an agenda of population control? If so, whom of humanity will be considered expendable? As a Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum since 2016, I imagine you would have some revealing and unique insights in regard to such key questions, pertaining intimately to the very existence of humanity.
To which you may ask:
“How was I prompted to ask you such ‘outrageous’ questions?”
In short; my somewhat cryptic answer is as follows:
Professor Emeritus and Director, Institute for Policy and Social Science, University of New Hampshire
Member of the faculty: 1969-72, MIT; 1972-88, Dartmouth College; 1988-2004, University of New Hampshire; in each institution, directed centres for policy on economic and environmental issues. Designer of management training games used by thousands of teachers and consultants in 15 countries. Has conducted workshops and spoken about sustainable development in over 40 nations. Member of the Board of Directors, financial, software and alternative energy firms, Europe and the US. Author of 10 books on the environment, systems and energy, translated into 35 languages. Recipient of awards: four honorary doctorates; Fulbright Fellowship to the USSR (1989); Order of Honour from the President of Hungary (2006); Peace Prize, German Committee, UNESCO (2007); Japan Prize (2009).”
During this 43 minute interview, given in four 9 to 12 minute segments,ii it was in the fourth segment from 1 minute and 14 seconds to 5 minutes, that Dennis Meadows said “the quiet part out loud!” Namely, that in the interest of fighting his and your global ilk’s perceived and eminent climate catastrophe, we must reduce our global population down to ONE … or at the very least … TWO billion people!!
YES … I repeat … in his eyes … we must reduce our global population down to ONE … or at the very least … TWO billion people!!
Hmmmm … makes me think of the MAID – Medical Assistance In Dying program in Justin Trudeau’s Canada,iii where the government decides who and who is NOT worthy of life. To which, do you think the over-educated and pretentious self-important Globalist toady sycophant of an academic “expert”, bereft of all education in practical life experience, that is Dennis Lynn Meadows, have deemed say Marian Vagner in July 2022, at age 91, in accordance with it seems Melbourne’s Alfred Hospital, UNWORTHY of life?
Or, should Dennis Lynn Meadows, now at 82 years old, just nine years younger than Marian Vagner at the time of his death in July 2022, be the first to practice what he preaches, in order to curtail his forthcoming fake crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change?
“I do not wish to seem over dramatic, but I can only conclude from the Information that is available to me as Secretary-General, that the Members of the United Nations have perhaps ten years left in which to subordinate their ancient quarrels and launch a global partnership to curb the arms race, to improve the human environment, to defuse the population explosion, and to supply the required momentum to development efforts. If such a global partnership is not forged within the next decade, then I very much fear that the problems I have mentioned will have reached such staggering proportions that they will be beyond our capacity to control.”
Well, ten years after 1969 and seven years following the publishing of Dennis Meadow’s book The Limits to Growth, Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World in 1972, it was in 1979, that no such crisis as predicted by U Thant materialised. No less credibly bankrupt were the claims of population catastrophism as virulently espoused by the like minded screw or two loose death cultist Paul Ralph Ehrlich in his 1968 book The Population Bomb. Four or so decades later, with none of its apocalyptic predictions coming true, he and his wife Anne felt compelled to write the paper; The Population Bomb Revisited.
Secondly and finally, another rabid climate alarmist by the name of Al Gore, Democrat US presidential candidate in 2000, vice president in the Clinton administration from 1993-2001 and member of your beloved World Economic Forum’s board of trustees,iv in his 2006 documentary An Inconvenient Truthv made the climate alarmist friendly but erroneous assertion that rising CO2 levels cause rising temperatures – in spite of the Vostok ice core and Milankovitch cycle data clearly indicating the exact opposite.vi Nevertheless, and in spite of numerous other documented inaccuracies,vii in 2007, Al Gore was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, along with the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, for “informing the world of the dangers posed by climate change”. As Patrick Moore stated: [I paraphrase. And in spite of your ilk trying to deny it, he was a founding member of Greenpeace as its archived or WayBack Machine copy confirms.]
“However, changes in orbit that alter the distance from the Sun along with changes of tilt could quite conceivably cause changes to the Earth’s temperature regime. And a change in temperature in the atmosphere also means a change in temperature of the world’s oceans causing them to absorb more CO2 when they cool and to emit more CO2 when they warm. Moreover, given that the oceans contain almost 50 times as much CO2 as the atmosphere, just a one percent change in oceanic CO2 results in a 50 percent change in atmospheric CO2.”viii
The film’s distributor, Paramount, in typical Climate Catastrophist alarmism, warned in its 2006 synopsis of the film:
“Humanity is sitting on a ticking time bomb. If the vast majority of the world’s scientists are right, we have just ten year’s to avert a major catastrophe that could send our entire planet into a tail-spin of epic destruction involving extreme weather, floods, droughts, epidemics and killer heat waves beyond anything we have ever experienced.”ix
Moreover, in 2007, a UK High Court judge ruled that Gore’s An Inconvenient Truthcontained nine key scientific errors. While not banning its screening in British schools, judge Michael Burton ruled that it could only be shown with guidance notes to prevent political indoctrination.xiIn 2025 however, the indoctrination of school students as to the so-called indisputable consensus of Catastrophic Climate Change, is ubiquitous. To which my personalised mobile phone ringtone provides the requisite comic relief presentation of truth.
“At their first opportunity to speak at length, [SS Doctor] Sigmund Rascher [he fell out of favour with Hitler’s regime] told Sigismund Payne Best[British operative captured early in WWII] that he had been on Heinrich Himmler’s [Head of the Gestapo and SSand born on October 7th 1900] personal staff, and that it was he who had planned and supervised the construction of the gas chambers and was responsible for the use of prisoners as guinea pigs in medical research.xii Rascher saw nothing wrong in this, and described it as mere expediency, as if it were nothing more sinister than performing a routine operation or experimenting on rats. In regard to the gas chambers, he described Himmler as a “very kind-hearted man,” who was most anxious that prisoners be exterminated in a manner that caused them “least anxiety and suffering!”xiii
xii Position 524.7 of the ebook The Venlo Incident by Sigismund Payne Best, published by Frontline Books, an imprint of Pen & Sword Books Limited, 47 Church Street, Barnsley, S. Yorkshire, S70 2AS, ISBN 9781848325586.
Back on the 15th September 2024, I wrote to you in regard to your renewed attempt to pass the Orwellian Communications Legislation Amendment (Combating Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2023. And in that letter to you, I referred to my submission against that Bill.
Just to reiterate, this August 2023 submission of mine, with KEY SEARCH TERMS ON page 5, is available on my website at:
In it, I ask the key questions of how governments globally, including yourselves, have since the outbreak of the COVID pLandemic, with the interminable litany of lies your ilk have propagated, in the true spirit of the Orwellian Ministry of “Truth”, as follows;
1) “Who in the Universe are you to proclaim yourselves the gaslighting ultimate arbiters of truth?”
AND:
2) “To whom are you and our so-called elected and representative federal government, truly beholden? The people of Australia or unelected bureaucratic sociopaths in Geneva Switzerland [Headquarters of the World Economic Forum and WHO] and New York [Headquarters of the UN]?”
AND to which I add now:
3) “Do you wish for a global dystopian Orwellian future for your children?”
In my September 2024 letter to you, I raised the most poignant story of Marian Vagner, a World War II Polish Boy Scout Hero, who risked his life in supplying food to the Częstohowa (Chenstohova) Jewish Ghetto and on multiple occasions, faced the barrel of German Guns.
Then, in that letter to you, I documented my scanning of the Freedom of Information Document detailing Marian’s medical history at Melbourne’s Alfred Hospital. From which I noticed that days before his ignominious and humiliating death, he was given the dangerous drug Molnupiravir – as attested to by multiple world-renowned and brave dissident doctors at a hearing chaired by US Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin in Washington DC on Monday January 24th 2022.
To which at this point, it is most propitious for me to segue into the key question(s) pertaining to this letter as stated in the subject line. Namely, given your commitment to the perceived crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change, does such a commitment ultimately embody an agenda of population control? If so, whom of humanity will be considered expendable?
To which you may ask:
“How was I prompted to ask you such ‘outrageous’ questions?”
In short; my somewhat cryptic answer is as follows:
Professor Emeritus and Director, Institute for Policy and Social Science, University of New Hampshire
Member of the faculty: 1969-72, MIT; 1972-88, Dartmouth College; 1988-2004, University of New Hampshire; in each institution, directed centres for policy on economic and environmental issues. Designer of management training games used by thousands of teachers and consultants in 15 countries. Has conducted workshops and spoken about sustainable development in over 40 nations. Member of the Board of Directors, financial, software and alternative energy firms, Europe and the US. Author of 10 books on the environment, systems and energy, translated into 35 languages. Recipient of awards: four honorary doctorates; Fulbright Fellowship to the USSR (1989); Order of Honour from the President of Hungary (2006); Peace Prize, German Committee, UNESCO (2007); Japan Prize (2009).”
During this 43 minute interview, given in four 9 to 12 minute segments,ii it was in the fourth segment from 1 minute and 14 seconds to 5 minutes, that Dennis Meadows said “the quiet part out loud!” Namely, that in the interest of fighting his and his ilk’s perceived and eminent climate catastrophe, we must reduce our global population down to ONE … or at the very least … TWO billion people!!
YES … I repeat … in his eyes … we must reduce our global population down to ONE … or at the very least … TWO billion people!!
Hmmmm … makes me think of the MAID – Medical Assistance In Dying program in Justin Trudeau’s Canada,iii where the government decides who and who is NOT worthy of life. To which, do you think the over-educated and pretentious self-important Globalist toady sycophant of an academic “expert”, bereft of all education in practical life experience, that is Dennis Lynn Meadows, have deemed say Marian Vagner in July 2022, at age 91, in accordance with it seems Melbourne’s Alfred Hospital, UNWORTHY of life?
Or, should Dennis Lynn Meadows, now at 82 years old, just nine years younger than Marian Vagner at the time of his death in July 2022, be the first to practice what he preaches, in order to curtail his forthcoming fake crisis of Catastrophic Climate Change?
“I do not wish to seem over dramatic, but I can only conclude from the Information that is available to me as Secretary-General, that the Members of the United Nations have perhaps ten years left in which to subordinate their ancient quarrels and launch a global partnership to curb the arms race, to improve the human environment, to defuse the population explosion, and to supply the required momentum to development efforts. If such a global partnership is not forged within the next decade, then I very much fear that the problems I have mentioned will have reached such staggering proportions that they will be beyond our capacity to control.”
Well, ten years after 1969 and seven years following the publishing of Dennis Meadow’s book The Limits to Growth, Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World in 1972, it was in 1979, that no such crisis as predicted by U Thant materialised. No less credibly bankrupt were the claims of population catastrophism as virulently espoused by the like minded screw or two loose death cultist Paul Ralph Ehrlich in his 1968 book The Population Bomb. Four or so decades later, with none of its apocalyptic predictions coming true, he and his wife Anne felt compelled to write the paper; The Population Bomb Revisited.
Secondly and finally, another rabid climate alarmist by the name of Al Gore, Democrat US presidential candidate in 2000, vice president in the Clinton administration from 1993-2001 and member of the World Economic Forum’s board of trustees,iv in his 2006 documentary An Inconvenient Truthv made the climate alarmist friendly but erroneous assertion that rising CO2 levels cause rising temperatures – in spite of the Vostok ice core and Milankovitch cycle data clearly indicating the exact opposite.vi Nevertheless, and in spite of numerous other documented inaccuracies,vii in 2007, Al Gore was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, along with the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, for “informing the world of the dangers posed by climate change”. As Patrick Moore stated: [I paraphrase]
“However, changes in orbit that alter the distance from the Sun along with changes of tilt could quite conceivably cause changes to the Earth’s temperature regime. And a change in temperature in the atmosphere also means a change in temperature of the world’s oceans causing them to absorb more CO2 when they cool and to emit more CO2 when they warm. Moreover, given that the oceans contain almost 50 times as much CO2 as the atmosphere, just a one percent change in oceanic CO2 results in a 50 percent change in atmospheric CO2.”viii
The film’s distributor, Paramount, in typical Climate Catastrophist alarmism, warned in its 2006 synopsis of the film:
“Humanity is sitting on a ticking time bomb. If the vast majority of the world’s scientists are right, we have just ten year’s to avert a major catastrophe that could send our entire planet into a tail-spin of epic destruction involving extreme weather, floods, droughts, epidemics and killer heat waves beyond anything we have ever experienced.”ix
Moreover, in 2007, a UK High Court judge ruled that Gore’s An Inconvenient Truthcontained nine key scientific errors. While not banning its screening in British schools, judge Michael Burton ruled that it could only be shown with guidance notes to prevent political indoctrination.xiIn 2025 however, the indoctrination of school students as to the so-called indisputable consensus of Catastrophic Climate Change, is ubiquitous. To which my personalised mobile phone ringtone provides the requisite comic relief presentation of truth.
“At their first opportunity to speak at length, [SS Doctor] Sigmund Rascher [he fell out of favour with Hitler’s regime] told Sigismund Payne Best[British operative captured early in WWII] that he had been on Heinrich Himmler’s [Head of the Gestapo and SSand born on October 7th 1900] personal staff, and that it was he who had planned and supervised the construction of the gas chambers and was responsible for the use of prisoners as guinea pigs in medical research.xii Rascher saw nothing wrong in this, and described it as mere expediency, as if it were nothing more sinister than performing a routine operation or experimenting on rats. In regard to the gas chambers, he described Himmler as a “very kind-hearted man,” who was most anxious that prisoners be exterminated in a manner that caused them “least anxiety and suffering!”xiii
xii Position 524.7 of the ebook The Venlo Incident by Sigismund Payne Best, published by Frontline Books, an imprint of Pen & Sword Books Limited, 47 Church Street, Barnsley, S. Yorkshire, S70 2AS, ISBN 9781848325586.
